Literature DB >> 21746746

Estimating forest net primary production under changing climate: adding pests into the equation.

E A Pinkard1, M Battaglia, S Roxburgh, A P O'Grady.   

Abstract

The current approach to modelling pest impacts on forest net primary production (NPP) is to apply a constant modifier. This does not capture the large spatial and temporal variability in pest abundance and activity that can occur, meaning that overestimates or underestimates of pest impacts on forest NPP are likely. Taking a more mechanistic approach that incorporates an understanding of how physiology is influenced by pest attack, enables us to better capture system feedbacks and dynamics, thereby improving the capacity to predict into novel situations such as changing climate, and to account for both changes in pest activity and host responses to the growing environment now and into the future. We reviewed the effects of pests on forest NPP and found a range of responses and physiological mechanisms underlying those responses. Pest outbreaks can clearly be a major perturbation to forest NPP, and it seems likely that the frequency and intensity of pest outbreaks, and the ways in which host species respond to pest damage, will change in the future. We summarized these impacts in the form of a conceptual model at leaf, tree and stand scales, and compared the physiological processes embedded within that framework with the capacity of a representative range of NPP models to capture those processes. We found that some models can encapsulate some of the processes, but no model can comprehensively account for the range of physiological responses to pest attack experienced by trees. This is not surprising, given the paucity of empirical data for most of the world's forests, and that the models were developed primarily for other purposes. We conclude with a list of the key physiological processes and pathways that need to be included in forest growth models in order to adequately capture pest impacts on forest NPP under current and future climate scenarios, the equations that might enable this and the empirical data required to support them.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21746746     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpr054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  7 in total

1.  Interactive effects of pre-industrial, current and future [CO2] and temperature on an insect herbivore of Eucalyptus.

Authors:  T J Murray; D T Tissue; D S Ellsworth; M Riegler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Powdery Mildew Decreases the Radial Growth of Oak Trees with Cumulative and Delayed Effects over Years.

Authors:  Didier Bert; Jean-Baptiste Lasnier; Xavier Capdevielle; Aline Dugravot; Marie-Laure Desprez-Loustau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Forest carbon allocation modelling under climate change.

Authors:  Katarína Merganičová; Ján Merganič; Aleksi Lehtonen; Giorgio Vacchiano; Maša Zorana Ostrogović Sever; Andrey L D Augustynczik; Rüdiger Grote; Ina Kyselová; Annikki Mäkelä; Rasoul Yousefpour; Jan Krejza; Alessio Collalti; Christopher P O Reyer
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.196

4.  Whole-plant versus leaf-level regulation of photosynthetic responses after partial defoliation in Eucalyptus globulus saplings.

Authors:  Alieta Eyles; Elizabeth A Pinkard; Noel W Davies; Ross Corkrey; Keith Churchill; Anthony P O'Grady; Peter Sands; Caroline Mohammed
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Are forest disturbances amplifying or canceling out climate change-induced productivity changes in European forests?

Authors:  Christopher P O Reyer; Stephen Bathgate; Kristina Blennow; Jose G Borges; Harald Bugmann; Sylvain Delzon; Sonia P Faias; Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo; Barry Gardiner; Jose Ramon Gonzalez-Olabarria; Carlos Gracia; Juan Guerra Hernández; Seppo Kellomäki; Koen Kramer; Manfred J Lexer; Marcus Lindner; Ernst van der Maaten; Michael Maroschek; Bart Muys; Bruce Nicoll; Marc Palahi; João Hn Palma; Joana A Paulo; Heli Peltola; Timo Pukkala; Werner Rammer; Duncan Ray; Santiago Sabaté; Mart-Jan Schelhaas; Rupert Seidl; Christian Temperli; Margarida Tomé; Rasoul Yousefpour; Niklaus E Zimmermann; Marc Hanewinkel
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 6.793

6.  Complex Above- and Below-Ground Growth Responses of Two Urban Tree Species Following Root, Stem, and Foliage Damage-An Experimental Approach.

Authors:  Valentina Vitali; Jorge A Ramirez; Guillaume Perrette; Sylvain Delagrange; Alain Paquette; Christian Messier
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Insectivorous birds can see and smell systemically herbivore-induced pines.

Authors:  Elina Mäntylä; Silke Kipper; Monika Hilker
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.