Literature DB >> 21755999

Biodegradable polyurethane ureas with variable polyester or polycarbonate soft segments: effects of crystallinity, molecular weight, and composition on mechanical properties.

Zuwei Ma1, Yi Hong, Devin M Nelson, Joseph E Pichamuthu, Cory E Leeson, William R Wagner.   

Abstract

Biodegradable polyurethane n class="Chemical">urea (PUU) elastomers are ideal candidates for fabricating tissue engineering scaffolds with mechanical properties akin to strong and resilient soft tissues. PUU with a crystalline poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) macrodiol soft segment (SS) showed good elasticity and resilience at small strains (<50%) but showed poor resilience under large strains because of stress-induced crystallization of the PCL segments, with a permanent set of 677 ± 30% after tensile failure. To obtain softer and more resilient PUUs, we used noncrystalline poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC) or poly(δ-valerolactone-co-ε-caprolactone) (PVLCL) macrodiols of different molecular weights as SSs that were reacted with 1,4-diisocyanatobutane and chain extended with 1,4-diaminobutane. Mechanical properties of the PUUs were characterized by tensile testing with static or cyclic loading and dynamic mechanical analysis. All of the PUUs synthesized showed large elongations at break (800-1400%) and high tensile strength (30-60 MPa). PUUs with noncrystalline SSs all showed improved elasticity and resilience relative to the crystalline PCL-based PUU, especially for the PUUs with high molecular weight SSs (PTMC 5400 M(n) and PVLCL 6000 M(n)), of which the permanent deformation after tensile failure was only 12 ± 7 and 39 ± 4%, respectively. The SS molecular weight also influenced the tensile modulus in an inverse fashion. Accelerated degradation studies in PBS containing 100 U/mL lipase showed significantly greater mass loss for the two polyester-based PUUs versus the polycarbonate-based PUU and for PVLCL versus PCL polyester PUUs. Basic cytocompatibility was demonstrated with primary vascular smooth muscle cell culture. The synthesized families of PUUs showed variable elastomeric behavior that could be explained in terms of the underlying molecular design and crystalline behavior. Depending on the application target of interest, these materials may provide options or guidance for soft tissue scaffold development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21755999      PMCID: PMC3188984          DOI: 10.1021/bm2007218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomacromolecules        ISSN: 1525-7797            Impact factor:   6.988


  50 in total

1.  Modification of polyurethaneurea with PEG and YIGSR peptide to enhance endothelialization without platelet adhesion.

Authors:  Ho-Wook Jun; Jennifer L West
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 3.368

2.  Poly(ester urethane)s consisting of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate] and poly(ethylene glycol) as candidate biomaterials: characterization and mechanical property study.

Authors:  Xu Li; Xian Jun Loh; Ke Wang; Chaobin He; Jun Li
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  Synthesis, characterization and cytocompatibility of polyurethaneurea elastomers with designed elastase sensitivity.

Authors:  Jianjun Guan; William R Wagner
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.988

4.  Simultaneous studies of reaction kinetics and structure development in polymer processing.

Authors:  W Bras; G E Derbyshire; D Bogg; J Cooke; M J Elwell; B U Komanschek; S Naylor; A J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-02-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Passive biaxial mechanical properties of the rat bladder wall after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  D Claire Gloeckner; Michael S Sacks; Matthew O Fraser; George T Somogyi; William C de Groat; Michael B Chancellor
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A novel approach to biodegradable block copolymers of epsilon-caprolactone and delta-valerolactone catalyzed by new aluminum metal complexes.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Lin Jia; Lingzhi Yin; Jianyong Yu; Zhen Shi; Qiang Fang; Amin Cao
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 4.979

7.  A tough biodegradable elastomer.

Authors:  Yadong Wang; Guillermo A Ameer; Barbara J Sheppard; Robert Langer
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Physical properties of high molecular weight 1,3-trimethylene carbonate and D,L-lactide copolymers.

Authors:  Ana Paula Pêgo; André A Poot; Dirk W Grijpma; Jan Feijen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  A new biomedical polyurethane with a high modulus based on 1,4-butanediisocyanate and epsilon-caprolactone.

Authors:  C J Spaans; J H De Groot; V W Belgraver; A J Pennings
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Electrospinning of novel biodegradable poly(ester urethane)s and poly(ester urethane urea)s for soft tissue-engineering applications.

Authors:  Pablo C Caracciolo; Vinoy Thomas; Yogesh K Vohra; Fabián Buffa; Gustavo A Abraham
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.896

View more
  16 in total

1.  Electrospun biodegradable elastic polyurethane scaffolds with dipyridamole release for small diameter vascular grafts.

Authors:  Primana Punnakitikashem; Danh Truong; Jyothi U Menon; Kytai T Nguyen; Yi Hong
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Synthesis, characterization, and paclitaxel release from a biodegradable, elastomeric, poly(ester urethane)urea bearing phosphorylcholine groups for reduced thrombogenicity.

Authors:  Yi Hong; Sang-Ho Ye; Anca L Pelinescu; William R Wagner
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  Rapidly Biodegrading PLGA-Polyurethane Fibers for Sustained Release of Physicochemically Diverse Drugs.

Authors:  Anna K Blakney; Felix I Simonovsky; Ian T Suydam; Buddy D Ratner; Kim A Woodrow
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-07-13

4.  Hybrid polyurea elastomers with enzymatic degradation and tunable mechanical properties.

Authors:  Nicholas A Sears; Geraldine Pena-Galea; Stacy N Cereceres; Elizabeth Cosgriff-Hernandez
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 7.813

5.  Enhanced mechanical, thermal and biocompatible nature of dual component electrospun nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Guanbao Li; Pinquan Li; Qiuan Chen; Mohan Prasath Mani; Saravana Kumar Jaganathan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Synthesis of Poly(Trimethylene Carbonate) from Amine Group Initiation: Role of Urethane Bonds in the Crystallinity.

Authors:  Thomas Brossier; Gael Volpi; Vincent Lapinte; Sebastien Blanquer
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 4.329

7.  Custom-Made Poly(urethane) Coatings Improve the Mechanical Properties of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds Designed for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Monica Boffito; Lucia Servello; Marcela Arango-Ospina; Serena Miglietta; Martina Tortorici; Susanna Sartori; Gianluca Ciardelli; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  Continuous hydrogenation of ethyl levulinate to γ-valerolactone and 2-methyl tetrahydrofuran over alumina doped Cu/SiO2 catalyst: the potential of commercialization.

Authors:  Junlin Zheng; Junhua Zhu; Xuan Xu; Wanmin Wang; Jiwen Li; Yan Zhao; Kangjian Tang; Qi Song; Xiaolan Qi; Dejin Kong; Yi Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Development of dopant-free conductive bioelastomers.

Authors:  Cancan Xu; Yihui Huang; Gerardo Yepez; Zi Wei; Fuqiang Liu; Alejandro Bugarin; Liping Tang; Yi Hong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Engineering electrospun multicomponent polyurethane scaffolding platform comprising grapeseed oil and honey/propolis for bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Cui Yan Chao; Mohan Prasath Mani; Saravana Kumar Jaganathan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.