Literature DB >> 21740318

Suspected versus non-suspected small-for-gestational age fetuses at term: perinatal outcomes.

Jan-Willem Verlijsdonk1, Bjorn Winkens, Kim Boers, Sicco Scherjon, Frans Roumen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal outcomes of suspected versus non-suspected small-for-gestational age fetuses (SGA) at term.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study among all term singleton neonates with a birth weight <10th percentile born in the Parkstad region between 1 January 2006 and 3 March 2008. The subjects were assigned to a prenatally suspected or non-suspected SGA group. Primary outcome was adverse neonatal outcome at birth, defined as a composite of intrauterine fetal death, Apgar <7 at 5 min, or pH umbilical artery <7.05. Secondary outcome included neonatal medium care unit (NMCU) admission ≥ 7 days.
RESULTS: 430 subjects were included in the study; 36.7% was suspected of SGA. In the suspected SGA group mean gestational age at birth and birth weight were significantly lower, whereas maternal morbidity was significantly higher. The incidence of labor induction and elective cesarean section were also significantly higher in the suspected SGA group. Total perinatal mortality was 2.1%. Identification of SGA and subsequent management led to a significant decrease of adverse neonatal outcome at birth, but did not lead to a significant decrease in NMCU admission ≥ 7 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Suspicion of SGA was associated with a more active management of labor and delivery, resulting in a better neonatal outcome at birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21740318     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2011.600793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  9 in total

1.  Neonatal Morbidity of Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates Born at Term in Uncomplicated Pregnancies.

Authors:  Suneet P Chauhan; Madeline Murguia Rice; William A Grobman; Jennifer Bailit; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Risk scores for predicting small for gestational age infants in Japan: The TMM birthree cohort study.

Authors:  Noriyuki Iwama; Taku Obara; Mami Ishikuro; Keiko Murakami; Fumihiko Ueno; Aoi Noda; Tomomi Onuma; Fumiko Matsuzaki; Tetsuro Hoshiai; Masatoshi Saito; Hirohito Metoki; Junichi Sugawara; Nobuo Yaegashi; Shinichi Kuriyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-07-11

4.  Uncomplicated Pregnancies and Ultrasounds for Fetal Growth Restriction: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Hammad; Suneet P Chauhan; Malgorzata Mlynarczyk; Nader Rabie; Chris Goodie; Eugene Chang; Everett F Magann; Alfred Z Abuhamad
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2015-11-16

5.  Metabolomics for predicting fetal growth restriction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Debora Farias Batista Leite; Aude-Claire Morillon; Elias F Melo Júnior; Renato T Souza; Ali S Khashan; Philip N Baker; Louise C Kenny; José Guilherme Cecatti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyond.

Authors:  Debora F B Leite; Jose G Cecatti
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2019-08-21

7.  Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Debora Farias Batista Leite; Aude-Claire Morillon; Elias F Melo Júnior; Renato T Souza; Fergus P McCarthy; Ali Khashan; Philip Baker; Louise C Kenny; Jose Guilherme Cecatti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Standard care informed by the result of a placental growth factor blood test versus standard care alone in women with reduced fetal movement at or after 36+0 weeks' gestation: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lindsay Armstrong-Buisseret; Peter J Godolphin; Lucy Bradshaw; Eleanor Mitchell; Sam Ratcliffe; Claire Storey; Alexander E P Heazell
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2020-02-13

9.  Assessing fetal growth in Africa: Application of the international WHO and INTERGROWTH-21st standards in a Beninese pregnancy cohort.

Authors:  Emmanuel Yovo; Manfred Accrombessi; Gino Agbota; Alice Hocquette; William Atade; Olaiitan T Ladikpo; Murielle Mehoba; Auguste Degbe; Ghyslain Mombo-Ngoma; Achille Massougbodji; Nikki Jackson; Nadine Fievet; Barbara Heude; Jennifer Zeitlin; Valérie Briand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.