Literature DB >> 21750113

Analytical error and interference in immunoassay: minimizing risk.

Catharine M Sturgeon1, Adie Viljoen.   

Abstract

Although generally robust, immunoassays remain vulnerable to occasional analytical errors that may have serious implications for patient care. Sporadic errors that occur as a result of properties of the specimen are particularly difficult to detect. They may be due to the presence of cross-reacting substances, antianalyte antibodies or antireagent antibodies, all of which may lead to erroneously high or low results. Low results may be observed for tumour markers due to high-dose hooking in the presence of very high analyte concentrations. Erroneous results can occur unexpectedly with any specimen and there is no practical means of identifying specimens likely to cause problems in immunoassays. The possibility of interference should always be considered when results do not appear to be in accord with the clinical picture. Errors can occur in even the best-managed laboratories and their early investigation is always desirable. If there is any doubt whatsoever about a result, clinical staff should be encouraged to contact the laboratory. Investigations for possible interference that can be undertaken in most laboratories include testing for linearity on dilution, recovery experiments, treatment with heterophilic blocking tubes and confirmation using a different method. It may be desirable to consult specialist laboratories if more complex studies are necessary. Informing clinical and laboratory staff of the ever-present possibility of unexpected interference, ensuring brief clinical details are available to laboratory staff, and above all facilitating excellent communication between laboratory and clinical staff are key to minimizing the risk of clinical mismanagement due to unsuspected interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21750113     DOI: 10.1258/acb.2011.011073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  35 in total

1.  Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification.

Authors:  Nathan P Manes; Jessica M Mann; Aleksandra Nita-Lazar
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Analytical Interference, Who Should Assess Kits?

Authors:  Jude Joseph Fleming
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2015-07

3.  Interference in ACTH immunoassay negatively impacts the management of subclinical hypercortisolism.

Authors:  Serkan Yener; Leyla Demir; Mustafa Demirpence; Mustafa Mahmut Baris; Ilgin Yildirim Simsir; Secil Ozisik; Abdurrahman Comlekci; Tevfik Demir
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  The use of mass spectrometry to improve the diagnosis and the management of the HPA axis.

Authors:  Phillip J Monaghan; Brian G Keevil; Peter J Trainer
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  Development and validation of an ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for quantitation of total 3,3',5-triiodo-L-thyronine and 3,3',5,5'-tetraiodo-L-thyronine in rodent serum.

Authors:  Suramya Waidyanatha; Brenda L Fletcher; Reshan A Fernando; Michelle C Cora; Melanie A Rehder Silinski
Journal:  Anal Lett       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Recurrent hypoglycemia from insulin autoimmune syndrome.

Authors:  Sophia L Wong; Anne Priestman; Daniel T Holmes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Hypeprolactinemia: still an insidious diagnosis.

Authors:  Ludovica Aliberti; Irene Gagliardi; Romolo M Dorizzi; Stefano Pizzicotti; Marta Bondanelli; Maria Chiara Zatelli; Maria Rosaria Ambrosio
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Interpretation of hormone levels in older patients: points for consideration.

Authors:  Krystyna Sztefko; Patrycja Szybowska
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.257

9.  Comparisons of immunoassay and mass spectrometry measurements of serum estradiol levels and their influence on clinical association studies in men.

Authors:  Claes Ohlsson; Maria E Nilsson; Asa Tivesten; Henrik Ryberg; Dan Mellström; Magnus K Karlsson; Östen Ljunggren; Fernand Labrie; Eric S Orwoll; David M Lee; Stephen R Pye; Terence W O'Neill; Joseph D Finn; Judith E Adams; Kate A Ward; Steven Boonen; Gyorgy Bartfai; Felipe F Casanueva; Gianni Forti; Aleksander Giwercman; Thang S Han; Ilpo T Huhtaniemi; Krzysztof Kula; Michael E J Lean; Neil Pendleton; Margus Punab; Dirk Vanderschueren; Frederick C W Wu; Liesbeth Vandenput
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  A simple set of validation steps identifies and removes false results in a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay caused by anti-animal IgG antibodies in plasma from arthritis patients.

Authors:  Tue W Kragstrup; Thomas Vorup-Jensen; Bent Deleuran; Malene Hvid
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.