Literature DB >> 21744925

Streaming potential-based arthroscopic device is sensitive to cartilage changes immediately post-impact in an equine cartilage injury model.

A Changoor1, J P Coutu, M Garon, E Quenneville, M B Hurtig, M D Buschmann.   

Abstract

Models of post-traumatic osteoarthritis where early degenerative changes can be monitored are valuable for assessing potential therapeutic strategies. Current methods for evaluating cartilage mechanical properties may not capture the low-grade cartilage changes expected at these earlier time points following injury. In this study, an explant model of cartilage injury was used to determine whether streaming potential measurements by manual indentation could detect cartilage changes immediately following mechanical impact and to compare their sensitivity to biomechanical tests. Impacts were delivered ex vivo, at one of three stress levels, to specific positions on isolated adult equine trochlea. Cartilage properties were assessed by streaming potential measurements, made pre- and post-impact using a commercially available arthroscopic device, and by stress relaxation tests in unconfined compression geometry of isolated cartilage disks, providing the streaming potential integral (SPI), fibril modulus (Ef), matrix modulus (Em), and permeability (k). Histological sections were stained with Safranin-O and adjacent unstained sections examined in polarized light microscopy. Impacts were low, 17.3 ± 2.7 MPa (n = 15), medium, 27.8 ± 8.5 MPa (n = 13), or high, 48.7 ± 12.1 MPa (n = 16), and delivered using a custom-built spring-loaded device with a rise time of approximately 1 ms. SPI was significantly reduced after medium (p = 0.006) and high (p<0.001) impacts. Ef, representing collagen network stiffness, was significantly reduced in high impact samples only (p < 0.001 lateral trochlea, p = 0.042 medial trochlea), where permeability also increased (p = 0.003 lateral trochlea, p = 0.007 medial trochlea). Significant (p < 0.05, n = 68) moderate to strong correlations between SPI and Ef (r = 0.857), Em (r = 0.493), log(k) (r = -0.484), and cartilage thickness (r = -0.804) were detected. Effect sizes were higher for SPI than Ef, Em, and k, indicating greater sensitivity of electromechanical measurements to impact injury compared to purely biomechanical parameters. Histological changes due to impact were limited to the presence of superficial zone damage which increased with impact stress. Non-destructive streaming potential measurements were more sensitive to impact-related articular cartilage changes than biomechanical assessment of isolated samples using stress relaxation tests in unconfined compression geometry. Correlations between electromechanical and biomechanical methods further support the relationship between non-destructive electromechanical measurements and intrinsic cartilage properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21744925     DOI: 10.1115/1.4004230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  12 in total

1.  Matrix fixed charge density modulates exudate concentration during cartilage compression.

Authors:  Lok Shun Ko; Thomas M Quinn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Nondestructive Assessment of Articular Cartilage Electromechanical Properties after Osteochondral Autologous and Allogeneic Transplantation in a Goat Model.

Authors:  Tomas Mickevicius; Alius Pockevicius; Audrius Kucinskas; Rimtautas Gudas; Justinas Maciulaitis; Arvydas Usas
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Identification of cartilage injury using quantitative multiphoton microscopy.

Authors:  K D Novakofski; R M Williams; L A Fortier; H O Mohammed; W R Zipfel; L J Bonassar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Osteochondral Repair and Electromechanical Evaluation of Custom 3D Scaffold Microstructured by Direct Laser Writing Lithography.

Authors:  Justinas Maciulaitis; Milda Miskiniene; Sima Rekštytė; Maksim Bratchikov; Adas Darinskas; Agne Simbelyte; Gintaras Daunoras; Aida Laurinaviciene; Arvydas Laurinavicius; Rimtautas Gudas; Mangirdas Malinauskas; Romaldas Maciulaitis
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Non-invasive Electroarthrography Measures Load-Induced Cartilage Streaming Potentials via Electrodes Placed on Skin Surrounding an Articular Joint.

Authors:  Adele Changoor; Martin Garon; Eric Quenneville; Shelley B Bull; Karen Gordon; Pierre Savard; Michael D Buschmann; Mark B Hurtig
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Biomechanical Changes of Repair Tissue after Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation at Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Teemu Paatela; Anna Vasara; Heikki Nurmi; Hannu Kautiainen; Jukka S Jurvelin; Ilkka Kiviranta
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Pre-Osteoarthritis: Definition and Diagnosis of an Elusive Clinical Entity.

Authors:  Leif Ryd; Mats Brittberg; Karl Eriksson; Jukka S Jurvelin; Anders Lindahl; Stefan Marlovits; Per Möller; James B Richardson; Matthias Steinwachs; Marcy Zenobi-Wong
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Characterization of Tissue Response to Impact Loads Delivered Using a Hand-Held Instrument for Studying Articular Cartilage Injury.

Authors:  Edward D Bonnevie; Michelle L Delco; Lisa A Fortier; Peter G Alexander; Rocky S Tuan; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Electromechanical Assessment of Human Knee Articular Cartilage with Compression-Induced Streaming Potentials.

Authors:  Christoph Becher; Marcel Ricklefs; Elmar Willbold; Christof Hurschler; Reza Abedian
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Impact of storage conditions on electromechanical, histological and histochemical properties of osteochondral allografts.

Authors:  Tomas Mickevicius; Alius Pockevicius; Audrius Kucinskas; Rimtautas Gudas; Justinas Maciulaitis; Aurelija Noreikaite; Arvydas Usas
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.