Literature DB >> 21754078

3,4,5-Trihy-droxy-benzoic acid.

Namon Hirun, Saowanit Saithong, Chaveng Pakawatchai, Vimon Tantishaiyakul.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(7)H(6)O(5), the three hy-droxy groups on the ring are oriented in the same direction. There are two intra-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds in the ring. In the crystal, there are several inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and a short contact of 2.7150 (18) Å between the O atoms of the para-OH groups of adjacent mol-ecules.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21754078      PMCID: PMC3099763          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811007471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the biological activity of the title compound, see: Gomes et al. (2003 ▶); Priscilla & Prince (2009 ▶); Lu et al. (2010 ▶). For the structure of gallic acid monohydrate, see: Okabe et al. (2001 ▶); Jiang et al. (2000 ▶); Billes et al. (2007 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H6O5 M = 170.12 Monoclinic, a = 25.629 (2) Å b = 4.9211 (4) Å c = 11.2217 (9) Å β = 106.251 (1)° V = 1358.77 (19) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.15 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.30 × 0.19 × 0.11 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003 ▶) T min = 0.916, T max = 1.000 7171 measured reflections 1254 independent reflections 1172 reflections with I > 2s(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.032 wR(F 2) = 0.091 S = 1.06 1254 reflections 121 parameters 4 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2003 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008) ▶; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811007471/fj2397sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811007471/fj2397Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H6O5F(000) = 704
Mr = 170.12Dx = 1.663 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 3476 reflections
a = 25.629 (2) Åθ = 3.3–28.1°
b = 4.9211 (4) ŵ = 0.14 mm1
c = 11.2217 (9) ÅT = 293 K
β = 106.251 (1)°Hexagon, colourless
V = 1358.77 (19) Å30.30 × 0.19 × 0.11 mm
Z = 8
Bruker APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer1254 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1172 reflections with I > 2s(I)
graphiteRint = 0.022
Frames, each covering 0.3 ° in ω scansθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 1.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003)h = −30→30
Tmin = 0.916, Tmax = 1.000k = −5→5
7171 measured reflectionsl = −13→13
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.091H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.054P)2 + 0.7476P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1254 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
121 parametersΔρmax = 0.16 e Å3
4 restraintsΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against all reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on all data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.40390 (5)0.4849 (2)−0.00701 (11)0.0251 (3)
C20.40861 (5)0.6475 (3)0.09733 (11)0.0267 (3)
H2A0.43800.62710.16740.032*
C30.36900 (5)0.8389 (3)0.09502 (11)0.0256 (3)
C40.32438 (5)0.8667 (2)−0.00919 (11)0.0249 (3)
C50.32041 (5)0.7058 (2)−0.11289 (11)0.0247 (3)
C60.36006 (5)0.5156 (3)−0.11223 (12)0.0262 (3)
H6A0.35750.4083−0.18190.031*
C70.44558 (5)0.2786 (2)−0.00657 (11)0.0262 (3)
O10.36873 (4)1.0116 (2)0.18952 (9)0.0367 (3)
H10.3935 (6)0.969 (4)0.2539 (15)0.044*
O20.28434 (4)1.0485 (2)−0.01206 (10)0.0352 (3)
H20.2920 (6)1.127 (3)0.0553 (13)0.042*
O30.27680 (4)0.7268 (2)−0.21619 (9)0.0334 (3)
H30.2610 (7)0.872 (3)−0.2151 (16)0.040*
O40.48474 (4)0.2647 (2)0.09722 (9)0.0392 (3)
H40.5076 (7)0.143 (3)0.0928 (17)0.047*
O50.44465 (4)0.12950 (19)−0.09537 (8)0.0314 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0237 (6)0.0240 (6)0.0263 (6)0.0027 (5)0.0050 (5)0.0020 (5)
C20.0244 (6)0.0292 (7)0.0234 (6)0.0041 (5)0.0015 (5)0.0025 (5)
C30.0284 (6)0.0248 (6)0.0230 (6)0.0007 (5)0.0062 (5)0.0000 (5)
C40.0224 (6)0.0219 (6)0.0301 (7)0.0036 (5)0.0070 (5)0.0028 (5)
C50.0214 (6)0.0236 (6)0.0254 (6)−0.0008 (5)0.0005 (5)0.0018 (5)
C60.0260 (6)0.0252 (6)0.0256 (6)0.0021 (5)0.0042 (5)−0.0027 (5)
C70.0238 (6)0.0264 (7)0.0263 (6)0.0028 (5)0.0037 (5)0.0014 (5)
O10.0420 (6)0.0387 (6)0.0251 (5)0.0130 (4)0.0020 (4)−0.0060 (4)
O20.0309 (5)0.0345 (6)0.0369 (5)0.0131 (4)0.0038 (4)−0.0051 (4)
O30.0265 (5)0.0293 (5)0.0346 (5)0.0063 (4)−0.0074 (4)−0.0050 (4)
O40.0332 (5)0.0433 (6)0.0324 (5)0.0189 (4)−0.0054 (4)−0.0078 (4)
O50.0292 (5)0.0322 (5)0.0289 (5)0.0101 (4)0.0019 (4)−0.0037 (4)
C1—C61.3918 (17)C5—O31.3706 (14)
C1—C21.3951 (18)C5—C61.3800 (18)
C1—C71.4726 (17)C6—H6A0.9300
C2—C31.3796 (18)C7—O51.2325 (15)
C2—H2A0.9300C7—O41.3093 (15)
C3—O11.3606 (15)O1—H10.844 (14)
C3—C41.3949 (17)O2—H20.821 (14)
C4—O21.3551 (15)O3—H30.824 (14)
C4—C51.3874 (18)O4—H40.850 (15)
C6—C1—C2120.64 (11)O3—C5—C4121.15 (11)
C6—C1—C7119.36 (11)C6—C5—C4120.10 (11)
C2—C1—C7120.00 (11)C5—C6—C1119.77 (12)
C3—C2—C1119.02 (11)C5—C6—H6A120.1
C3—C2—H2A120.5C1—C6—H6A120.1
C1—C2—H2A120.5O5—C7—O4121.64 (11)
O1—C3—C2125.17 (11)O5—C7—C1123.91 (11)
O1—C3—C4114.22 (11)O4—C7—C1114.45 (11)
C2—C3—C4120.60 (11)C3—O1—H1110.2 (12)
O2—C4—C5118.66 (11)C4—O2—H2107.7 (12)
O2—C4—C3121.50 (11)C5—O3—H3109.9 (12)
C5—C4—C3119.85 (11)C7—O4—H4110.8 (12)
O3—C5—C6118.73 (11)
C6—C1—C2—C30.27 (19)O2—C4—C5—C6−178.95 (11)
C7—C1—C2—C3−179.80 (11)C3—C4—C5—C61.06 (19)
C1—C2—C3—O1−179.47 (12)O3—C5—C6—C1−178.09 (11)
C1—C2—C3—C41.08 (19)C4—C5—C6—C10.28 (19)
O1—C3—C4—O2−1.25 (18)C2—C1—C6—C5−0.96 (19)
C2—C3—C4—O2178.26 (11)C7—C1—C6—C5179.12 (11)
O1—C3—C4—C5178.74 (11)C6—C1—C7—O50.77 (19)
C2—C3—C4—C5−1.75 (19)C2—C1—C7—O5−179.16 (12)
O2—C4—C5—O3−0.62 (18)C6—C1—C7—O4−179.37 (11)
C3—C4—C5—O3179.39 (11)C2—C1—C7—O40.70 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O10.82 (1)2.19 (2)2.6625 (14)117 (1)
O3—H3···O20.82 (1)2.35 (2)2.7464 (14)110 (1)
O1—H1···O5i0.84 (1)1.89 (2)2.7324 (13)176 (2)
O3—H3···O3ii0.82 (1)2.04 (2)2.8167 (9)157 (2)
O4—H4···O5iii0.85 (2)1.81 (2)2.6570 (13)175 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O10.82 (1)2.19 (2)2.6625 (14)117 (1)
O3—H3⋯O20.82 (1)2.35 (2)2.7464 (14)110 (1)
O1—H1⋯O5i0.84 (1)1.89 (2)2.7324 (13)176 (2)
O3—H3⋯O3ii0.82 (1)2.04 (2)2.8167 (9)157 (2)
O4—H4⋯O5iii0.85 (2)1.81 (2)2.6570 (13)175 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  5 in total

