Literature DB >> 21737407

A qualitative study of family involvement in decisions about life support in the intensive care unit.

Jennifer Kryworuchko1, Dawn Stacey, Wendy E Peterson, Daren K Heyland, Ian D Graham.   

Abstract

We explored family involvement in decisions about life support interventions in the intensive care unit study using a critical incident technique to focus on specific case exemplars contributed by participants. A total of 6 family members and 9 health care professionals were interviewed. Participants described 2 options (life support or comfort care) and values associated with options: maintaining quality of life, surviving critical illness, minimizing pain and suffering, not being attached to machines, needing adjustment time, and judicious health care resource use. Barriers to involvement included not being offered alternative options; no specific trigger to initiate decision making; dominant influence of professionals' values; and families lacking understandable information. Family members are unlikely to engage in decision making unless professionals identify the decision and address other barriers to family involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21737407     DOI: 10.1177/1049909111414176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  8 in total

1.  Shared decision making during antenatal counselling for anticipated extremely preterm birth.

Authors:  Conor Barker; Sandra Dunn; Gregory P Moore; Jessica Reszel; Brigitte Lemyre; Thierry Daboval
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 2.  Interventions to support children's engagement in health-related decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bryan Feenstra; Laura Boland; Margaret L Lawson; Denise Harrison; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Michelle Leblanc; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.125

3.  'Conditional candour' and 'knowing me': an interpretive description study on patient preferences for physician behaviours during end-of-life communication.

Authors:  Amane Abdul-Razzak; John You; Diana Sherifali; Jessica Simon; Kevin Brazil
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Patient and family involvement in adult critical and intensive care settings: a scoping review.

Authors:  Michelle Olding; Sarah E McMillan; Scott Reeves; Madeline H Schmitt; Kathleen Puntillo; Simon Kitto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Parental decision making involvement and decisional conflict: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Laura Boland; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Anton Saarimaki; Margaret L Lawson
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Limitation of therapeutic effort experienced by intensive care nurses.

Authors:  Juan Francisco Velarde-García; Raquel Luengo-González; Raquel González-Hervías; César Cardenete-Reyes; Beatriz Álvarez-Embarba; Domingo Palacios-Ceña
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.874

Review 7.  Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Jeff Belkora; B Joyce Davison; Marie-Anne Durand; Karen B Eden; Aubri S Hoffman; Mirjam Koerner; France Légaré; Marie-Chantal Loiselle; Richard L Street
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Factors influencing communication and decision-making about life-sustaining technology during serious illness: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jennifer Kryworuchko; P H Strachan; E Nouvet; J Downar; J J You
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.