Literature DB >> 21752365

The outcome of British combat amputees in relation to military service.

Shreshth Dharm-Datta1, John Etherington, Alan Mistlin, Jonathan Rees, Jonathan Clasper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to determine the outcome, in relation to military service in UK military combat amputees. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Casualties were assessed at mean 2.4 years after injury and graded by a Functional Activity Assessment (FAA) ranging from 1 (fully fit) to 5 (unfit all duties) to score vocational functional outcome. ISS were calculated and the patients were categorised as having unilateral or multiple amputations. The Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) was completed.
RESULTS: Of the 52, 8 patients had left the forces by medical discharge, with 44 continuing to serve. 33 of the 44 had returned to work. 50 patients had FAA grades and were at least 7.6 months post-injury. No patients were graded as FAA1, 8 as FAA2, 18 as FAA3, 19 as FAA4 and 5 as FAA5. There was a trend for the FAA score to increase with injury severity, as measured by ISS i.e. vocational functional outcome was worse with more severe injuries, although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.095). Multiple amputee patients had significantly higher FAA grades (p<0.001) and were all FAA 4 or 5. Of the 33 patients who had returned to work, 8 were FAA2, 12 FAA3 and 12 FAA4. The mean SF-36 scores for Physical Component Summary (PCS) increased significantly from 36.4 to 43.4 (p=0.001) with rehabilitation, while Mental Component Summary (MCS) was 53.0 and remained similar at 53.6 (p=0.987). MCS scores were similar in these patients to the normal population, 50 (SD 10).
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to report the outcomes, with regards to return to work, of the UK military amputees injured in Afghanistan and Iraq Soldiers are surviving more severe and complex injuries than before and the majority are able to return successfully to military work. SF-36 PCS scores improve significantly with rehabilitation, and while MCS scores remain constant, the initial assessments are comparable with a normal population.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21752365     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

Review 1.  Factors Influencing Functional Outcomes and Return-to-Work After Amputation: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Benjamin J Darter; Carolyn E Hawley; Amy J Armstrong; Lauren Avellone; Paul Wehman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-12

Review 2.  What Is the Magnitude and Long-term Economic Cost of Care of the British Military Afghanistan Amputee Cohort?

Authors:  D S Edwards; Rhodri D Phillip; Nick Bosanquet; Anthony M J Bull; Jon C Clasper
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Incidence and demographic characteristics of Syrian Civil War-related amputations: A multi-center study.

Authors:  Yaşar Tatar; Nilüfer Kablan; Mevlit Yurtseven
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-04

4.  Comparing the surgical timelines of military and civilians traumatic lower limb amputations.

Authors:  R M T Staruch; P C Jackson; J Hodson; G Yim; M A Foster; T Cubison; S L A Jeffery
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-15

5.  Study protocol for a prospective, longitudinal cohort study investigating the medical and psychosocial outcomes of UK combat casualties from the Afghanistan war: the ADVANCE Study.

Authors:  Alexander N Bennett; Daniel Mark Dyball; Christopher J Boos; Nicola T Fear; Susie Schofield; Anthony M J Bull; Paul Cullinan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.