Literature DB >> 21737174

ASCL1-coexpression profiling but not single gene expression profiling defines lung adenocarcinomas of neuroendocrine nature with poor prognosis.

Takeshi Fujiwara1, Miyako Hiramatsu, Takayuki Isagawa, Hironori Ninomiya, Kentaro Inamura, Shumpei Ishikawa, Masaru Ushijima, Masaaki Matsuura, Michael H Jones, Miyuki Shimane, Hitoshi Nomura, Yuichi Ishikawa, Hiroyuki Aburatani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma is heterogeneous regarding histology, etiology and prognosis. Although there have been several attempts to find a subgroup with poor prognosis, it is unclear whether or not adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine (NE) nature has unfavorable prognosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To elucidate whether a subtype of adenocarcinoma with NE nature has poor prognosis, we performed gene expression profiling by cDNA microarray for 262 Japanese lung cancer and 30 normal lung samples, including 171 adenocarcinomas, 56 squamous cell carcinomas and 35 NE tumors. A co-expression gene set with ASCL1, an NE master gene, was utilized to classify tumors by non-negative matrix factorization, followed by validation using an ASCL1 knock-down gene set in DMS79 cells as well as an independent cohort (n=139) derived from public microarray databases as a test set.
RESULTS: The co-expression gene set classified the adenocarcinomas into alveolar cell (AL), squamoid, and NE subtypes. The NE subtype, which clustered together almost all the NE tumors, had significantly poorer prognosis than the AL subtype that clustered with normal lung samples (p=0.0075). The knock-down gene set also classified the 171 adenocarcinomas into three subtypes and this NE subtype also had the poorest prognosis. The co-expression gene set classified the independent database-derived American cohort into two subtypes, with the NE subtype having poorer prognosis. None of the single NE gene expression was found to be linked to survival difference.
CONCLUSION: Co-expression gene set with ASCL1, rather than single NE gene expression, successfully identifies an NE subtype of lung adenocarcinoma with poor prognosis.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21737174     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  17 in total

1.  The frequency of neoantigens per somatic mutation rather than overall mutational load or number of predicted neoantigens per se is a prognostic factor in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hirokazu Matsushita; Kosei Hasegawa; Katsutoshi Oda; Shogo Yamamoto; Akira Nishijima; Yuichi Imai; Kayo Asada; Yuji Ikeda; Takahiro Karasaki; Keiichi Fujiwara; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Kazuhiro Kakimi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  ASCL1 and RET expression defines a clinically relevant subgroup of lung adenocarcinoma characterized by neuroendocrine differentiation.

Authors:  F Kosari; C M Ida; M-C Aubry; L Yang; I V Kovtun; J L S Klein; Y Li; S Erdogan; S C Tomaszek; S J Murphy; L C Bolette; C P Kolbert; P Yang; D A Wigle; G Vasmatzis
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Integrative analysis of gene and miRNA expression profiles with transcription factor-miRNA feed-forward loops identifies regulators in human cancers.

Authors:  Zhenyu Yan; Parantu K Shah; Samir B Amin; Mehmet K Samur; Norman Huang; Xujun Wang; Vikas Misra; Hongbin Ji; Dana Gabuzda; Cheng Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Development and validation of a prognostic gene-expression signature for lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yun-Yong Park; Eun Sung Park; Sang Bae Kim; Sang Cheol Kim; Bo Hwa Sohn; In-Sun Chu; Woojin Jeong; Gordon B Mills; Lauren Averett Byers; Ju-Seog Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Identifying CDKN3 Gene Expression as a Prognostic Biomarker in Lung Adenocarcinoma via Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Zang; Min Chen; Yunyun Zhou; Guanghua Xiao; Yang Xie; Xinlei Wang
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2015-05-24

6.  Integrated copy number and expression analysis identifies profiles of whole-arm chromosomal alterations and subgroups with favorable outcome in ovarian clear cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Yuriko Uehara; Katsutoshi Oda; Yuji Ikeda; Takahiro Koso; Shingo Tsuji; Shogo Yamamoto; Kayo Asada; Kenbun Sone; Reiko Kurikawa; Chinami Makii; Otoe Hagiwara; Michihiro Tanikawa; Daichi Maeda; Kosei Hasegawa; Shunsuke Nakagawa; Osamu Wada-Hiraike; Kei Kawana; Masashi Fukayama; Keiichi Fujiwara; Tetsu Yano; Yutaka Osuga; Tomoyuki Fujii; Hiroyuki Aburatani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  COXPRESdb: a database of comparative gene coexpression networks of eleven species for mammals.

Authors:  Takeshi Obayashi; Yasunobu Okamura; Satoshi Ito; Shu Tadaka; Ikuko N Motoike; Kengo Kinoshita
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Gene expression analysis in RA: towards personalized medicine.

Authors:  A N Burska; K Roget; M Blits; L Soto Gomez; F van de Loo; L D Hazelwood; C L Verweij; A Rowe; G N Goulielmos; L G M van Baarsen; F Ponchel
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.550

9.  Mash1 efficiently reprograms rat astrocytes into neurons.

Authors:  Daofang Ding; Leqin Xu; Hao Xu; Xiaofeng Li; Qianqian Liang; Yongjian Zhao; Yongjun Wang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Transcription factor-pathway coexpression analysis reveals cooperation between SP1 and ESR1 on dysregulating cell cycle arrest in non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma.

Authors:  X Wang; Z Yan; M Fulciniti; Y Li; M Gkotzamanidou; S B Amin; P K Shah; Y Zhang; N C Munshi; C Li
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.