Literature DB >> 21744178

[Consequences of the German federal Guardianship Law after reunification (1992-2009)].

J Valdes-Stauber1, H Deinert, R Kilian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Guardianship Law became effective in the year 1992 with the intention of replacing the paternalistic-restrictive model by a model based on the principles of participation and empowerment.
METHODS: Data from the Federal Ministry of Justice were used to examine the development of 12 legal guardianship parameters over a period of 17 years (1992-2009) at the level of federal states. Due to the completely different practise in both parts of Germany before reunification, the development will be analysed separately for the old and the new federal states.
RESULTS: All examined parameters indicate an increase of legal guardianship. The highest increases were found for enlargement of the task scope (+606%) and for approval of contention measures (+868%). With the exception of involuntary commitment rates, in the new federal states the mean values of all variables score higher than in the old federal states. Legal guardianship installation only increased for the old federal states significantly (T(9)=6.64; p=0.007); however, the guardianship expenses were higher, but not significantly, for the new federal states. DISCUSSION: In spite of the legal changes in the direction of a dynamic instrument in mental health care, the practise of the Legal Guardianship Law indicates a continuous increase of guardianship orders since 1992. It is necessary to recognise that a slowdown of the upward trend is not in sight. Therefore it is pertinent to call those persons in charge of regulating legal guardianship to consider their daily practise carefully. On the other hand it is a task of mental health services research to analyse the driving factors of the presented developments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21744178     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-011-3327-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  10 in total

1.  Perspectives on legislation relating to the rights and protection of people with dementia in Europe.

Authors:  D Gove; J Georges
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.658

2.  [Involuntary hospitalisations in accordance with guardianship law during eight years tripled].

Authors:  Peter Müller; Tatjana Josipovic
Journal:  Psychiatr Prax       Date:  2003-04

3.  [Involuntary hospital admissions of mentally ill patients--how specific are differences among the German Federal States?].

Authors:  Hans Joachim Salize; Andreas Spengler; Harald Dressing
Journal:  Psychiatr Prax       Date:  2007-04

4.  Guardianship for the severely mentally ill.

Authors:  Y Melamed; R Kimchi; Y Barak
Journal:  Med Law       Date:  2000

5.  [The development of legal guardianship and involuntary treatment in a Bavarian catchment area in comparison to trends at the federal state and the federal level between 1999 and 2009].

Authors:  Juan Valdes-Stauber; Albert Putzhammer; Reinhold Kilian
Journal:  Psychiatr Prax       Date:  2011-05-05

6.  Recent changes in the prevalence of psychiatric disorders among VA nursing home residents.

Authors:  Sonne P Lemke; Jeanne A Schaefer
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Medical decision-making during the guardianship process for incapacitated, hospitalized adults: a descriptive cohort study.

Authors:  Robin J Bandy; Paul R Helft; Robert W Bandy; Alexia M Torke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Guardianship of people with mental disorders.

Authors:  Yuval Melamed; Israel Doron; Dan Shnitt
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Guardianship determinations by judges, attorneys, and guardians.

Authors:  Melanie Gavisk; Edith Greene
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2007

Review 10.  Coercion in psychiatry.

Authors:  Thomas Wilhelm Kallert
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.741

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  [People with mental disorders in East and West Germany: indicators of institutionalized care since reunification].

Authors:  J Mir; S Priebe; A P Mundt
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  The use of coercive interventions in mental health care in Germany and the Netherlands. A comparison of the developments in two neighboring countries.

Authors:  Tilman Steinert; Eric O Noorthoorn; Cornelis L Mulder
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-09-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.