Literature DB >> 21744968

Sample size planning for longitudinal models: accuracy in parameter estimation for polynomial change parameters.

Ken Kelley1, Joseph R Rausch.   

Abstract

Longitudinal studies are necessary to examine individual change over time, with group status often being an important variable in explaining some individual differences in change. Although sample size planning for longitudinal studies has focused on statistical power, recent calls for effect sizes and their corresponding confidence intervals underscore the importance of obtaining sufficiently accurate estimates of group differences in change. We derived expressions that allow researchers to plan sample size to achieve the desired confidence interval width for group differences in change for orthogonal polynomial change parameters. The approaches developed provide the expected confidence interval width to be sufficiently narrow, with an extension that allows some specified degree of assurance (e.g., 99%) that the confidence interval will be sufficiently narrow. We make computer routines freely available, so that the methods developed can be used by researchers immediately.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21744968     DOI: 10.1037/a0023352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  11 in total

1.  Confidence interval estimation for standardized effect sizes in multilevel and latent growth modeling.

Authors:  Alan Feingold
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2014-09-01

2.  Effect of blood pressure trajectory and variability on new-onset chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Cheng-Chieh Lin; Chia-Ing Li; Chiu-Shong Liu; Chih-Hsueh Lin; Mu-Cyun Wang; Shing-Yu Yang; Tsai-Chung Li
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Power(ful) myths: misconceptions regarding sample size in quality of life research.

Authors:  Samantha F Anderson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.440

4.  Longitudinal design considerations to optimize power to detect variances and covariances among rates of change: simulation results based on actual longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Philippe Rast; Scott M Hofer
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2013-11-11

5.  Memory training for adults with probable mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Graham J McDougall; Ian M McDonough; Michael LaRocca
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.658

6.  Acute-phase blood pressure trajectories and clinical outcomes in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jie Xu; Liye Dai; Zimo Chen; Anxin Wang; Jinglin Mo; Aichun Cheng; Xia Meng; Yilong Wang; Xingquan Zhao; Yongjun Wang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Sample size under inverse negative binomial group testing for accuracy in parameter estimation.

Authors:  Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Abelardo Montesinos-López; José Crossa; Kent Eskridge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  LIFESPAN: A tool for the computer-aided design of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Andreas M Brandmaier; Timo von Oertzen; Paolo Ghisletta; Christopher Hertzog; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-24

9.  Five-year biomarker progression variability for Alzheimer's disease dementia prediction: Can a complex instrumental activities of daily living marker fill in the gaps?

Authors:  Ioannis Tarnanas; Anthoula Tsolaki; Mark Wiederhold; Brenda Wiederhold; Magda Tsolaki
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2015-11-14

10.  Precision, Reliability, and Effect Size of Slope Variance in Latent Growth Curve Models: Implications for Statistical Power Analysis.

Authors:  Andreas M Brandmaier; Timo von Oertzen; Paolo Ghisletta; Ulman Lindenberger; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.