Literature DB >> 21742044

Evaluating phylogenetic informativeness and data-type usage for new protein-coding genes across Vertebrata.

Jonathan J Fong1, Matthew K Fujita.   

Abstract

As a resource for vertebrate phylogenetics, we developed 75 new protein-coding genes using a combination of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) available in Genbank, and targeted amplification of complementary DNA (cDNA). In addition, we performed three additional analyses in order to assess the utility of our approach. First, we profiled the phylogenetic informativeness of these new markers using the online program PhyDesign. Next, we compared the utility of four different data-types used in phylogenetics: nucleotides (NUCL), amino acids (AA), 1st and 2nd codon positions only (N12), and modified sequences to account for codon degeneracy (DEGEN1; Regier et al., 2010). Lastly, we use these new markers to construct a vertebrate phylogeny and address the uncertain relationship between higher-level mammal groups: monotremes, marsupials, and placentals. Our results show that phylogenetic informativeness of the 75 new markers varies, both in the amount of phylogenetic signal and optimal timescale. When comparing the four data-types, we find that the NUCL data-type, due to the high level of phylogenetic signal, performs the best across all divergence times. The remaining three data-types (AA, N12, DEGEN1) are less subject to homoplasy, but have greatly reduced levels of phylogenetic signal relative to NUCL. Our phylogenetic inference supports the Theria hypothesis of mammalian relationships, with marsupials and placentals being sister groups.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21742044     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  8 in total

1.  The development of three long universal nuclear protein-coding locus markers and their application to osteichthyan phylogenetics with nested PCR.

Authors:  Xing-Xing Shen; Dan Liang; Peng Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A phylogenomic approach to vertebrate phylogeny supports a turtle-archosaur affinity and a possible paraphyletic lissamphibia.

Authors:  Jonathan J Fong; Jeremy M Brown; Matthew K Fujita; Bastien Boussau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Phylogenomic resolution of paleozoic divergences in harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones) via analysis of next-generation transcriptome data.

Authors:  Marshal Hedin; James Starrett; Sajia Akhter; Axel L Schönhofer; Jeffrey W Shultz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A consistent phylogenetic backbone for the fungi.

Authors:  Ingo Ebersberger; Ricardo de Matos Simoes; Anne Kupczok; Matthias Gube; Erika Kothe; Kerstin Voigt; Arndt von Haeseler
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Coalescent-based genome analyses resolve the early branches of the euarchontoglires.

Authors:  Vikas Kumar; Björn M Hallström; Axel Janke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A multilocus phylogeny of the world Sycoecinae fig wasps (Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae).

Authors:  Astrid Cruaud; Jenny G Underhill; Maïlis Huguin; Gwenaëlle Genson; Roula Jabbour-Zahab; Krystal A Tolley; Jean-Yves Rasplus; Simon van Noort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of gene molecular evolution on phylogenetic reconstruction: a case study in the rosids (Superorder Rosanae, Angiosperms).

Authors:  Khidir W Hilu; Chelsea M Black; Dipan Oza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The first set of universal nuclear protein-coding loci markers for avian phylogenetic and population genetic studies.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Simin Liu; Chia-Fen Yeh; Nan Zhang; Guoling Chen; Pinjia Que; Lu Dong; Shou-Hsien Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.