Literature DB >> 21756080

Managing unplanned pregnancies in five countries: perspectives on contraception and abortion decisions.

Amy O Tsui1, John Casterline, Susheela Singh, Akinrinola Bankole, Ann M Moore, Adekunbi Kehinde Omideyi, Nancy Palomino, Zeba Sathar, Fatima Juarez, Kristen M Shellenberg.   

Abstract

Why is induced abortion common in environments in which modern contraception is readily available? This study analyses qualitative data collected from focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with women and men from low-income areas in five countries--the United States, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru and Mexico--to better understand how couples manage their pregnancy risk. Across all settings, women and men rarely weigh the advantages and disadvantages of contraception and abortion before beginning a sexual relationship or engaging in sexual intercourse. Contraception is viewed independently of abortion, and the two are linked only when the former is invoked as a preferred means to avoiding repeat abortion. For women, contraceptive methods are viewed as suspect because of perceived side effects, while abortion experience, often at significant personal risk to them, raises the spectre of social stigma and motivates better practice of contraception. In all settings, male partners figure importantly in pregnancy decisions and management. Although there are inherent study limitations of small sample sizes, the narratives reveal psychosocial barriers to effective contraceptive use and identify nodal points in pregnancy decision-making that can structure future investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21756080      PMCID: PMC4157050          DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2011.597413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Public Health        ISSN: 1744-1692


  12 in total

1.  Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-06

2.  Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide.

Authors:  Gilda Sedgh; Stanley Henshaw; Susheela Singh; Elisabeth Ahman; Iqbal H Shah
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Contraceptive discontinuation and failure and subsequent abortion in Romania: 1994-99.

Authors:  Andreea A Creanga; Rajib Acharya; Saifuddin Ahmed; Amy O Tsui
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2007-03

4.  Profile of women with abortion complications in Ghana.

Authors:  R M K Adanu; M N Ntumy; E Tweneboah
Journal:  Trop Doct       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.731

5.  Estimating clandestine abortion with the confidants method--results from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Clémentine Rossier; George Guiella; Abdoulaye Ouédraogo; Blandine Thiéba
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Clinic-based surveillance of adverse pregnancy outcomes to identify induced abortions in Accra, Ghana.

Authors:  Elizabeth Oliveras; Clement Ahiadeke; Richard M Adanu; Allan G Hill
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2008-06

7.  Rates of induced abortion in Iran: the roles of contraceptive use and religiosity.

Authors:  Amir Erfani; Kevin McQuillan
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2008-06

8.  Estimates of induced abortion in Mexico: what's changed between 1990 and 2006?

Authors:  Fatima Juarez; Susheela Singh; Sandra G Garcia; Claudia Diaz Olavarrieta
Journal:  Int Fam Plan Perspect       Date:  2008-12

9.  Man's involvement in the experience of abortion and the dynamics of the couple's relationship: a clinical study.

Authors:  D Naziri
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Abortion: an open secret? Abortion and social network involvement in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Clémentine Rossier
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2007-11
View more
  12 in total

1.  Associates of Neonatal, Infant and Child Mortality in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan: A Multilevel Analysis Using the 2012-2013 Demographic and Health Surveys.

Authors:  Anna Helova; Kristine R Hearld; Henna Budhwani
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-02

2.  The discourses on induced abortion in Ugandan daily newspapers: a discourse analysis.

Authors:  Sofia Larsson; Miriam Eliasson; Marie Klingberg Allvin; Elisabeth Faxelid; Lynn Atuyambe; Sara Fritzell
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Effectiveness of family planning policies: the abortion paradox.

Authors:  Nathalie Bajos; Mireille Le Guen; Aline Bohet; Henri Panjo; Caroline Moreau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of two intervention models on contraceptive attitudes and behaviors among nulliparous women in Shanghai, China: a clustered randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuan He; Ning Zhang; Jue Wang; Na He; Yan Du; Jing-Xin Ding; Ying Zhang; Xiao-Tian Li; Jian Huang; Ke-Qin Hua
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Validity assessment of self-reported weight and its correction process among Mexican adult women of reproductive age.

Authors:  Lucia Hernández-Barrera; Belem Trejo Valdivia; Martha Maria Téllez-Rojo; Simón Barquera; Cinthya Muñoz-Manrique
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The role of change in fertility desire on change in family planning use: A longitudinal investigation in urban Uttar Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Ujjaval Srivastava; Anjali Singh; Prashant Verma; Kaushalendra Kumar Singh
Journal:  Gates Open Res       Date:  2019-04-29

7.  Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Unintended Pregnancy Among Latina Women.

Authors:  Karen Trister Grace; Michele R Decker; Kamila A Alexander; Jacquelyn Campbell; Elizabeth Miller; Nancy Perrin; Nancy Glass
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2020-06-02

8.  Exploring experience of and engagement in coercive pregnancy behaviors among sexually active young men from five clinics in Baltimore, MD.

Authors:  Nicholas B Dimenstein; Laura D Lindberg; Renata Arrington-Sanders; Jacky M Jennings; Lori F Frohwirth; Patricia J Dittus; Arik V Marcell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Inadequate birth spacing is perceived as riskier than all family planning methods, except sterilization and abortion, in a qualitative study among urban Nigerians.

Authors:  Hilary M Schwandt; Joanna Skinner; Luciana Estelle Hebert; Lisa Cobb; Abdulmumin Saad; Mojisola Odeku
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Do perceived contraception attitudes influence abortion stigma? Evidence from Luanda, Angola.

Authors:  Madeline Blodgett; Karen Weidert; Benjamin Nieto-Andrade; Ndola Prata
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2018-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.