Literature DB >> 21750964

Pathological complete response rates following different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for operable breast cancer according to ER status, in two parallel, randomized phase II trials with an adaptive study design (ECTO II).

Milvia Zambetti1, Mauro Mansutti, Patricia Gomez, Ana Lluch, Christian Dittrich, Claudio Zamagni, Eva Ciruelos, Lorenzo Pavesi, Vladimir Semiglazov, Elena De Benedictis, Fernando Gaion, Mario Bari, Paolo Morandi, Pinuccia Valagussa, Gianni Luca.   

Abstract

Sequential doxorubicin/paclitaxel (AT) followed by CMF treatment was shown to be an active neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen in the first European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer (ECTO I trial). The aim of the current study (ECTO II) is to assess the complete pathological response (pCR) rate following three different anthracycline and taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens, with or without capecitabine (X). Patients with operable, invasive breast cancer > 2.0 cm in diameter, were randomized to AT→CMF, AT→CMX or AC→TX regimens in two parallel, randomized, open-label, phase II trials (within a single study) in patients with estrogen receptor negative (ER-) and estrogen receptor positive (ER+) diseases, respectively. Exemestane was delivered concomitantly with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ tumors. Achievement of pCR was more common in ER- than ER+ women (45.3 vs. 10.4%). Capecitabine was only associated with a higher frequency of pCR in ER+ patients receiving AT→CMX. Overall response rates (ORR) ranged from 88 to 97%, and this translated into high rates of breast-conserving surgery (67% of ER- patients and 72% of ER+ patients). All three regimens were well tolerated. Febrile neutropenia and gastrointestinal effects were the most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events. As expected, the ECTO II study showed higher pCR rates in patients with ER- disease. Substituting capecitabine for fluorouracil (± methotrexate) in anthracycline/taxane-containing regimens appeared to be beneficial only in ER+ tumors. Translational studies investigating interactions between therapeutic agents and tumor biology are warranted to refine patient selection and improve the results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21750964     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1660-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of biomarker changes after administration of various neoadjuvant chemotherapies in breast cancer.

Authors:  Guangchao Jin; Yu Han; Cun Liu; Liansheng Chen; Butong Ding; Shijin Xuan; Xianqiang Liu; Guohui Ma; Jun Gao; Xingsong Tian
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-01-01

2.  Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer Patients with Progressive Disease during Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jacques Raphael; S Nofech-Mozes; T Paramsothy; N Li; S Gandhi
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Association of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio with ER and PR in breast cancer patients and their changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  J Xu; C Ni; C Ma; L Zhang; X Jing; C Li; Y Liu; X Qu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  A M Thompson; S L Moulder-Thompson
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  What is the burden of axillary disease after neoadjuvant therapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer?

Authors:  C Cox; C M Holloway; A Shaheta; S Nofech-Mozes; F C Wright
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  MicroRNAs as therapeutic targets in breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Fahima Danesh Pouya; Yousef Rasmi; Maria Gazouli; Eleni Zografos; Mohadeseh Nemati
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.617

7.  Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Siao-Nge Hoon; Peter Kh Lau; Alison M White; Max K Bulsara; Patricia D Banks; Andrew D Redfern
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 8.  Effect of targeted agents on the endocrine response of breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting: a systematic review.

Authors:  Antonino Grassadonia; Marta Caporale; Nicola Tinari; Marinella Zilli; Michele DeTursi; Teresa Gamucci; Patrizia Vici; Clara Natoli
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Increased pathological complete response rate after a long-term neoadjuvant letrozole treatment in postmenopausal oestrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  G Allevi; C Strina; D Andreis; V Zanoni; L Bazzola; S Bonardi; C Foroni; M Milani; M R Cappelletti; F Gussago; S Aguggini; R Giardini; M Martinotti; S B Fox; A L Harris; A Bottini; A Berruti; D Generali
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Clinical efficacy of including capecitabine in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Qiuyun Li; Yi Jiang; Wei Wei; Huawei Yang; Jianlun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.