Literature DB >> 21745159

Comparison of two CD40-ligand/interleukin-2 vaccines in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Fatma Visal Okur1, Eric Yvon, Ettore Biagi, Gianpietro Dotti, George Carrum, Helen Heslop, Martha P Mims, Joseph C Fratantoni, Madhusudan V Peshwa, Linhong Li, Malcolm K Brenner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: Several studies have demonstrated that the immunogenicity of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells can be increased by manipulation of the CD40/CD40-ligand (CD40L) pathway. Although immunologic, and perhaps clinical, benefits have been obtained with an autologous CLL tumor vaccine obtained by transgenic expression of CD40L and interleukin (IL)-2, there is little information about the optimal gene transfer strategies.
METHODS: We compared two different CLL vaccines prepared by adenoviral gene transfer and plasmid electroporation, analyzing their phenotype and immunostimulatory activity.
RESULTS: We found that higher expression of transgenic CD40L was mediated by adenoviral gene transfer than by plasmid transduction, and that adenoviral transfer of CD40L was associated with up-regulation of the co-stimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 and adhesion molecule CD54. In contrast, transgenic IL-2 secretion was greater following plasmid transduction. These phenotypic differences in the vaccines were associated with different functionality, both ex vivo and following administration to patients. Thus adenoviral vaccines induced greater activation of leukemia-reactive T cells ex vivo than plasmid vaccines. In treated patients, specific T-cell (T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2)) and humoral anti-leukemia responses were detected following administration of the adenoviral vaccine (n = 15), while recipients of the plasmid vaccine (n = 9) manifested only a low-level Th2 response. Progression-free survival at 2 years was 46.7% in the adenoviral vaccine recipients, versus 11.1 % in those receiving plasmid vaccine.
CONCLUSIONS: CLL vaccines expressing the same transgenes but produced by distinct methods of gene transfer may differ in the polarity of the immune response they induce in patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21745159      PMCID: PMC3687103          DOI: 10.3109/14653249.2011.592523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotherapy        ISSN: 1465-3249            Impact factor:   5.414


  26 in total

1.  Ex vivo generation of human anti-pre-B leukemia-specific autologous cytolytic T cells.

Authors:  A A Cardoso; M J Seamon; H M Afonso; P Ghia; V A Boussiotis; G J Freeman; J G Gribben; S E Sallan; L M Nadler
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  A non-viral gene delivery system designed for clinical use.

Authors:  J C Fratantoni; S Dzekunov; V Singh; L N Liu
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.414

Review 3.  Stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: should not more patients get a transplant?

Authors:  E Jabbour; M J Keating; R E Champlin; I F Khouri
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Adenovirus vector infection of chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells.

Authors:  M J Cantwell; S Sharma; T Friedmann; T J Kipps
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Gene transfer of CD40-ligand induces autologous immune recognition of chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells.

Authors:  K Kato; M J Cantwell; S Sharma; T J Kipps
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  CD40 ligand induces an antileukemia immune response in vivo.

Authors:  D Dilloo; M Brown; M Roskrow; W Zhong; M Holladay; W Holden; M Brenner
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Human dendritic cells activate T lymphocytes via a CD40: CD40 ligand-dependent pathway.

Authors:  A D McLellan; R V Sorg; L A Williams; D N Hart
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: preliminary results.

Authors:  I F Khouri; M J Keating; H M Vriesendorp; C L Reading; D Przepiorka; Y O Huh; B S Andersson; K W van Besien; R C Mehra; S A Giralt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Human CD40-ligand: molecular cloning, cellular distribution and regulation of expression by factors controlling IgE production.

Authors:  J F Gauchat; J P Aubry; G Mazzei; P Life; T Jomotte; G Elson; J Y Bonnefoy
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1993-01-11       Impact factor: 4.124

10.  Activated T cells induce expression of B7/BB1 on normal or leukemic B cells through a CD40-dependent signal.

Authors:  E A Ranheim; T J Kipps
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic cancer vaccines: current status and moving forward.

Authors:  Jeffrey Schlom
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Complementation of antigen-presenting cells to generate T lymphocytes with broad target specificity.

Authors:  Minhtran Charlotte Ngo; Jun Ando; Ann M Leen; Sravya Ennamuri; Natalia Lapteva; Juan F Vera; Amelia Min-Venditti; Martha P Mims; Helen E Heslop; Catherine M Bollard; Stephen Gottschalk; Cliona M Rooney
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 3.  Nanoparticle-Based Manipulation of Antigen-Presenting Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ronnie H Fang; Ashley V Kroll; Liangfang Zhang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 13.281

4.  Multifunctional CD40L: pro- and anti-neoplastic activity.

Authors:  Aleksandra Korniluk; Halina Kemona; Violetta Dymicka-Piekarska
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-08-13

Review 5.  mRNA cancer vaccines: Advances, trends and challenges.

Authors:  Qing He; Hua Gao; Dejiang Tan; Heng Zhang; Jun-Zhi Wang
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 14.903

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.