Literature DB >> 21753969

(μ-Ethane-1,1,2,2-tetra-carboxyl-ato)bis-[tetra-aqua-manganese(II)].

Meng-Wei Xue1, Chang-Yun Chen.   

Abstract

In the centrosymmetric title molecule, [Mn(2)(C(6)H(2)O(8))(H(2)O)(8)], the Mn(II) atom is in an octa-hedral environment coordinated by six O-atom donors from water mol-ecules and ethane-1,1,2,2-tetra-carboxyl-ate ligands. The crystal structure features a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonding network based on a strong and distinctive pattern of O-H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter-actions.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21753969      PMCID: PMC3099957          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811008063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature on metal–organic frameworks, see: Chen et al. (2007 ▶); Fan & Zhu (2006 ▶); Li & Yang (2006 ▶). For related literature on hydrogen bonding, see: Forster & Cheetham (2002 ▶); Kim & Jung (2000 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Mn2(C6H2O8)(H2O)8] M = 456.08 Triclinic, a = 6.2901 (12) Å b = 8.0212 (15) Å c = 8.0769 (15) Å α = 108.522 (3)° β = 95.068 (3)° γ = 97.086 (3)° V = 379.92 (12) Å3 Z = 1 Mo Kα radiation μ = 1.75 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.30 × 0.26 × 0.24 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.785, T max = 0.823 1956 measured reflections 1379 independent reflections 1309 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.044

