Literature DB >> 21742564

Simultaneous determination of thiamphenicol, florfenicol and florfenicol amine in eggs by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection.

Kaizhou Xie1, Longfei Jia, Yilin Yao, Dong Xu, Shuqing Chen, Xing Xie, Yan Pei, Wenbin Bao, Guojun Dai, Jinyu Wang, Zongping Liu.   

Abstract

A specific, sensitive and widely applicable reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (RP-HPLC-FLD) method was developed for the simultaneous determination of thiamphenicol (TAP), florfenicol (FF) and florfenicol amine (FFA) in eggs. Samples were extracted with ethyl acetate-acetonitrile-ammonium hydroxide (49:49:2, v/v), defatted with hexane, followed by RP-HPLC-FLD determination. Liquid chromatography was performed on a 5 μm LiChrospher C(18) column using a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile (A), 0.01 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate containing 0.005 M sodium dodecyl sulfate and 0.1% triethylamine, adjusted to pH 4.8 by 85% phosphoric acid (B) (A:B, 35:65 v/v), at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The fluorescence detector of HPLC was set at 224 nm for excitation wavelength and 290 nm for emission wavelength. Limits of detection (LODs) were 1.5 μg/kg for TAP and FF, 0.5 μg/kg for FFA in eggs; limits of quantitation (LOQs) were 5 μg/kg for TAP and FF, 2 μg/kg for FFA in eggs. Linear calibration curves were obtained over concentration ranges of 0.025-5.0 μg/mL for TAP with determination coefficients of 0.9997, 0.01-10.0 μg/mL for FF with determination coefficients of 0.9997 and 0.0025-2.50 μg/mL for FFA with determination coefficients of 0.9998, respectively. The recovery values ranged from 86.4% to 93.8% for TAP, 87.4% to 92.3% for FF and from 89.0% to 95.2% for FFA. The corresponding intra-day and inter-day variation (relative standard deviation, R.S.D.) found to be less than 6.7% and 10.8%, respectively.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21742564     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  4 in total

Review 1.  Past and Present of Electrochemical Sensors and Methods for Amphenicol Antibiotic Analysis.

Authors:  Iulia Gabriela David; Mihaela Buleandra; Dana Elena Popa; Mihaela Carmen Cheregi; Emilia Elena Iorgulescu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.523

2.  Florfenicol Binding to Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Nanoparticles in Model and Real Samples.

Authors:  Nelson Caro; Tamara Bruna; Antonio Guerreiro; Paola Alvarez-Tejos; Virginia Garretón; Sergey Piletsky; Jorge González-Casanova; Diana Rojas-Gómez; Nicole Ehrenfeld
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 5.076

3.  Combined Effects of Temperature and Salinity on the Pharmacokinetics of Florfenicol in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Reared in Brackish Water.

Authors:  Tirawat Rairat; Yi-Kai Liu; Julia Chu-Nin Hsu; Chia-Yu Hsieh; Niti Chuchird; Chi-Chung Chou
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-01

4.  Residue Depletion of Florfenicol and Florfenicol Amine in Broiler Chicken Claws and a Comparison of Their Concentrations in Edible Tissues Using LC⁻MS/MS.

Authors:  Ekaterina Pokrant; Ricardo Riquelme; Aldo Maddaleno; Betty San Martín; Javiera Cornejo
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.