Literature DB >> 21754039

3-(Pyridin-4-yl-thio)-pentane-2,4-dione.

Qing-Fu Zhang1, Jian-Dong Pang, De-Zhi Sun, Cai-Hua Liu.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(10)H(11)NO(2)S, the acetyl-acetone group crystallizes in the keto form with all the non-hydrogen atoms in the acetyl-acetone group approximately co-planar with a maximum atomic deviation 0.055 (2) Å; the dihedral angle between the acetyl-acetone group and the pyridine ring is 85.90 (6)°. An intra-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bond involving the acetyl-acetone group forms a six-membered ring.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21754039      PMCID: PMC3100059          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811011330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For applications of β-diketones and their derivatives in metallo-supra­molecular chemistry, see: Aromí et al. (2008 ▶); Chen et al. (2003 ▶; 2004 ▶); Domasevitch et al. (2006 ▶); Massue et al. (2005 ▶); Soldatov & Ripmeester (2001 ▶); Tabellion et al. (2001 ▶); Vigato et al. (2009 ▶); Vreshch et al. (2003 ▶, 2004 ▶); Won et al. (2007 ▶); Zhang et al. (2006 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H11NO2S M = 209.26 Monoclinic, a = 8.3273 (7) Å b = 9.5614 (8) Å c = 13.0681 (11) Å β = 92.698 (1)° V = 1039.34 (15) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.28 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.35 × 0.30 × 0.28 mm

Data collection

Siemens SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.907, T max = 0.925 5011 measured reflections 1822 independent reflections 1351 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.030

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.038 wR(F 2) = 0.120 S = 1.06 1822 reflections 130 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.17 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1996 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811011330/zj2007sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811011330/zj2007Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H11NO2SF(000) = 440
Mr = 209.26Dx = 1.337 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2174 reflections
a = 8.3273 (7) Åθ = 2.5–27.3°
b = 9.5614 (8) ŵ = 0.28 mm1
c = 13.0681 (11) ÅT = 298 K
β = 92.698 (1)°Block, yellow
V = 1039.34 (15) Å30.35 × 0.30 × 0.28 mm
Z = 4
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1822 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1351 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.030
phi and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.907, Tmax = 0.925k = −5→11
5011 measured reflectionsl = −15→15
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.120w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0562P)2 + 0.3241P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1822 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
130 parametersΔρmin = −0.18 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.136 (9)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.87871 (8)0.22005 (6)0.95516 (6)0.0688 (3)
O10.7336 (2)0.60208 (19)1.01493 (15)0.0761 (6)
H10.77150.62130.95470.091*
O20.8608 (2)0.60632 (19)0.85162 (14)0.0769 (6)
N10.4443 (3)−0.0271 (2)0.83293 (19)0.0714 (6)
C10.6930 (4)0.3985 (4)1.1103 (2)0.0863 (9)
H1A0.78130.36881.15500.129*
H1B0.63050.31851.08860.129*
H1C0.62660.46231.14610.129*
C20.7557 (3)0.4691 (3)1.01961 (19)0.0566 (6)
C30.8327 (3)0.3980 (2)0.94164 (17)0.0495 (6)
C40.8804 (3)0.4736 (3)0.85562 (18)0.0580 (6)
C50.9512 (4)0.4065 (4)0.7658 (2)0.0890 (10)
H5A1.00510.47590.72690.133*
H5B0.86740.36390.72350.133*
H5C1.02700.33630.78890.133*
C60.7057 (3)0.1310 (2)0.90682 (16)0.0466 (5)
C70.7102 (3)−0.0134 (2)0.90713 (19)0.0584 (6)
H70.8011−0.06070.93270.070*
C80.5786 (3)−0.0856 (3)0.8692 (2)0.0730 (8)
H80.5843−0.18270.86900.088*
C90.4412 (3)0.1119 (3)0.8347 (2)0.0630 (7)
H90.34740.15610.81070.076*
C100.5674 (3)0.1949 (2)0.86962 (18)0.0542 (6)
H100.55910.29190.86800.065*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0565 (4)0.0432 (4)0.1043 (6)0.0034 (3)−0.0216 (3)−0.0036 (3)
O10.0818 (13)0.0532 (11)0.0934 (14)0.0072 (9)0.0045 (10)−0.0142 (9)
O20.0901 (14)0.0563 (11)0.0827 (13)−0.0179 (10)−0.0131 (10)0.0166 (9)
N10.0674 (14)0.0546 (13)0.0923 (17)−0.0155 (11)0.0029 (12)−0.0121 (11)
C10.090 (2)0.095 (2)0.0750 (19)−0.0214 (18)0.0168 (15)−0.0053 (16)
C20.0498 (13)0.0525 (14)0.0668 (15)−0.0059 (10)−0.0058 (11)−0.0064 (11)
C30.0459 (12)0.0407 (12)0.0610 (14)−0.0075 (9)−0.0053 (10)−0.0053 (10)
C40.0484 (13)0.0634 (16)0.0614 (15)−0.0137 (11)−0.0080 (11)−0.0028 (12)
C50.080 (2)0.116 (3)0.0717 (19)−0.0176 (18)0.0129 (15)−0.0173 (17)
C60.0502 (13)0.0403 (12)0.0495 (12)−0.0014 (9)0.0039 (9)−0.0023 (9)
C70.0605 (15)0.0398 (12)0.0751 (16)0.0029 (10)0.0060 (12)0.0046 (11)
C80.076 (2)0.0402 (13)0.103 (2)−0.0097 (13)0.0085 (16)−0.0015 (13)
C90.0570 (14)0.0594 (16)0.0720 (16)−0.0022 (12)−0.0043 (12)−0.0048 (12)
C100.0577 (14)0.0413 (12)0.0630 (14)−0.0010 (10)−0.0044 (11)−0.0041 (10)
S1—C31.752 (2)C4—C51.484 (4)
S1—C61.764 (2)C5—H5A0.9600
O1—C21.286 (3)C5—H5B0.9600
O1—H10.8814C5—H5C0.9600
O2—C41.280 (3)C6—C101.373 (3)
N1—C81.318 (3)C6—C71.381 (3)
N1—C91.330 (3)C7—C81.368 (4)
C1—C21.480 (4)C7—H70.9300
C1—H1A0.9600C8—H80.9300
C1—H1B0.9600C9—C101.378 (3)
C1—H1C0.9600C9—H90.9300
C2—C31.404 (3)C10—H100.9300
C3—C41.409 (3)
C3—S1—C6105.16 (10)H5A—C5—H5B109.5
C2—O1—H1101.1C4—C5—H5C109.5
C8—N1—C9115.8 (2)H5A—C5—H5C109.5
C2—C1—H1A109.5H5B—C5—H5C109.5
C2—C1—H1B109.5C10—C6—C7117.9 (2)
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C10—C6—S1124.71 (17)
C2—C1—H1C109.5C7—C6—S1117.38 (17)
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C8—C7—C6118.8 (2)
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C8—C7—H7120.6
O1—C2—C3120.9 (2)C6—C7—H7120.6
O1—C2—C1115.7 (2)N1—C8—C7124.6 (2)
C3—C2—C1123.4 (2)N1—C8—H8117.7
C2—C3—C4119.1 (2)C7—C8—H8117.7
C2—C3—S1120.14 (18)N1—C9—C10124.5 (2)
C4—C3—S1120.67 (18)N1—C9—H9117.7
O2—C4—C3120.0 (2)C10—C9—H9117.7
O2—C4—C5116.8 (2)C6—C10—C9118.4 (2)
C3—C4—C5123.1 (3)C6—C10—H10120.8
C4—C5—H5A109.5C9—C10—H10120.8
C4—C5—H5B109.5
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O20.881.582.427 (3)161
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O20.881.582.427 (3)161
  9 in total

