Literature DB >> 21750496

Shape memory polymers for active cell culture.

Kevin A Davis1, Xiaofan Luo, Patrick T Mather, James H Henderson.   

Abstract

Shape memory polymers (SMPs) are a class of "smart" materials that have the ability to change from a fixed, temporary shape to a pre-determined permanent shape upon the application of a stimulus such as heat(1-5). In a typical shape memory cycle, the SMP is first deformed at an elevated temperature that is higher than its transition temperature, T(trans;) [either the melting temperature (T(m;)) or the glass transition temperature (T(g;))]. The deformation is elastic in nature and mainly leads to a reduction in conformational entropy of the constituent network chains (following the rubber elasticity theory). The deformed SMP is then cooled to a temperature below its T(trans;) while maintaining the external strain or stress constant. During cooling, the material transitions to a more rigid state (semi-crystalline or glassy), which kinetically traps or "freezes" the material in this low-entropy state leading to macroscopic shape fixing. Shape recovery is triggered by continuously heating the material through T(trans;) under a stress-free (unconstrained) condition. By allowing the network chains (with regained mobility) to relax to their thermodynamically favored, maximal-entropy state, the material changes from the temporary shape to the permanent shape. Cells are capable of surveying the mechanical properties of their surrounding environment(6). The mechanisms through which mechanical interactions between cells and their physical environment control cell behavior are areas of active research. Substrates of defined topography have emerged as powerful tools in the investigation of these mechanisms. Mesoscale, microscale, and nanoscale patterns of substrate topography have been shown to direct cell alignment, cell adhesion, and cell traction forces(7-14). These findings have underscored the potential for substrate topography to control and assay the mechanical interactions between cells and their physical environment during cell culture, but the substrates used to date have generally been passive and could not be programmed to change significantly during culture. This physical stasis has limited the potential of topographic substrates to control cells in culture. Here, active cell culture (ACC) SMP substrates are introduced that employ surface shape memory to provide programmed control of substrate topography and deformation. These substrates demonstrate the ability to transition from a temporary grooved topography to a second, nearly flat memorized topography. This change in topography can be used to control cell behavior under standard cell culture conditions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21750496      PMCID: PMC3196189          DOI: 10.3791/2903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  7 in total

1.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force.

Authors:  John L Tan; Joe Tien; Dana M Pirone; Darren S Gray; Kiran Bhadriraju; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface.

Authors:  Molly M Stevens; Julian H George
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reversible on-demand cell alignment using reconfigurable microtopography.

Authors:  Mai T Lam; William C Clem; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Dynamic cell behavior on shape memory polymer substrates.

Authors:  Kevin A Davis; Kelly A Burke; Patrick T Mather; James H Henderson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility.

Authors:  R J Pelham; Y l Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Force mapping in epithelial cell migration.

Authors:  Olivia du Roure; Alexandre Saez; Axel Buguin; Robert H Austin; Philippe Chavrier; Pascal Silberzan; Pascal Siberzan; Benoit Ladoux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates.

Authors:  Ana I Teixeira; Paul F Nealey; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.396

  7 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic manipulation of hydrogels to control cell behavior: a review.

Authors:  Kanika Vats; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Automated, contour-based tracking and analysis of cell behaviour over long time scales in environments of varying complexity and cell density.

Authors:  Richard M Baker; Megan E Brasch; M Lisa Manning; James H Henderson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Shape memory activation can affect cell seeding of shape memory polymer scaffolds designed for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Megan E Brasch; Richard M Baker; Ling-Fang Tseng; Alexis N Peña; James H Henderson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  On-command on/off switching of progenitor cell and cancer cell polarized motility and aligned morphology via a cytocompatible shape memory polymer scaffold.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Andy Quach; Megan E Brasch; Christopher E Turner; James H Henderson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Static and Dynamic Biomaterial Engineering for Cell Modulation.

Authors:  Hyung-Joon Park; Hyunsik Hong; Ramar Thangam; Min-Gyo Song; Ju-Eun Kim; Eun-Hae Jo; Yun-Jeong Jang; Won-Hyoung Choi; Min-Young Lee; Heemin Kang; Kyu-Back Lee
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 5.719

6.  Preparation of Monodomain Liquid Crystal Elastomers and Liquid Crystal Elastomer Nanocomposites.

Authors:  Hojin Kim; Bohan Zhu; Huiying Chen; Oluwatomiyin Adetiba; Aditya Agrawal; Pulickel Ajayan; Jeffrey G Jacot; Rafael Verduzco
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Nuclear position relative to the Golgi body and nuclear orientation are differentially responsive indicators of cell polarized motility.

Authors:  Megan E Brasch; Giuseppe Passucci; Anushree C Gulvady; Christopher E Turner; M Lisa Manning; James H Henderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.