Piroska A Bisits Bullen1. 1. Walden University, Minneapolis, USA. piroska.bisits-bullen@waldenu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Positive Deviance/Hearth approach aims to rehabilitate malnourished children using practices from mothers in the community who have well-nourished children despite living in poverty. This study assesses its effectiveness in a range of settings. METHODS: Systematic review of peer reviewed intervention trials and grey literature evaluation reports of child malnutrition programs using the Positive Deviance/Hearth approach. RESULTS: Ten peer reviewed studies and 14 grey literature reports met the inclusion criteria. These described results for 17 unique Positive Deviance/Hearth programs in 12 countries. Nine programs used a pre- and post-test design without a control, which limited the conclusions that could be drawn. Eight used more robust designs such as non-randomized trials, non-randomized cross-sectional sibling studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Of the eight programs that reported nutritional outcomes, five reported some type of positive result in terms of nutritional status - although the improvement was not always as large as predicted, or across the entire target population. Both the two RCTs demonstrated improvements in carer feeding practices. Qualitative results unanimously reported high levels of satisfaction from participants and recipient communities. CONCLUSIONS: Overall this study shows mixed results in terms of program effectiveness, although some Positive Deviance/Hearth programs have clearly been successful in particular settings. Sibling studies suggest that the Positive Deviance/Hearth approach may have a role in preventing malnutrition, not just rehabilitation. Further research is needed using more robust study designs and larger sample sizes. Issues related to community participation and consistency in reporting results need to be addressed.
OBJECTIVES: The Positive Deviance/Hearth approach aims to rehabilitate malnourished children using practices from mothers in the community who have well-nourished children despite living in poverty. This study assesses its effectiveness in a range of settings. METHODS: Systematic review of peer reviewed intervention trials and grey literature evaluation reports of child malnutrition programs using the Positive Deviance/Hearth approach. RESULTS: Ten peer reviewed studies and 14 grey literature reports met the inclusion criteria. These described results for 17 unique Positive Deviance/Hearth programs in 12 countries. Nine programs used a pre- and post-test design without a control, which limited the conclusions that could be drawn. Eight used more robust designs such as non-randomized trials, non-randomized cross-sectional sibling studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Of the eight programs that reported nutritional outcomes, five reported some type of positive result in terms of nutritional status - although the improvement was not always as large as predicted, or across the entire target population. Both the two RCTs demonstrated improvements in carer feeding practices. Qualitative results unanimously reported high levels of satisfaction from participants and recipient communities. CONCLUSIONS: Overall this study shows mixed results in terms of program effectiveness, although some Positive Deviance/Hearth programs have clearly been successful in particular settings. Sibling studies suggest that the Positive Deviance/Hearth approach may have a role in preventing malnutrition, not just rehabilitation. Further research is needed using more robust study designs and larger sample sizes. Issues related to community participation and consistency in reporting results need to be addressed.
Authors: Kathryn L Braun; Claudio R Nigg; Marie K Fialkowski; Jean Butel; James R Hollyer; L Robert Barber; Andrea Bersamin; Patricia Coleman; Ursula Teo-Martin; Agnes M Vargo; Rachel Novotny Journal: Child Obes Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Kiffer G Card; Nathan J Lachowsky; Zishan Cui; Paul Sereda; Ashleigh Rich; Jody Jollimore; Terry Howard; Robert Birch; Allison Carter; Julio Montaner; David Moore; Robert S Hogg; Eric Abella Roth Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-05
Authors: Sarah Gimbel; Joachim Voss; Alison Rustagi; Mary Anne Mercer; Brenda Zierler; Stephen Gloyd; Maria de Joana Coutinho; Maria de Fatima Cuembelo; Kenneth Sherr Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 5.396