Literature DB >> 21742042

Motor and attentional mechanisms involved in social interaction--evidence from mu and alpha EEG suppression.

Anat Perry1, Libi Stein, Shlomo Bentin.   

Abstract

Mu rhythms are EEG oscillations in the 8-13 Hz recorded at sites located roughly over the sensory-motor cortex. There is reliable evidence that the amplitude of mu rhythms is reduced when the participant performs a motor act (mu suppression). Recent studies found mu suppression not only in response to actual movements but also while the participant observes actions executed by someone else. This finding putatively associates the mu suppression to the activity of a mirror neurons system which, in humans, has been suggested to contribute to social skills. In the present study we explored the effects of different levels of social interaction on mu suppression. Participants observed dynamic displays of hand gestures performing actions used in the Rock-Scissors-Paper game. In different blocks, participants passively viewed identical video clips with no game context and in the context of a game, or while being actually engaged in the game either by imagining actions or by actual playing. As a baseline for calculating mu suppression we used a dynamic display of a rolling ball. In addition, to isolate the social aspect of the actual movements, participants performed the same acts outside the game context. Mu suppression was larger while participants were engaged in the social game than when they passively looked at the "opponent" actions or when they performed movements without the game context. This effect was found while viewing the opponent play as well as while actually playing, which supports the view that mu suppression is affected not only by motion, but also by the social context of the motion. However, we did not find differences in mu suppression between perception segments in which the participant did not actually play. Furthermore, in all perception segments occipital alpha suppression was more robust than mu suppression suggesting the involvement of a strong attentional component. While actually playing, however, mu suppression was stronger than alpha suppression.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21742042     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  35 in total

1.  Somatosensory experiences with action modulate alpha and beta power during subsequent action observation.

Authors:  Lorna C Quandt; Peter J Marshall; Cedric A Bouquet; Thomas F Shipley
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  The role of empathy in the neural responses to observed human social touch.

Authors:  Leehe Peled-Avron; Einat Levy-Gigi; Gal Richter-Levin; Nachshon Korem; Simone G Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Are you looking at me? Mu suppression modulation by facial expression direction.

Authors:  Noga S Ensenberg; Anat Perry; Hillel Aviezer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Power modulation of electroencephalogram mu and beta frequency depends on perceived level of observed actions.

Authors:  Shiri Simon; Roy Mukamel
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Interbrain phase synchronization during turn-taking verbal interaction-a hyperscanning study using simultaneous EEG/MEG.

Authors:  Sangtae Ahn; Hohyun Cho; Moonyoung Kwon; Kiwoong Kim; Hyukchan Kwon; Bong Soo Kim; Won Seok Chang; Jin Woo Chang; Sung Chan Jun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Automatic attribution of social coordination information to chasing scenes: evidence from mu suppression.

Authors:  Jipeng Duan; Zhangxiang Yang; Xiaoyan He; Meixuan Shao; Jun Yin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Distinct visuo-motor brain dynamics for real-world objects versus planar images.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Katherine A Breeding; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Enhanced mirroring upon mutual gaze: multimodal evidence from TMS-assessed corticospinal excitability and the EEG mu rhythm.

Authors:  Jellina Prinsen; Kaat Alaerts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  EEG-controlled functional electrical stimulation rehabilitation for chronic stroke: system design and clinical application.

Authors:  Long Chen; Bin Gu; Zhongpeng Wang; Lei Zhang; Minpeng Xu; Shuang Liu; Feng He; Dong Ming
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Sensitivity of alpha and beta oscillations to sensorimotor characteristics of action: an EEG study of action production and gesture observation.

Authors:  Lorna C Quandt; Peter J Marshall; Thomas F Shipley; Sian L Beilock; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.