BACKGROUND: Detecting cervical spine injuries in trauma patients is essential because undetected injuries in the this area may result in severe neurological disability and probably quadriplegia. Thus, radiography of the cervical spine is considered mandatory in the initial evaluation of trauma patients according to Advanced Trauma Life Support. This approach results in many unnecessary normal radiographs. Therefore, we performed this study to determine the role of routine cervical radiography in the initial evaluation of stable high-energy blunt trauma patients. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study including all hemodynamically stable high-energy blunt trauma patients with negative cervical physical examinations referred to our trauma center during a 5-month period (May to September 2010). Cervical radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging were performed and reviewed for abnormalities. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,679 high-energy blunt trauma patients were referred to our center, of which 400 were hemodynamically stable and had negative cervical physical examinations. Cervical radiographs were found to be normal in all patients. CONCLUSION: Cross-table cervical spine radiographs can be limited to those high-energy blunt trauma patients who have a positive cervical physical examination or those in whom the physical examination is not revealing. These radiographs also have low value for detecting occult cervical spine fractures, and CT imaging is considered the modality of choice in these cases.
BACKGROUND: Detecting cervical spine injuries in traumapatients is essential because undetected injuries in the this area may result in severe neurological disability and probably quadriplegia. Thus, radiography of the cervical spine is considered mandatory in the initial evaluation of traumapatients according to Advanced Trauma Life Support. This approach results in many unnecessary normal radiographs. Therefore, we performed this study to determine the role of routine cervical radiography in the initial evaluation of stable high-energy blunt traumapatients. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study including all hemodynamically stable high-energy blunt traumapatients with negative cervical physical examinations referred to our trauma center during a 5-month period (May to September 2010). Cervical radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging were performed and reviewed for abnormalities. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,679 high-energy blunt traumapatients were referred to our center, of which 400 were hemodynamically stable and had negative cervical physical examinations. Cervical radiographs were found to be normal in all patients. CONCLUSION: Cross-table cervical spine radiographs can be limited to those high-energy blunt traumapatients who have a positive cervical physical examination or those in whom the physical examination is not revealing. These radiographs also have low value for detecting occult cervical spine fractures, and CT imaging is considered the modality of choice in these cases.