Literature DB >> 21744030

Mismatch of desired versus perceived social support and associated levels of anxiety and depression in newly diagnosed cancer patients.

Wolfgang Linden1, Andrea Vodermaier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Perceived social support serves as a buffer against stress in cancer patients as well as in the healthy. However, not all individuals low in support necessarily want more support. We, therefore, tested a match-mismatch model (low versus high perceived support relative to low versus high desired support) with regard to its association with emotional distress.
METHODS: Participants included two large samples of n = 576 consecutively recruited, newly diagnosed cancer patients and n = 383 healthy controls. The hypothesized interaction effects of perceived and desired support and its impact on anxiety and depressive symptoms were tested via hierarchical linear regression.
RESULTS: Perceived social support and desire for support were orthogonal in cancer patients (r = -0.03, p = 0.56). In accordance with the match-mismatch model, only those cancer patients with a high desire for support but who perceived low support exceeded cut-offs suggestive of anxiety and/or depressive disorder, whereas the other patient groups did not show clinical symptoms. Results for healthy controls were weaker.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the hypothesized match-mismatch model suggesting that lack of social support is only associated with emotional distress when patients desire more support than they actually perceive as having. Perceived as well as desired social support are, therefore, relevant and non-overlapping constructs to be included in screening tools for emotional distress in order to heighten the utility of screening as a decision aid to guide psycho-oncological follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21744030     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1228-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  22 in total

1.  Psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer over 4 years: identifying distinct trajectories of change.

Authors:  Vicki S Helgeson; Pamela Snyder; Howard Seltman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Screening for psychological distress in cancer patients: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Social support and adjustment to cancer: reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research.

Authors:  V S Helgeson; S Cohen
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group.

Authors:  R Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; A Boyes; B Bonevski; L Burton; P Cook
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Authors:  S Cohen; T A Wills
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Satisfaction with support given and its association with subsequent health status.

Authors:  Glenn V Ostir; Eleanor Simonsick; Judith D Kasper; Jack M Guralnik
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2002-08

Review 7.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.

Authors:  R F Baumeister; M R Leary
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Social relationships and health.

Authors:  J S House; K R Landis; D Umberson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Social support and depression among bone marrow transplant patients.

Authors:  Julie D Jenks Kettmann; Elizabeth M Altmaier
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2008-01

10.  The psychosocial screen for cancer (PSSCAN): further validation and normative data.

Authors:  Wolfgang Linden; A Andrea Vodermaier; Regina McKenzie; Maria C Barroetavena; Dahyun Yi; Richard Doll
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  8 in total

1.  Social support buffers against anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with cancer only if support is wanted: a large sample replication.

Authors:  Andrea Vodermaier; Wolfgang Linden
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Social support needs: discordance between home hospice nurses and former family caregivers.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Kristin G Cloyes; Joan Carpenter; Patricia H Berry; Margaret F Clayton; Lee Ellington
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2014-02-17

3.  Depression and family interaction among low-income, predominantly hispanic cancer patients: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Hyunsung Oh; Kathleen Ell; Andrew Subica
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Support for Young Adult Cancer Patients: Perspectives of Patients and their Mothers.

Authors:  Nathanael B Stanley; Gwendolyn Quinn; Damon Reed; Andrew Galligan; Maija Reblin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Oxytocin Genotype Moderates the Impact of Social Support on Psychiatric Distress in Alcohol-Dependent Patients.

Authors:  Tiffany M Love; James A Cranford; Margit Burmeister; Marcin Wojnar; Robert A Zucker; Kirk J Brower
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.826

6.  The Association of Sources of Support, Types of Support and Satisfaction with Support Received on Perceived Stress and Quality of Life of Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Iván Ruiz-Rodríguez; Isabel Hombrados-Mendieta; Anabel Melguizo-Garín; Mª José Martos-Méndez
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.279

7.  Associations among eHealth literacy, social support, individual resilience, and emotional status in primary care providers during the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant.

Authors:  Richard Huan Xu; Lu-Shao-Bo Shi; Yi Xia; Dong Wang
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-03-25

8.  Not urbanization level but socioeconomic, physical and social neighbourhood characteristics are associated with presence and severity of depressive and anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Ellen Generaal; Erik J Timmermans; Jasper E C Dekkers; Johannes H Smit; Brenda W J H Penninx
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 7.723

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.