Literature DB >> 21753197

Effects of housing, perches, genetics, and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on keel bone deformities in laying hens.

S Käppeli1, S G Gebhardt-Henrich, E Fröhlich, A Pfulg, H Schäublin, M H Stoffel.   

Abstract

Several studies have shown a high prevalence of keel bone deformities in commercial laying hens. The aim of this project was to assess the effects of perch material, a vitamin D feed additive (25-hydroxyvitamin D(3); HyD, DSM Nutritional Products, Basel, Switzerland), and genetics on keel bone pathology. The study consisted of 2 experiments. In the first experiment, 4,000 Lohmann Selected Leghorn hens were raised in aviary systems until 18 wk of age. Two factors were investigated: perch material (plastic or rubber-coated metal) and feed (with and without HyD). Afterward, the hens were moved to a layer house with 8 pens with 2 aviary systems. Daily feed consumption, egg production, mortality, and feather condition were evaluated. Every 6 wk, the keel bones of 10 randomly selected birds per pen were palpated and scored. In the second experiment, 2,000 Lohmann Brown (LB) hens and 2,000 Lohmann Brown parent stock (LBPS) hens were raised in a manner identical to the first experiment. During the laying period, the hens were kept in 24 identical floor pens but equipped with different perch material (plastic or rubber-coated metal). The same variables were investigated as in the first experiment. No keel bone deformities were found during the rearing period in either experiment. During the laying period, deformities gradually appeared and reached a prevalence of 35% in the first experiment and 43.8% in the second experiment at the age of 65 and 62 wk, respectively. In the first experiment, neither HyD nor the aviary system had any significant effect on the prevalence of keel bone deformities. In the second experiment, LBPS had significantly fewer moderate and severe deformities than LB, and rubber-coated metal perches were associated with a higher prevalence of keel bone deformities compared with plastic perches. The LBPS laid more but smaller eggs than the LB. Again, HyD did not affect the prevalence of keel bone deformities. However, the significant effect of breed affiliation strongly indicates a sizeable genetic component that may provide a basis for targeted selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21753197     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  9 in total

1.  Soft perches in an aviary system reduce incidence of keel bone damage in laying hens.

Authors:  Ariane Stratmann; Ernst K F Fröhlich; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek; Lars Schrader; Michael J Toscano; Hanno Würbel; Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Limited Associations between Keel Bone Damage and Bone Properties Measured with Computer Tomography, Three-Point Bending Test, and Analysis of Minerals in Swiss Laying Hens.

Authors:  Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich; Andreas Pfulg; Ernst K F Fröhlich; Susanna Käppeli; Dominik Guggisberg; Annette Liesegang; Michael H Stoffel
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-08-11

3.  Keel fracture changed the behavior and reduced the welfare, production performance, and egg quality in laying hens housed individually in furnished cages.

Authors:  Haidong Wei; Yanju Bi; Hongwei Xin; Lei Pan; Runze Liu; Xiang Li; Jianhong Li; Runxiang Zhang; Jun Bao
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  No evidence that selection for egg production persistency causes loss of bone quality in laying hens.

Authors:  Ian C Dunn; Dirk-Jan De Koning; Heather A McCormack; Robert H Fleming; Peter W Wilson; Björn Andersson; Matthias Schmutz; Cristina Benavides; Nazaret Dominguez-Gasca; Estefania Sanchez-Rodriguez; Alejandro B Rodriguez-Navarro
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Early Onset of Laying and Bumblefoot Favor Keel Bone Fractures.

Authors:  Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich; Ernst K F Fröhlich
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  The Influence of Keel Bone Damage on Welfare of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Teresa M Casey-Trott; Mette S Herskin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-02-28

7.  Radiographic examination of keel bone damage in living laying hens of different strains kept in two housing systems.

Authors:  Beryl Katharina Eusemann; Ulrich Baulain; Lars Schrader; Christa Thöne-Reineke; Antonia Patt; Stefanie Petow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Role of Egg Production in the Etiology of Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Beryl Katharina Eusemann; Antonia Patt; Lars Schrader; Steffen Weigend; Christa Thöne-Reineke; Stefanie Petow
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-02-21

9.  Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Ida C N Thøfner; Jan Dahl; Jens Peter Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.