BACKGROUND: Many variants of dermatofibromas have been described, and being aware of the variants of dermatofibromas is important to avoid misdiagnosis. OBJECTIVE: We wanted to evaluate the clinical and pathologic characteristics of 122 cases of dermatofibromas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and 122 biopsy specimens of 92 patients who were diagnosed with dermatofibroma in the Department of Dermatology at Eulji Hospital of Eulji University between January 2000 and March 2010. RESULTS: Nearly 80% of the cases occurred between the ages of 20 and 49 years, with an overall predominance of females. Over 70% of the lesions were found on the extremities. The most common histologic variant was a fibrocollagenous dermatofibroma (40.1%). Other variants included histiocytic (13.1%), cellular (11.5%), aneurysmal (7.4%), angiomatous (6.5%), sclerotic (6.5%), monster (4.9%), palisading (1.6%) and keloidal dermatofibromas (0.8%). There were 9 dermatofibromas (7.3%) that were the mixed type with two co-dominant histologic features. CONCLUSION: The results of this study are consistent with previous reports on the clinical features of dermatofibromas. However, we observed several characteristic subtypes of dermatofibroma and we compared the frequency of the histologic subtypes.
BACKGROUND: Many variants of dermatofibromas have been described, and being aware of the variants of dermatofibromas is important to avoid misdiagnosis. OBJECTIVE: We wanted to evaluate the clinical and pathologic characteristics of 122 cases of dermatofibromas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and 122 biopsy specimens of 92 patients who were diagnosed with dermatofibroma in the Department of Dermatology at Eulji Hospital of Eulji University between January 2000 and March 2010. RESULTS: Nearly 80% of the cases occurred between the ages of 20 and 49 years, with an overall predominance of females. Over 70% of the lesions were found on the extremities. The most common histologic variant was a fibrocollagenous dermatofibroma (40.1%). Other variants included histiocytic (13.1%), cellular (11.5%), aneurysmal (7.4%), angiomatous (6.5%), sclerotic (6.5%), monster (4.9%), palisading (1.6%) and keloidal dermatofibromas (0.8%). There were 9 dermatofibromas (7.3%) that were the mixed type with two co-dominant histologic features. CONCLUSION: The results of this study are consistent with previous reports on the clinical features of dermatofibromas. However, we observed several characteristic subtypes of dermatofibroma and we compared the frequency of the histologic subtypes.
Authors: A Antal; B Zelger; J Reifenberger; T Niehues; O Feyen; M Megahed; T Ruzicka; B Homey Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2007-06-26 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: Min Soo Jang; Jae Woo Baek; Jong Bin Park; Dong Young Kang; Jin Seuk Kang; Sang Tae Kim; Kee Suck Suh Journal: Ann Dermatol Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 1.444
Authors: Felipe Maurício Soeiro Sampaio; Gustavo Vieira Gualberto; Fernando Gustavo Mósca de Cerqueira; Ana Maria Mósca de Cerqueira; Curt Mafra Treu; Thiago Jeunon de Sousa Vargas Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.896
Authors: João Vítor Pina Alves; Diogo Miguel Matos; Hugo Frederico Barreiros; Elvira Augusta Felgueira Leonardo Fernandes Bártolo Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.896