Literature DB >> 21741981

Epistasis analysis between homologous recombination genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies multiple repair pathways for Sgs1, Mus81-Mms4 and RNase H2.

Miki Ii1, Tatsuya Ii, Larisa I Mironova, Steven J Brill.   

Abstract

The DNA repair genes SGS1 and MUS81 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are thought to control alternative pathways for the repair of toxic recombination intermediates based on the fact that sgs1Δ mus81Δ synthetic lethality is suppressed in the absence of homologous recombination (HR). Although these genes appear to functionally overlap in yeast and other model systems, the specific pathways controlled by SGS1 and MUS81 are poorly defined. Epistasis analyses based on DNA damage sensitivity previously indicated that SGS1 functioned primarily downstream of RAD51, and that MUS81 was independent of RAD51. To further define these genetic pathways, we carried out a systematic epistasis analysis between the RAD52-epistasis group genes and SGS1, MUS81, and RNH202, which encodes a subunit of RNase H2. Based on synthetic-fitness interactions and DNA damage sensitivities, we find that RAD52 is epistatic to MUS81 but not SGS1. In contrast, RAD54, RAD55 and RAD57 are epistatic to SGS1, MUS81 and RNH202. As expected, SHU2 is epistatic to SGS1, while both SHU1 and SHU2 are epistatic to MUS81. Importantly, loss of any RNase H2 subunit on its own resulted in increased recombination using a simple marker-excision assay. RNase H2 is thus needed to maintain genome stability consistent with the sgs1Δ rnh202Δ synthetic fitness defect. We conclude that SGS1 and MUS81 act in parallel pathways downstream of RAD51 and RAD52, respectively. The data further indicate these pathways share common components and display complex interactions. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21741981      PMCID: PMC3162113          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  68 in total

1.  RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion.

Authors:  Anna Malkova; Maria L Naylor; Miyuki Yamaguchi; Grzegorz Ira; James E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  ATP-dependent and ATP-independent roles for the Rad54 chromatin remodeling enzyme during recombinational repair of a DNA double strand break.

Authors:  Branden Wolner; Craig L Peterson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  BLAP75/RMI1 promotes the BLM-dependent dissolution of homologous recombination intermediates.

Authors:  Leonard Wu; Csanad Z Bachrati; Jiongwen Ou; Chang Xu; Jinhu Yin; Michael Chang; Weidong Wang; Lei Li; Grant W Brown; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The ability of Sgs1 to interact with DNA topoisomerase III is essential for damage-induced recombination.

Authors:  Ayako Ui; Masayuki Seki; Hideaki Ogiwara; Ryoko Onodera; Shin-ichi Fukushige; Fumitoshi Onoda; Takemi Enomoto
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2005-02-03

5.  A genetic screen for top3 suppressors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies SHU1, SHU2, PSY3 and CSM2: four genes involved in error-free DNA repair.

Authors:  Erika Shor; Justin Weinstein; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  RMI1/NCE4, a suppressor of genome instability, encodes a member of the RecQ helicase/Topo III complex.

Authors:  Michael Chang; Mohammed Bellaoui; Chaoying Zhang; Ridhdhi Desai; Pavel Morozov; Lissette Delgado-Cruzata; Rodney Rothstein; Greg A Freyer; Charles Boone; Grant W Brown
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Roles of SGS1, MUS81, and RAD51 in the repair of lagging-strand replication defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Miki Ii; Steven J Brill
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 8.  Recombination proteins in yeast.

Authors:  Berit Olsen Krogh; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  Yeast Rmi1/Nce4 controls genome stability as a subunit of the Sgs1-Top3 complex.

Authors:  Janet R Mullen; Ferez S Nallaseth; Yan Q Lan; Christopher E Slagle; Steven J Brill
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase.

Authors:  Giordano Liberi; Giulio Maffioletti; Chiara Lucca; Irene Chiolo; Anastasia Baryshnikova; Cecilia Cotta-Ramusino; Massimo Lopes; Achille Pellicioli; James E Haber; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  12 in total

1.  Stimulation of Chromosomal Rearrangements by Ribonucleotides.

Authors:  Hailey N Conover; Scott A Lujan; Mary J Chapman; Deborah A Cornelio; Rabab Sharif; Jessica S Williams; Alan B Clark; Francheska Camilo; Thomas A Kunkel; Juan Lucas Argueso
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Arabidopsis thaliana RNase H2 deficiency counteracts the needs for the WEE1 checkpoint kinase but triggers genome instability.

Authors:  Pooneh Kalhorzadeh; Zhubing Hu; Toon Cools; Simon Amiard; Eva-Maria Willing; Nancy De Winne; Kris Gevaert; Geert De Jaeger; Korbinian Schneeberger; Charles I White; Lieven De Veylder
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  A saccharomyces cerevisiae RNase H2 interaction network functions to suppress genome instability.

Authors:  Stephanie Allen-Soltero; Sandra L Martinez; Christopher D Putnam; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Genome instability consequences of RNase H2 Aicardi-Goutières syndrome alleles.

Authors:  Catherine J Potenski; Anastasiya Epshtein; Christopher Bianco; Hannah L Klein
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-04-04

Review 5.  Genome instabilities arising from ribonucleotides in DNA.

Authors:  Hannah L Klein
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

6.  Genome-wide mutagenesis resulting from topoisomerase 1-processing of unrepaired ribonucleotides in DNA.

Authors:  Jessica S Williams; Scott A Lujan; Zhi-Xiong Zhou; Adam B Burkholder; Alan B Clark; David C Fargo; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-03

Review 7.  The Top1 paradox: Friend and foe of the eukaryotic genome.

Authors:  Nayun Kim; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 8.  Processing ribonucleotides incorporated during eukaryotic DNA replication.

Authors:  Jessica S Williams; Scott A Lujan; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  Elevated Genome-Wide Instability in Yeast Mutants Lacking RNase H Activity.

Authors:  Karen O'Connell; Sue Jinks-Robertson; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  High density of unrepaired genomic ribonucleotides leads to Topoisomerase 1-mediated severe growth defects in absence of ribonucleotide reductase.

Authors:  Susana M Cerritelli; Jaime Iranzo; Sushma Sharma; Andrei Chabes; Robert J Crouch; David Tollervey; Aziz El Hage
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.