Literature DB >> 21739114

Hip abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty with short stems.

Satoshi Kamada1, Masatoshi Naito, Yoshinari Nakamura, Takahiko Kiyama.   

Abstract

Excellent clinical results have been reported for total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a short stem. However, the range of variance in positioning of the stem has been reported to be wide. The authors hypothesized that the short stem position influences the femoral offset (FO) and hip abductor muscle strength (AMS) after surgery. The AMS was evaluated in 64 limbs in 32 patients who underwent unilateral THA using a short stem with a normal contralateral hip. The average time of AMS evaluation was 46.3 months postoperatively. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used for clinical evaluation. The ratio of the AMS on the reconstructed side to that on the contralateral side was calculated (strength ratio). The valgus angle (VA) of each stem and FO was measured on an anteroposterior hip radiograph. The FO ratio, as the normalized FO, was calculated. Linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the relationships among the VA, FO ratio and strength ratio. The average HHS improved from 57.7 points preoperatively to 94.6 points postoperatively. The VA negatively correlated with the FO ratio (r = -0.511, P = 0.028). The strength ratio negatively correlated with the VA (r = -0.505, P = 0.032) and positively correlated with the FO ratio (r = 0.479, P = 0.0056). The average postoperative HHS was generally satisfactory after THA using a short stem. A more valgus postoperative position of the short stem leads to reduced FO, which causes decreasing postoperative AMS after THA with a short stem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21739114     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1350-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  6 in total

1.  Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: comparison between modular short-stem hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Marc Beirer; Patrick Weber; Farhad Mazoochian; Andreas Fottner; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The accuracy of digital templating: a comparison of short-stem total hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Arnd Steinbrück; Lorenz Wanke-Jellinek; Matthias Pietschmann; Volkmar Jansson; Andreas Fottner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  More than a feeling?-Overruling the preoperatively templated offset option leads to a minor offset increase in short stem total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Luger; Christian Stadler; Rainer Hochgatterer; Jakob Allerstorfer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  The contributing factors of tapered wedge stem alignment during mini-invasive total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shinya Hayashi; Takaaki Fujishiro; Shingo Hashimoto; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Test-retest reliability of innovated strength tests for hip muscles.

Authors:  Christophe Meyer; Kristoff Corten; Mariska Wesseling; Koen Peers; Jean-Pierre Simon; Ilse Jonkers; Kaat Desloovere
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies.

Authors:  Jakob van Oldenrijk; Jeroen Molleman; Michel Klaver; Rudolf W Poolman; Daniel Haverkamp
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.