Literature DB >> 21753697

Giant pituitary adenomas: pathologic-radiographic correlations and lack of role for p53 and MIB-1 labeling.

Helen Madsen1, Thomas M Borges, Aaron J Knox, Katherine A Michaelis, Mei Xu, Kevin O Lillehei, Margaret E Wierman, Bette Kay Kleinschmidt-DeMasters.   

Abstract

Giant pituitary adenomas, with diameter ≥4 cm, were formerly considered rare and not surgically approachable. Few United States-based series exist. We reviewed our 10-year experience with these tumors and identified 17 patients, 11 male and 6 female, aged 27 to 65 years. Twelve of 17 cases were either gonadotroph or null cell adenomas and 5 were giant prolactinomas. By neuroimaging, all invaded the cavernous sinus(es) and tumors in 13 patients invaded the skull base. Despite massive size, only 5 showed apoplectic clinical and neuroimaging features. When present, this feature occasionally prompted preoperative consideration of craniopharyngioma. Transsphenoidal surgical excision was possible in all patients, with 3 undergoing planned second-stage reoperations and 2 requiring a second surgery for recurrence (both at 6-year intervals). Despite the aggressive features of massive size and cavernous sinus invasion, mitotic rates and immunohistochemistry (IHC) labeling for p53 and MIB-1, features alleged to be associated with atypical adenomas, were minimally increased. Absence of a role for TP53 and cell cycle markers was further verified on a subset of our cases by microarray and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses. Five giant gonadotroph adenomas were compared with 7 nonaggressive, nongiant gonadotroph cell adenomas, and no statistically significant changes in transcript levels of MIB-1 (MKI67) or TP53 were observed. A number of other genes, however, did show differential gene expression. In conclusion, most giant pituitary adenomas are gonadotroph cell adenomas or giant prolactinomas in men. Microarray profiling validates the IHC impression that MIB-1 and p53 IHC do not correlate with aggressive features in the most common type of giant adenoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21753697     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31821e8c96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  10 in total

Review 1.  Medically induced CSF rhinorrhea following treatment of macroprolactinoma: case series and literature review.

Authors:  Tomáš Česák; Pavel Poczos; Jaroslav Adamkov; Jiří Náhlovský; Petra Kašparová; Filip Gabalec; Petr Čelakovský; Ondrej Choutka
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Predictive modeling for pituitary adenomas: single center experience in 501 consecutive patients.

Authors:  A L Pappy; A Savinkina; C Bicknese; S Neill; N M Oyesiku; A G Ioachimescu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Giant prolactinomas larger than 60 mm in size: a cohort of massive and aggressive prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Ilan Shimon; Ernesto Sosa; Victoria Mendoza; Yona Greenman; Amit Tirosh; Etual Espinosa; Vera Popovic; Andrea Glezer; Marcello D Bronstein; Moises Mercado
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  Correlation between histological subtypes and MRI findings in clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nishioka; Naoko Inoshita; Toshiaki Sano; Noriaki Fukuhara; Shozo Yamada
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.943

5.  Three-dimensional volumetric measurements in defining endoscope-guided giant adenoma surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Muhammad Omar Chohan; Ariana M Levin; Ranjodh Singh; Zhiping Zhou; Carlos L Green; Jacob J Kazam; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  The impact of immunohistochemical markers of Ki-67 and p53 on the long-term outcome of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas: A cohort study.

Authors:  Maysam Alimohamadi; Vahid Ownagh; Leila Mahouzi; Afshin Ostovar; Kazem Abbassioun; Abbas Amirjmshidi
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

Review 7.  Histopathological classification of non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Emilija Manojlovic-Gacic; Britt Edén Engström; Olivera Casar-Borota
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Increased E2F1 mRNA and miR-17-5p Expression Is Correlated to Invasiveness and Proliferation of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumours.

Authors:  Araceli García-Martínez; Beatriz López-Muñoz; Carmen Fajardo; Rosa Cámara; Cristina Lamas; Sandra Silva-Ortega; Ignacio Aranda; Antonio Picó
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-16

9.  Histological criteria for atypical pituitary adenomas - data from the German pituitary adenoma registry suggests modifications.

Authors:  Christian P Miermeister; Stephan Petersenn; Michael Buchfelder; Rudolf Fahlbusch; Dieter K Lüdecke; Annett Hölsken; Markus Bergmann; Hans Ulrich Knappe; Volkmar H Hans; Jörg Flitsch; Wolfgang Saeger; Rolf Buslei
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 7.801

10.  Clinicopathological predictive factors in the early remission of corticotroph pituitary macroadenomas in a tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Przemysław Witek; Grzegorz Zieliński; Katarzyna Szamotulska; Maria Maksymowicz; Grzegorz Kamiński
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 6.664

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.