Literature DB >> 21740994

Microbeam radiation-induced tissue damage depends on the stage of vascular maturation.

Sara Sabatasso1, Jean Albert Laissue, Ruslan Hlushchuk, Werner Graber, Alberto Bravin, Elke Bräuer-Krisch, Stéphanie Corde, Hans Blattmann, Guenther Gruber, Valentin Djonov.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the effects of microbeam radiation (MR) on vascular biology, we used the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model of an almost pure vascular system with immature vessels (lacking periendothelial coverage) at Day 8 and mature vessels (with coverage) at Day 12 of development. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CAMs were irradiated with microplanar beams (width, ∼25 μm; interbeam spacing, ∼200 μm) at entrance doses of 200 or 300 Gy and, for comparison, with a broad beam (seamless radiation [SLR]), with entrance doses of 5 to 40 Gy.
RESULTS: In vivo monitoring of Day-8 CAM vasculature 6 h after 200 Gy MR revealed a near total destruction of the immature capillary plexus. Conversely, 200 Gy MR barely affected Day-12 CAM mature microvasculature. Morphological evaluation of Day-12 CAMs after the dose was increased to 300 Gy revealed opened interendothelial junctions, which could explain the transient mesenchymal edema immediately after irradiation. Electron micrographs revealed cytoplasmic vacuolization of endothelial cells in the beam path, with disrupted luminal surfaces; often the lumen was engorged with erythrocytes and leukocytes. After 30 min, the capillary plexus adopted a striated metronomic pattern, with alternating destroyed and intact zones, corresponding to the beam and the interbeam paths within the array. SLR at a dose of 10 Gy caused growth retardation, resulting in a remarkable reduction in the vascular endpoint density 24 h postirradiation. A dose of 40 Gy damaged the entire CAM vasculature.
CONCLUSIONS: The effects of MR are mediated by capillary damage, with tissue injury caused by insufficient blood supply. Vascular toxicity and physiological effects of MR depend on the stage of capillary maturation and appear in the first 15 to 60 min after irradiation. Conversely, the effects of SLR, due to the arrest of cell proliferation, persist for a longer time.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21740994     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  18 in total

Review 1.  Microirradiation techniques in radiobiological research.

Authors:  Guido A Drexler; Miguel J Ruiz-Gómez
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Microbeam radiation therapy alters vascular architecture and tumor oxygenation and is enhanced by a galectin-1 targeted anti-angiogenic peptide.

Authors:  Robert J Griffin; Nathan A Koonce; Ruud P M Dings; Eric Siegel; Eduardo G Moros; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Peter M Corry
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  The chicken chorioallantoic membrane model in biology, medicine and bioengineering.

Authors:  Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska; Tatiana Segura; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 9.596

4.  Effects of high-dose microbeam irradiation on tumor microvascular function and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Andrew N Fontanella; Mary-Keara Boss; Michael Hadsell; Jian Zhang; Thies Schroeder; Katherine G Berman; Mark W Dewhirst; Sha Chang; Gregory M Palmer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Treating Brain Tumor with Microbeam Radiation Generated by a Compact Carbon-Nanotube-Based Irradiator: Initial Radiation Efficacy Study.

Authors:  Hong Yuan; Lei Zhang; Jonathan E Frank; Christina R Inscoe; Laurel M Burk; Mike Hadsell; Yueh Z Lee; Jianping Lu; Sha Chang; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  A proof of principle experiment for microbeam radiation therapy at the Munich compact light source.

Authors:  Annique C Dombrowsky; Karin Burger; Ann-Kristin Porth; Marlon Stein; Martin Dierolf; Benedikt Günther; Klaus Achterhold; Bernhard Gleich; Annette Feuchtinger; Stefan Bartzsch; Elke Beyreuther; Stephanie E Combs; Franz Pfeiffer; Jan J Wilkens; Thomas E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Transient and Efficient Vascular Permeability Window for Adjuvant Drug Delivery Triggered by Microbeam Radiation.

Authors:  Sarah Sabatasso; Cristian Fernandez-Palomo; Ruslan Hlushchuk; Jennifer Fazzari; Stefan Tschanz; Paolo Pellicioli; Michael Krisch; Jean A Laissue; Valentin Djonov
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  CT perfusion imaging as an early biomarker of differential response to stereotactic radiosurgery in C6 rat gliomas.

Authors:  Timothy Pok Chi Yeung; Maher Kurdi; Yong Wang; Baraa Al-Khazraji; Laura Morrison; Lisa Hoffman; Dwayne Jackson; Cathie Crukley; Ting-Yim Lee; Glenn Bauman; Slav Yartsev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Endothelial perturbations and therapeutic strategies in normal tissue radiation damage.

Authors:  Elina Korpela; Stanley K Liu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  In vivo optical imaging of tumor and microvascular response to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Azusa Maeda; Michael K K Leung; Leigh Conroy; Yonghong Chen; Jiachuan Bu; Patricia E Lindsay; Shani Mintzberg; Carl Virtanen; Julissa Tsao; Neil A Winegarden; Yanchun Wang; Lily Morikawa; I Alex Vitkin; David A Jaffray; Richard P Hill; Ralph S DaCosta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.