Literature DB >> 21755316

Comparison of polypropylene versus polyester mesh in the Lichtenstein hernia repair with respect to chronic pain and discomfort.

B Sadowski1, J Rodriguez, R Symmonds, J Roberts, J Song, M Hasan Rajab, C Cummings, B Hodges.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernias are the most common operative procedure performed by general surgeons, and tension-free mesh techniques have revolutionized the procedure. While hernia recurrence rates have decreased, chronic postoperative pain has become recognized more widely. New mesh products offer the potential to decrease pain without compromising recurrence rates. Polyester mesh is a softer material than traditional polypropylene and may offer the benefit of causing less postoperative pain and improved quality of life.
METHODS: Prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial involving 78 patients assigned to receive Lichtenstein type repair with either polyester (n = 39) or polypropylene (n = 39) mesh. Attempt was made to identify ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral nerves intraoperatively and document their handling. Patients were interviewed and examined preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks and 3 months. Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (IPQ) and VAS scores were obtained and analyzed using two sample t test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables.
RESULTS: VAS scores at 3 months were 0.46 for the polyester group versus 0.56 for the polypropylene group (P = 0.6727). At 3 months, 82.3% of the polyester and 76.4% of the polypropylene group had VAS = 0 (P = 0.5486). There was no significant difference between the two groups' VAS scores at 3 months. IPQ did not show any difference between the two groups with the exception of "catching or pulling" being reported in 34.3% of polyester and 5.7% of polypropylene groups (P = 0.0028).
CONCLUSIONS: Polyester mesh does not decrease the amount of chronic pain at 3 months. Outcomes with polyester mesh are comparable to polypropylene mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair with regards to postoperative pain and quality of life. The sample size in this study was small and limits the significance of the results. Further studies are needed to find the optimal mesh for inguinal hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21755316     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-011-0841-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of tissue integration between polyester and polypropylene prostheses in the preperitoneal space.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gonzalez; Bruce J Ramshaw
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles.

Authors:  Parviz K Amid
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wilfred Lik-Man Mui; Calvin S H Ng; Terence Ming-Kit Fung; Frances Ka Yin Cheung; Chi-Ming Wong; Tze-Hin Ma; Man-Yee Yung Bn; Enders Kwok-Wai Ng
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Polyester (Parietex) mesh for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: initial experience in the United States.

Authors:  B Ramshaw; F Abiad; G Voeller; R Wilson; E Mason
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  P J O'Dwyer; A N Kingsnorth; R G Molloy; P K Small; B Lammers; G Horeyseck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  [Prospective study of laparoscopic treatment of incisional hernia by means of the use of composite mesh: indications, complications, mesh fixation materials and results].

Authors:  Stefano Olmi; Luigi Erba; Stefano Magnone; Aimone Bertolini; Emanuele Mastropasqua; Paolo Perego; Diego Massimini; Guido Zanandrea; Roberto Russo; Enrico Croce
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

7.  Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED.

Authors:  E John Gallagher; Polly E Bijur; Clarke Latimer; Wendy Silver
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.469

8.  Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males.

Authors:  M Bay-Nielsen; E Nilsson; P Nordin; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  Amudha S Poobalan; Julie Bruce; W Cairns S Smith; Peter M King; Zygmunt H Krukowski; W Alastair Chambers
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia.

Authors:  S Kumar; R G Wilson; S J Nixon; I M C Macintyre
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  7 in total

1.  Minimally invasive preperitoneal single-layer mesh repair versus standard Lichtenstein hernia repair for inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  K Arslan; B Erenoglu; E Turan; H Koksal; O Dogru
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  S Harmankaya; S Öberg; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 3.  Results from patient-reported outcome measures are inconsistently reported in inguinal hernia trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Gram-Hanssen; C Christophersen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 4.  Uniformity of Chronic Pain Assessment after Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marijke Molegraaf; Johan Lange; Arthur Wijsmuller
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 1.745

5.  The Comparison of Inflammatory Responses and Clinical Results After Groin Hernia Repair Using Polypropylene or Polyester Meshes.

Authors:  N Bulbuller; C Kirkil; A Godekmerdan; E Aygen; Y S Ilhan
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Bhangu; P Singh; T Pinkney; J M Blazeby
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.739

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.