1.  Template and Guest Effects on the Self-Assembly of a Neutral and Homochiral Helix This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (CHE-9818472) and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through a Feodor Lynen Fellowship for F.M.T.

Authors:  Frank M. Tabellion; S. Russell Seidel; Atta M. Arif; Peter J. Stang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Solvent-dependent 4(4) square grid and 6(4).8(2) NbO frameworks formed by Cu(Pyac)2 (bis[3-(4-pyridyl)pentane-2,4-dionato]copper(II)).

Authors:  Banglin Chen; Frank R Fronczek; Andrew W Maverick
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Electroactive ligands: the first metal complexes of tetrathiafulvenyl-acetylacetonate.

Authors:  Julien Massue; Nathalie Bellec; Stéphanie Chopin; Eric Levillain; Thierry Roisnel; Rodolphe Clérac; Dominique Lorcy
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  Novel 4-vinylpyridine-extended metal-dibenzoylmethanate host frameworks: structure, polymorphism, and inclusion properties.

Authors:  D V Soldatov; J A Ripmeester
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2001-07-16       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  Two-dimensional square-grid frameworks formed by self-associating copper(II) complexes with 1-(3-pyridyl)- and 1-(4-pyridyl)-substituted butane-1,3-diones.

Authors:  Konstantin V Domasevitch; Volodimir D Vreshch; Andrey B Lysenko; Harald Krautscheid
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  Syntheses and structural characterizations of 24-membered dimetal (Mn, Ni, Fe) macrocyclic complexes and the C-S bond formation between acetylacetone and a mercapto N-heterocycle.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Zhang; Hui Chen; Chengbing Ma; Changneng Chen; Qiutian Liu
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 4.390

8.  Porous Cu-Cd mixed-metal-organic frameworks constructed from Cu(Pyac)2 [Bis[3-(4-pyridyl)pentane-2,4-dionato]copper(II)].

Authors:  Banglin Chen; Frank R Fronczek; Andrew W Maverick
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2004-12-27       Impact factor: 5.165

9.  Extended coordination frameworks incorporating heterobimetallic squares.

Authors:  Volodimir D Vreshch; Andrey B Lysenko; Alexander N Chernega; Judith A K Howard; Harald Krautscheid; Joachim Sieler; Konstantin V Domasevitch
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 4.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.