Literature DB >> 21740334

Quality assurance of laboratory work and clinical use of laboratory tests in general practice in norway: a survey.

Geir Thue1, Marianne Jevnaker, Guri Andersen Gulstad, Sverre Sandberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Virtually all the general practices in Norway participate in the Norwegian Quality Improvement of Laboratory Services in Primary Care, NOKLUS. In order to assess and develop NOKLUS's services, it was decided to carry out an investigation in the largest participating group, general practices.
DESIGN: In autumn 2008 a questionnaire was sent to all Norwegian general practices asking for feedback on different aspects of NOKLUS's main services: contact with medical laboratory technologists, sending of control materials, use and maintenance of practice-specific laboratory binders, courses, and testing of laboratory equipment. In addition, attitudes were elicited towards possible new services directed at assessing other technical equipment and clinical use of tests.
RESULTS: Responses were received from 1290 of 1552 practices (83%). The great majority thought that the frequency of sending out control material should continue as at present, and they were pleased with the feedback reports and follow-up by the laboratory technologists in the counties. Even after many years of practical experience, there is still a need to update laboratory knowledge through visits to practices, courses, and written information. Practices also wanted quality assurance of blood pressure meters and spirometers, and many doctors wanted feedback on their use of laboratory tests.
CONCLUSION: Services regarding quality assurance of point-of-care tests, guidance, and courses should be continued. Quality assurance of other technical equipment and of the doctor's clinical use of laboratory tests should be established as part of comprehensive quality assurance.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21740334      PMCID: PMC3347963          DOI: 10.3109/02813432.2011.585837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  9 in total

Review 1.  Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients.

Authors:  E McColl; A Jacoby; L Thomas; J Soutter; C Bamford; N Steen; R Thomas; E Harvey; A Garratt; J Bond
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  External quality assessment of general practice laboratories: organizational issues and interpretation of feedback reports.

Authors:  G Thue; A Klovning; S Sandberg
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.713

Review 3.  The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  R Crow; H Gage; S Hampson; J Hart; A Kimber; L Storey; H Thomas
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  [Guidelines in general practice--are they read and are they used?].

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Signe Flottorp; Atle Fretheim; Kari Håvelsrud; Doris Tove Kristoffersen; Andy Oxman; Olaf Gjerløw Aasland
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2005-02-03

5.  [Laboratory equipment for primary health care should be tested by independent authorities. Scandinavian SKUP is a good alternative].

Authors:  Sverre Sandberg; Gunnar Nordin; Arne Mårtensson; Per Grinsted; Esther Jensen; Camilla Eide Jacobsen; Grete Monsen
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  2008 Nov 12-18

6.  Long-term effects of an education programme on the optimal use of clinical chemistry testing in primary health care.

Authors:  Mirja Mindemark; Anders Larsson
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.713

7.  [Bad quality of sticks examinations].

Authors:  Berit Oddny Riksheim; Wenche Sletbakk Vie; Nina Gade Christensen; Kristin Moberg Aakre; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2008-05-15

8.  Health centres' view of the services provided by a university hospital laboratory: use of satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  Paula Oja; Timo Kouri; Arto Pakarinen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  Reasons for ordering laboratory tests and relationship with frequency of abnormal results.

Authors:  Paul H H Houben; Ron A G Winkens; Trudy van der Weijden; Renee C R M Vossen; André J M Naus; Richard P T M Grol
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.581

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice--a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard; Volkert Siersma; Susanne Reventlow; Ruth Ertmann; Peter Felding; Frans Boch Waldorff
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  Long-term follow-up of patients with elevated serum calcium concentrations in Swedish primary care.

Authors:  Sofia Dalemo; Robert Eggertsen; Per Hjerpe; Svante Jansson; Erik G Almqvist; Kristina Bengtsson Boström
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.581

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.