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.026 wR(F 2) = 0.069 S = 1.05 1379 reflections 144 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.30 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811008063/pb2059sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811008063/pb2059Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Mn2(C6H2O8)(H2O)8]Z = 1
Mr = 456.08F(000) = 232.0
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.993 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.2901 (12) ÅCell parameters from 924 reflections
b = 8.0212 (15) Åθ = 2.2–20.2°
c = 8.0769 (15) ŵ = 1.75 mm1
α = 108.522 (3)°T = 293 K
β = 95.068 (3)°Block, brown
γ = 97.086 (3)°0.30 × 0.26 × 0.24 mm
V = 379.92 (12) Å3
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1379 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1309 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.044
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000)h = −6→7
Tmin = 0.785, Tmax = 0.823k = −9→9
1956 measured reflectionsl = −9→9
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.069H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0451P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1379 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
144 parametersΔρmax = 0.30 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.30 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Mn10.30762 (4)0.25813 (4)0.70315 (3)0.02040 (14)
O1−0.0280 (3)0.2382 (3)0.6000 (2)0.0407 (4)
O20.6555 (2)0.3118 (2)0.8276 (2)0.0249 (3)
O30.3825 (3)0.5167 (2)0.6758 (2)0.0388 (4)
O40.3632 (3)0.1354 (2)0.43505 (19)0.0293 (3)
O50.2172 (2)0.34158 (18)0.96515 (17)0.0238 (3)
O60.2933 (2)−0.00729 (18)0.72542 (18)0.0246 (3)
O70.1900 (2)0.28929 (19)1.21579 (17)0.0282 (3)
O80.3028 (2)−0.1656 (2)0.90616 (19)0.0297 (3)
C10.1621 (3)0.2406 (2)1.0530 (2)0.0186 (4)
C20.0577 (3)0.0477 (2)0.9454 (2)0.0184 (4)
H9−0.050 (3)0.053 (3)0.853 (3)0.022*
C30.2319 (3)−0.0512 (2)0.8542 (2)0.0192 (4)
H30.685 (4)0.421 (5)0.890 (4)0.046 (8)*
H40.669 (4)0.260 (4)0.883 (4)0.036 (8)*
H70.292 (4)0.177 (4)0.373 (3)0.034 (7)*
H80.475 (6)0.111 (5)0.400 (5)0.077 (12)*
H50.519 (9)0.581 (8)0.691 (7)0.15 (2)*
H1−0.108 (7)0.278 (6)0.663 (6)0.100 (15)*
H2−0.092 (6)0.175 (5)0.510 (5)0.067 (11)*
H60.332 (6)0.591 (6)0.719 (5)0.077 (13)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mn10.0220 (2)0.02101 (19)0.01841 (19)0.00202 (12)0.00384 (12)0.00706 (13)
O10.0267 (9)0.0621 (12)0.0257 (9)0.0078 (8)0.0007 (7)0.0045 (8)
O20.0274 (8)0.0220 (8)0.0251 (8)0.0022 (6)0.0024 (6)0.0086 (7)
O30.0508 (11)0.0237 (8)0.0427 (10)0.0047 (8)0.0128 (8)0.0110 (7)
O40.0338 (9)0.0375 (9)0.0210 (7)0.0145 (7)0.0088 (7)0.0114 (7)
O50.0331 (8)0.0176 (7)0.0200 (7)0.0006 (6)0.0069 (6)0.0059 (5)
O60.0310 (8)0.0234 (7)0.0234 (7)0.0073 (6)0.0126 (6)0.0098 (6)
O70.0389 (8)0.0245 (7)0.0180 (7)−0.0011 (6)0.0012 (6)0.0057 (6)
O80.0345 (8)0.0312 (8)0.0317 (8)0.0145 (6)0.0116 (6)0.0168 (6)
C10.0167 (9)0.0192 (9)0.0200 (9)0.0048 (7)0.0041 (7)0.0056 (7)
C20.0196 (9)0.0184 (9)0.0177 (9)0.0023 (7)0.0031 (7)0.0067 (7)
C30.0216 (9)0.0163 (9)0.0173 (9)0.0006 (7)0.0024 (7)0.0032 (7)
Mn1—O32.1541 (18)O3—H60.71 (4)
Mn1—O42.1552 (15)O4—H70.82 (3)
Mn1—O52.1578 (13)O4—H80.80 (4)
Mn1—O12.1674 (18)O5—C11.273 (2)
Mn1—O62.1845 (14)O6—C31.275 (2)
Mn1—O22.2557 (16)O7—C11.236 (2)
O1—H10.77 (4)O8—C31.237 (2)
O1—H20.78 (4)C1—C21.541 (3)
O2—H30.85 (3)C2—C2i1.515 (3)
O2—H40.71 (3)C2—C31.536 (2)
O3—H50.92 (6)C2—H90.98 (2)
O3—Mn1—O489.71 (7)Mn1—O3—H5126 (3)
O3—Mn1—O598.50 (6)Mn1—O3—H6123 (3)
O4—Mn1—O5170.75 (6)H5—O3—H696 (4)
O3—Mn1—O190.76 (8)Mn1—O4—H7107.7 (18)
O4—Mn1—O187.24 (7)Mn1—O4—H8128 (3)
O5—Mn1—O188.40 (6)H7—O4—H8113 (3)
O3—Mn1—O6169.57 (7)C1—O5—Mn1126.22 (12)
O4—Mn1—O686.03 (6)C3—O6—Mn1125.18 (11)
O5—Mn1—O686.55 (5)O7—C1—O5123.56 (17)
O1—Mn1—O698.54 (7)O7—C1—C2120.04 (16)
O3—Mn1—O284.27 (8)O5—C1—C2116.39 (16)
O4—Mn1—O296.98 (6)C2i—C2—C3112.65 (19)
O5—Mn1—O288.12 (6)C2i—C2—C1112.95 (19)
O1—Mn1—O2173.45 (7)C3—C2—C1108.56 (14)
O6—Mn1—O286.79 (6)C2i—C2—H9107.6 (13)
Mn1—O1—H1120 (3)C3—C2—H9107.4 (13)
Mn1—O1—H2129 (3)C1—C2—H9107.4 (15)
H1—O1—H2109 (4)O8—C3—O6124.24 (16)
Mn1—O2—H3107.8 (18)O8—C3—C2120.15 (16)
Mn1—O2—H4110 (2)O6—C3—C2115.61 (16)
H3—O2—H4109 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H3···O5ii0.85 (3)1.88 (3)2.726 (2)174 (3)
O2—H4···O8iii0.71 (3)2.07 (3)2.765 (2)166 (3)
O4—H7···O7iv0.82 (3)1.89 (3)2.689 (2)167 (2)
O4—H8···O6v0.80 (4)1.97 (4)2.757 (2)167 (4)
O3—H5···O7ii0.92 (6)1.95 (6)2.847 (2)165 (5)
O1—H1···O2vi0.77 (4)2.07 (4)2.818 (2)164 (5)
O1—H2···O6vii0.78 (4)2.14 (4)2.914 (2)175 (4)
O3—H6···O8viii0.71 (4)2.10 (4)2.771 (2)158 (4)
  6 in total

1.  Open-framework nickel succinate, [Ni(7)(C(4)H(4)O(4))(6)(OH)(2)(H(2)O)(2)].2 H(2)O: a new hybrid material with three-dimensional Ni-O-Ni Connectivity.

Authors:  Paul M Forster; Anthony K Cheetham
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Significantly enhanced hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks via spillover.

Authors:  Yingwei Li; Ralph T Yang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Influence of the reaction conditions on the self-assembly of lead(II) 5-sulfosalicylate coordination polymers with chelating amine ligands.

Authors:  Sai-Rong Fan; Long-Guan Zhu
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Single crystal-to-single crystal transformation from ferromagnetic discrete molecules to a spin-canting antiferromagnetic layer.

Authors:  Xiao-Ning Cheng; Wei-Xiong Zhang; Xiao-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

6.  Hydrothermal synthesis and magnetic behavior of a novel layered coordination polymer generated from manganese(II) adipate.

Authors:  Y Kim; D Y Jung
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2000-04-03       Impact factor: 5.165

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.