Literature DB >> 21736915

Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccination in The Netherlands: parental reasoning underlying child vaccination choices.

Marloes Bults1, Desirée J M A Beaujean, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Jim E van Steenbergen, Hélène A C M Voeten.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: During the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, parents in the Netherlands were recommended to vaccinate healthy children between six months and five years of age. The aim of this study was to examine reasons for (non-)acceptance, risk perception, feelings of doubt and regret, influence of the social network, and information-seeking behavior of parents who accepted or declined H1N1 vaccination.
METHODS: Data on accepters were collected via exit interviews following the second-dose vaccination round in December 2009 (n=1227). Data on decliners were gathered in June and July 2010 with questionnaires (n=1900); 25 parents participated in in-depth interviews.
RESULTS: The most reported reasons for parental acceptance of H1N1 vaccination were "I don't want my child to become sick" (43%), "Mexican flu can be severe" (10%), "the government advises it, so I do it" (6%), and "if I don't do it, I will regret it" (6%). The most reported reasons declining the vaccination were "fear of side effects/harmful consequences" (51%), "just having a bad feeling about it" (46%), and "the vaccine was not thoroughly tested" (39%). More decliners than accepters experienced feelings of doubt about the vaccination decision (decliners 63% versus accepters 51%, p<0.001), and decliners reported more often information-seeking behavior (decliners 76% versus accepters 56%, p<0.001). Decliners more frequently solicited advice from their social network than accepters (decliners 72% versus accepters 61%, p<0.001). Furthermore, accepters more often reported social influence on their vaccination decision (accepters 58% versus decliners 38%, p<0.001) and experienced more negative feelings after their vaccination decision (accepters 8% versus decliners 2%, p<0.001). Immigrant accepters and decliners more often had feelings of doubt and regret about the vaccination decision, solicited advice more often from their social network, and were more often influenced by this advice compared to native Dutch parents.
CONCLUSION: To optimize response rates in future vaccination campaigns, health authorities should provide more information on vaccine benefits and possible risks, tailoring this information to specific risk groups. Health authorities should also invest in the development and implementation of effective vaccine risk/benefit communication tools.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21736915     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  23 in total

1.  Meningococcal serogroup B vaccine: Knowledge and acceptability among parents in Italy.

Authors:  Teresa Morrone; Francesco Napolitano; Luciana Albano; Gabriella Di Giuseppe
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  College students' perceptions of H1N1 flu risk and attitudes toward vaccination.

Authors:  Meagan A Ramsey; Cecile A Marczinski
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  The Mediating Role of the Perceived COVID-19 Vaccine Benefits: Examining Israeli Parents' Perceptions Regarding Their Adolescents' Vaccination.

Authors:  Shiran Bord; Carmit Satran; Ayelet Schor
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Vaccine-hesitant parents' reasons for choosing alternative protection methods in Turkey.

Authors:  Aylin Akca Sumengen; Damla Ozcevik; Hulya Yaren Kursun; Ayse Ferda Ocakci
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2020-12-20

Review 5.  Protecting pediatric oncology patients from influenza.

Authors:  Leslie S Kersun; Anne F Reilly; Susan E Coffin; Kathleen E Sullivan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-01-31

6.  Factors associated with influenza vaccine receipt in community dwelling adults and their children.

Authors:  Ryan Malosh; Suzanne E Ohmit; Joshua G Petrie; Mark G Thompson; Allison E Aiello; Arnold S Monto
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Determinants of refusal of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in a high risk population: a qualitative approach.

Authors:  Eugenie d'Alessandro; Dominique Hubert; Odile Launay; Laurence Bassinet; Olivier Lortholary; Yannick Jaffre; Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Parental information-seeking behaviour in childhood vaccinations.

Authors:  Irene A Harmsen; Gemma G Doorman; Liesbeth Mollema; Robert A C Ruiter; Gerjo Kok; Hester E de Melker
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Comparative Safety of Vaccine Adjuvants: A Summary of Current Evidence and Future Needs.

Authors:  Nikolai Petrovsky
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Why parents refuse childhood vaccination: a qualitative study using online focus groups.

Authors:  Irene A Harmsen; Liesbeth Mollema; Robert A C Ruiter; Theo G W Paulussen; Hester E de Melker; Gerjo Kok
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.