Literature DB >> 21754519

Biphenyl-3,3'-dicarb-oxy-lic acid.

Shao-Hua Deng1, Jun Zhao, Yi-Qiang Mu, Cai Li, Hui-Min Liu.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(14)H(10)O(4), contains one half mol-ecule, the complete mol-ecule being generated by a twofold axis. The two benzene rings form a dihedral angle of 43.11 (5)°. Inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol-ecules into one-dimensional zigzag chains. These chains are further connected into two-dimensional supra-molecular layers by weak π-π stacking inter-actions between neighbouring benzene rings, with centroid-centroid distances of 3.7648 (8) Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21754519      PMCID: PMC3089151          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background non-covalent intermolecular interactions, see: Etter et al. (1990 ▶); Desiraju (2003 ▶); Yaghi et al. (2003 ▶); Li et al. (2010 ▶). For the structures of related complexes, see: Wang et al. (2005 ▶); Zhu (2010 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C14H10O4 M = 242.22 Monoclinic, a = 6.6123 (9) Å b = 3.7648 (8) Å c = 22.554 (3) Å β = 93.14 (2)° V = 560.61 (15) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.21 × 0.18 × 0.13 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.978, T max = 0.986 5212 measured reflections 1286 independent reflections 1006 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.107

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.052 wR(F 2) = 0.155 S = 1.04 1286 reflections 83 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.24 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.25 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1997 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1997 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014334/zq2097sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014334/zq2097Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C14H10O4F(000) = 252
Mr = 242.22Dx = 1.435 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P2/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yacCell parameters from 1286 reflections
a = 6.6123 (9) Åθ = 3.2–27.6°
b = 3.7648 (8) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 22.554 (3) ÅT = 296 K
β = 93.14 (2)°Prism, colourless
V = 560.61 (15) Å30.21 × 0.18 × 0.13 mm
Z = 2
Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer1286 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1006 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.107
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.6°, θmin = 3.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.978, Tmax = 0.986k = −4→4
5212 measured reflectionsl = −29→28
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.155H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0843P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1286 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
83 parametersΔρmax = 0.24 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.25 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.73331 (19)0.2984 (4)0.48869 (5)0.0617 (5)
H10.66010.39230.51240.093*
C20.7741 (2)0.2032 (4)0.38631 (6)0.0340 (4)
O20.48155 (17)0.4652 (4)0.42503 (5)0.0527 (4)
C30.6866 (2)0.2063 (4)0.32849 (6)0.0323 (4)
H30.55420.28600.32160.039*
C40.79643 (19)0.0906 (4)0.28086 (6)0.0321 (4)
C10.6531 (2)0.3318 (4)0.43585 (6)0.0373 (4)
C50.9952 (2)−0.0282 (4)0.29269 (7)0.0384 (4)
H51.0701−0.10630.26150.046*
C70.9722 (2)0.0838 (4)0.39736 (7)0.0402 (4)
H71.03010.08110.43590.048*
C61.0825 (2)−0.0316 (4)0.35005 (8)0.0421 (4)
H61.2149−0.11100.35700.050*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0573 (8)0.1005 (11)0.0274 (6)0.0284 (7)0.0010 (5)−0.0027 (6)
C20.0336 (7)0.0401 (7)0.0285 (7)0.0010 (6)0.0038 (5)0.0021 (6)
O20.0415 (7)0.0832 (9)0.0336 (6)0.0178 (6)0.0024 (5)−0.0019 (5)
C30.0270 (7)0.0397 (7)0.0305 (7)0.0014 (5)0.0030 (5)0.0024 (5)
C40.0297 (7)0.0374 (7)0.0295 (8)−0.0018 (5)0.0033 (5)0.0013 (5)
C10.0352 (8)0.0475 (8)0.0291 (7)0.0020 (6)0.0012 (5)0.0009 (6)
C50.0294 (7)0.0501 (9)0.0363 (8)0.0027 (6)0.0071 (6)−0.0010 (6)
C70.0350 (8)0.0520 (9)0.0332 (8)0.0019 (6)−0.0028 (5)0.0037 (6)
C60.0272 (7)0.0571 (9)0.0418 (9)0.0075 (6)0.0014 (6)0.0046 (7)
O1—C11.2837 (17)C4—C51.400 (2)
O1—H10.8200C4—C4i1.490 (3)
C2—C71.394 (2)C5—C61.388 (2)
C2—C31.3975 (19)C5—H50.9300
C2—C11.490 (2)C7—C61.394 (2)
O2—C11.2520 (18)C7—H70.9300
C3—C41.399 (2)C6—H60.9300
C3—H30.9300
C1—O1—H1109.5O2—C1—C2120.13 (13)
C7—C2—C3120.43 (13)O1—C1—C2116.90 (12)
C7—C2—C1120.56 (13)C6—C5—C4121.26 (13)
C3—C2—C1119.01 (12)C6—C5—H5119.4
C2—C3—C4120.53 (12)C4—C5—H5119.4
C2—C3—H3119.7C2—C7—C6119.28 (14)
C4—C3—H3119.7C2—C7—H7120.4
C3—C4—C5118.33 (13)C6—C7—H7120.4
C3—C4—C4i120.83 (14)C5—C6—C7120.16 (13)
C5—C4—C4i120.83 (14)C5—C6—H6119.9
O2—C1—O1122.97 (13)C7—C6—H6119.9
C7—C2—C3—C4−0.1 (2)C3—C2—C1—O1174.69 (14)
C1—C2—C3—C4179.39 (13)C3—C4—C5—C6−0.1 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C50.1 (2)C4i—C4—C5—C6−179.54 (11)
C2—C3—C4—C4i179.53 (10)C3—C2—C7—C60.2 (2)
C7—C2—C1—O2174.22 (14)C1—C2—C7—C6−179.33 (14)
C3—C2—C1—O2−5.3 (2)C4—C5—C6—C70.2 (2)
C7—C2—C1—O1−5.8 (2)C2—C7—C6—C5−0.2 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O2ii0.821.822.6268 (17)169.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O2i0.821.822.6268 (17)169

Symmetry code: (i) .

  4 in total

1.  Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials.

Authors:  Omar M Yaghi; Michael O'Keeffe; Nathan W Ockwig; Hee K Chae; Mohamed Eddaoudi; Jaheon Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals.

Authors:  M C Etter; J C MacDonald; J Bernstein
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1990-04-01

4.  Poly[(μ(4)-biphenyl-3,3'-dicarboxyl-ato)bis[μ(2)-1,1'-(butane-1,4-di-yl)diimidazole](μ(2)-oxalato)dimanganese(II)].

Authors:  Bao-Yong Zhu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-09-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.