Literature DB >> 21753916

Evaluating information prescriptions in two clinical environments.

Kathleen Burr Oliver1, Harold P Lehmann, Antonio C Wolff, Laurie W Davidson, Pamela K Donohue, Maureen M Gilmore, Catherine Craven, Nancy K Roderer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The research sought to evaluate whether providing personalized information services by libraries can improve satisfaction with information services for specific types of patients.
METHODS: Adult breast cancer (BrCa) clinic patients and mothers of inpatient neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients were randomized to receive routine information services (control) or an IRx intervention.
RESULTS: The BrCa trial randomized 211 patients and the NICU trial, 88 mothers. The BrCa trial showed no statistically significant differences in satisfaction ratings between the treatment and control groups. The IRx group in the NICU trial reported higher satisfaction than the control group regarding information received about diagnosis, treatments, respiratory tradeoffs, and medication tradeoffs. BrCa patients posed questions to librarians more frequently than did NICU mothers, and a higher percentage reported using the website. Questions asked of the librarians by BrCa patients were predominantly clinical and focused on the areas of treatment and side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Study results provide some evidence to support further efforts to both implement information prescription projects in selected settings and to conduct additional research on the costs and benefits of services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21753916      PMCID: PMC3133905          DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 1536-5050


  25 in total

1.  SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: Simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores.

Authors:  D K Richardson; J D Corcoran; G J Escobar; S K Lee
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them.

Authors:  Shelia R Cotten; Sipi S Gupta
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Linking clinic patients to Internet-based, condition-specific information prescriptions.

Authors:  Emily Coberly; Suzanne Austin Boren; J Wade Davis; Amanda L McConnell; Rebecca Chitima-Matsiga; Bin Ge; Robert A Logan; William C Steinmann; Robert H Hodge
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2010-04

Review 4.  Bibliotherapy and information prescriptions: a summary of the published evidence-base and recommendations from past and ongoing Books on Prescription projects.

Authors:  D Chamberlain; D Heaps; I Robert
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.952

5.  Information Rx: Evaluation of a new informatics tool for physicians, patients, and libraries.

Authors:  Elliot R Siegel; Robert A Logan; Robert L Harnsberger; Kathleen Cravedi; Jean A Krause; Becky Lyon; Karen Hajarian; Jonathan Uhl; Angela Ruffin; Donald A B Lindberg
Journal:  Inf Serv Use       Date:  2006

6.  Using the internet to provide information prescriptions.

Authors:  Lee M Ritterband; Stephen Borowitz; Daniel J Cox; Boris Kovatchev; Lynn S Walker; Vanessa Lucas; James Sutphen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Developing an information prescription service.

Authors:  Annette Hand; Kate Greenwell; Sally Corbett; Richard Walker; Helen Kirrane
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  2008 Sep 30-Oct 6

8.  Information prescriptions: a barrier to fulfillment.

Authors:  Monica R Leisey; Jean P Shipman
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-10

9.  Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  K Beaver; K A Luker; R G Owens; S J Leinster; L F Degner; J A Sloan
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.592

10.  Real world use of an Internet intervention for pediatric encopresis.

Authors:  Lee M Ritterband; Kaveh Ardalan; Frances P Thorndike; Joshua C Magee; Drew K Saylor; Daniel J Cox; James L Sutphen; Stephen M Borowitz
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Information prescriptions, 1930-2013: an international history and comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michelynn McKnight
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2014-10

2.  Libraries and Librarians: Key Partners for Progress in Health Literacy Research and Practice.

Authors:  Wanda Whitney; Alla Keselman; Betsy Humphreys
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2017

3.  Personalization of health information prescription in diabetes clinical setting: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Abdolahad Nabiolahi; Shahram Sedghi; Rokhsareh Aghili; Leila Nemati-Anaraki
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-03-31

4.  Consumer Use of "Dr Google": A Survey on Health Information-Seeking Behaviors and Navigational Needs.

Authors:  Kenneth Lee; Kreshnik Hoti; Jeffery David Hughes; Lynne M Emmerton
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Development of a Questionnaire and Cross-Sectional Survey of Patient eHealth Readiness and eHealth Inequalities.

Authors:  Ray Jones
Journal:  Med 2 0       Date:  2013-09-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.