1.  Gallic acid monohydrate.

Authors:  R W Jiang; D S Ming; P P But; T C Mak
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  Anticancer activity of phenolic acids of natural or synthetic origin: a structure-activity study.

Authors:  Catarina A Gomes; Teresa Girão da Cruz; José L Andrade; Nuno Milhazes; Fernanda Borges; M Paula M Marques
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Gallic acid suppresses cell viability, proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis in human glioma cells.

Authors:  Yong Lu; Feng Jiang; Hao Jiang; Kalina Wu; Xuguang Zheng; Yizhong Cai; Mark Katakowski; Michael Chopp; Shing-Shun Tony To
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.432

5.  Cardioprotective effect of gallic acid on cardiac troponin-T, cardiac marker enzymes, lipid peroxidation products and antioxidants in experimentally induced myocardial infarction in Wistar rats.

Authors:  D Hansi Priscilla; P Stanely Mainzen Prince
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 5.192

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  EPR spectral investigation of radiation-induced radicals of gallic acid.

Authors:  Hasan Tuner
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Gallic acid from Terminalia chebula inhibited the growth of esophageal carcinoma cells by suppressing the Hippo signal pathway.

Authors:  Gui-Li Sun; Dong Wang
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.699

3.  Complex Polymorphic System of Gallic Acid-Five Monohydrates, Three Anhydrates, and over 20 Solvates.

Authors:  Doris E Braun; Rajni M Bhardwaj; Alastair J Florence; Derek A Tocher; Sarah L Price
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 4.076

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.