Literature DB >> 21748414

The next wave: confexting.

Shah Lm1, Quigley Ep, Wiggins Rh.   

Abstract

Radiology conferences enable participants the opportunity to ask experts questions through question and answer (Q and A) sessions or individually. Given the time limitations and intimidating circumstances, we incorporated conference text messaging (confexting) as a method of increasing interactivity between the audience and speakers. During a 5-day radiology conference, text messaging was utilized for anonymous interactivity between the audience and speakers during Q and A sessions. There were 324 text messages; 76 of these were either follow-up statements or questions related to earlier text messages. Forty-two questions were submitted via paper notes. There was a general trend of an increasing number of text messages and a decreasing number of paper notes. The anonymous text messaging system was found to be an effective method for interactivity between the audience and the speakers. The questions and answers could be presented in a PowerPoint format at the formal Q and A sessions. Questions texted to the authors during their talks could be immediately answered or addressed in subsequent talks. Although difficult for some individuals to embrace technology, confexting allows for interactivity and prompts discussion. Confexting is an effective method for interactivity between the audience and speakers not previously utilized in a conference setting. The anonymity and asynchronous communication enable conference participants to submit more questions than in the traditional setting. The speakers may be able to explain more thoroughly difficult concepts more thoroughly with additional slides at Q and A sessions or may immediately answer texted questions during their talks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21748414      PMCID: PMC3264710          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9398-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  6 in total

1.  Distributed medical informatics education using internet2.

Authors:  Patrica J Tidmarsh; Joseph Cummings; William R Hersh; Charles P Freidman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

Review 2.  Radiology teaching presentation tools.

Authors:  H Christian Davidson; Richard H Wiggins
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Personal digital assistants.

Authors:  Richard H Wiggins
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  The impact of E-learning in medical education.

Authors:  Jorge G Ruiz; Michael J Mintzer; Rosanne M Leipzig
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Radiology education in 2005: world wide web practice patterns, perceptions, and preferences of radiologists.

Authors:  Melissa R Rowell; Pamela T Johnson; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Measuring continuing medical education outcomes: a pilot study of effect size of three CME interventions at an SGIM annual meeting.

Authors:  Saul J Weiner; Jeffrey L Jackson; Sarajane Garten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 5.128

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.