AIMS: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is fatal without treatment, and time to defibrillation is an extremely important factor in relation to survival. We performed a cost-benefit analysis of dual dispatch defibrillation by ambulance and fire services in the County of Stockholm, Sweden. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cost-benefit analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of dual dispatch defibrillation. The increased survival rates were estimated from a real-world implemented intervention, and the monetary value of a life (<euro> 2.2 million) was applied to this benefit by using results from a recent stated-preference study. The estimated costs include defibrillators (including expendables/maintenance), training, hospitalisation/health care, fire service call-outs, overhead resources and the dispatch centre. The estimated number of additional saved lives was 16 per year, yielding a benefit-cost ratio of 36. The cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was estimated to be <euro> 13,000, and the cost per saved life was <euro> 60,000. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention of dual dispatch defibrillation by ambulance and fire services in the County of Stockholm had positive economic effects. For the cost-benefit analysis, the return on investment was high and the cost-effectiveness showed levels below the threshold value for economic efficiency used in Sweden. The cost-utility analysis categorises the cost per QALY as medium.
AIMS: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is fatal without treatment, and time to defibrillation is an extremely important factor in relation to survival. We performed a cost-benefit analysis of dual dispatch defibrillation by ambulance and fire services in the County of Stockholm, Sweden. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cost-benefit analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of dual dispatch defibrillation. The increased survival rates were estimated from a real-world implemented intervention, and the monetary value of a life (<euro> 2.2 million) was applied to this benefit by using results from a recent stated-preference study. The estimated costs include defibrillators (including expendables/maintenance), training, hospitalisation/health care, fire service call-outs, overhead resources and the dispatch centre. The estimated number of additional saved lives was 16 per year, yielding a benefit-cost ratio of 36. The cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was estimated to be <euro> 13,000, and the cost per saved life was <euro> 60,000. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention of dual dispatch defibrillation by ambulance and fire services in the County of Stockholm had positive economic effects. For the cost-benefit analysis, the return on investment was high and the cost-effectiveness showed levels below the threshold value for economic efficiency used in Sweden. The cost-utility analysis categorises the cost per QALY as medium.
Authors: Graham Nichol; George Arthur Wells; Karen Kuntz; David Feeny; Will Longstreth; Brian Mahoney; Clay Mann; Ray Lucas; Mark Henry; Ella Huszti; Alice Birnbaum Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: E Brooke Lerner; Ronald F Maio; Herbert G Garrison; Daniel W Spaite; Graham Nichol Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2006-03-24 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: V Salomaa; M Ketonen; H Koukkunen; P Immonen-Räihä; T Jerkkola; P Kärjä-Koskenkari; M Mähönen; M Niemelä; K Kuulasmaa; P Palomäki; J Mustonen; M Arstila; T Vuorenmaa; A Lehtonen; S Lehto; H Miettinen; J Torppa; J Tuomilehto; Y A Kesäniemi; K Pyörälä Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-07-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jacob Hollenberg; Gabriel Riva; Katarina Bohm; Per Nordberg; Robert Larsen; Johan Herlitz; Hans Pettersson; Mårten Rosenqvist; Leif Svensson Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 29.983