Literature DB >> 21740962

The protein interaction network mediated by human SH3 domains.

Martina Carducci1, Livia Perfetto, Leonardo Briganti, Serena Paoluzi, Stefano Costa, Johannes Zerweck, Mike Schutkowski, Luisa Castagnoli, Gianni Cesareni.   

Abstract

Families of conserved protein domains, specialized in mediating interactions with short linear peptide motifs, are responsible for the formation of a variety of dynamic complexes in the cell. An important subclass of these motifs are characterized by a high proline content and play a pivotal role in biological processes requiring the coordinated assembly of multi-protein complexes. This is achieved via interaction of proteins containing modules such as Src Homology-3 (SH3) or WW domains and specific proline rich patterns. Here we make available via a publicly accessible database a synopsis of our current understanding of the interaction landscape of the human SH3 protein family. This is achieved by integrating an information extraction strategy with a new experimental approach. In a first approach we have used a text mining strategy to capture a large number of manuscripts reporting interactions between SH3 domains and target peptides. Relevant information was annotated in the MINT database. In a second experimental approach we have used a variant of the WISE (Whole Interactome Scanning Experiment) strategy to probe a large number of naturally occurring and chemically-synthesized peptides arrayed at high density on a glass surface. By this method we have tested 60 human SH3 domains for their ability to bind a collection of 9192 poly-proline containing peptides immobilized on a glass chip. To evaluate the quality of the resulting interaction dataset, we retested some of the interactions on a smaller scale and performed a series of pull down experiments on native proteins. Peptide chips, pull down assays, SPOT synthesis and phage display experiments have allowed us to further characterize the specificity and promiscuity of proline-rich binding domains and to map their interaction network. Both the information captured from the literature and the interactions inferred from the peptide chip experiments were collected and stored in the PepspotDB (http://mint.bio.uniroma2.it/PepspotDB/).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21740962     DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Adv        ISSN: 0734-9750            Impact factor:   14.227


  18 in total

1.  Charting the landscape of tandem BRCT domain-mediated protein interactions.

Authors:  Nicholas T Woods; Rafael D Mesquita; Michael Sweet; Marcelo A Carvalho; Xueli Li; Yun Liu; Huey Nguyen; C Eric Thomas; Edwin S Iversen; Sylvia Marsillac; Rachel Karchin; John Koomen; Alvaro N A Monteiro
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 8.192

2.  The development and application of a quantitative peptide microarray based approach to protein interaction domain specificity space.

Authors:  Brett W Engelmann; Yohan Kim; Miaoyan Wang; Bjoern Peters; Ronald S Rock; Piers D Nash
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Machine-learning techniques for the prediction of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Debasree Sarkar; Sudipto Saha
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 4.  High-throughput analysis of peptide-binding modules.

Authors:  Bernard A Liu; Brett W Engelmann; Piers D Nash
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 5.  The application of modular protein domains in proteomics.

Authors:  Joshua A Jadwin; Mari Ogiue-Ikeda; Kazuya Machida
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Large-Scale Screening of Preferred Interactions of Human Src Homology-3 (SH3) Domains Using Native Target Proteins as Affinity Ligands.

Authors:  Arunas Kazlauskas; Constanze Schmotz; Tapio Kesti; Jussi Hepojoki; Iivari Kleino; Tomonori Kaneko; Shawn S C Li; Kalle Saksela
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Expression and purification of the membrane enzyme selenoprotein K.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Prabhavathi Srinivasan; Diane N Pham; Sharon Rozovsky
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 1.650

8.  Molecular characterization, tissue distribution, and functional analysis of the STAC3 gene in chicken.

Authors:  Huadong Yin; Jing Zhao; Shunshun Han; Can Cui; Yan Wang; Diyan Li; Qing Zhu
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  New analysis pipeline for high-throughput domain-peptide affinity experiments improves SH2 interaction data.

Authors:  Tom Ronan; Roman Garnett; Kristen M Naegle
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Both Intrinsic Substrate Preference and Network Context Contribute to Substrate Selection of Classical Tyrosine Phosphatases.

Authors:  Anita Palma; Michele Tinti; Serena Paoluzi; Elena Santonico; Bernd Willem Brandt; Rob Hooft van Huijsduijnen; Antonia Masch; Jaap Heringa; Mike Schutkowski; Luisa Castagnoli; Gianni Cesareni
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.