BACKGROUND: The prime-boost HIV vaccine regimen used in the recent RV144 trial resulted in modest efficacy of 31% over 3.5 years, but was substantially higher in the first year post-vaccination. We sought to explore the potential impact of a vaccine with rapidly waning efficacy in a South African population. METHODS: We explored two strategies using a dynamic compartmental epidemic model for heterosexual transmission of HIV: [1] vaccination of a single cohort (30%, 60% or 90% of the initial population), with exponentially waning efficacy, but booster vaccinations at 5- or 2-year intervals, and [2] continuous vaccination of the unvaccinated population at the same coverage levels (30%, 60% or 90%) but with a constant efficacy vaccine of short duration. We also examined potential changes in post-vaccination condom use. RESULTS: The single cohort vaccination strategies did not have a substantial impact on HIV prevalence, although without boosters they still prevented 2-6% of the expected infections at 20 years, depending on the population coverage. The 5-year and 2-year booster strategies prevented 8-24% and 17-45% of the expected infections, respectively. Continuous vaccination to maintain population coverage levels resulted in more substantial reductions in population HIV prevalence and greater numbers of infections prevented: HIV prevalence at 20 years was reduced from 23% to 8-14% and the number of expected infections was decreased by 34-59%, depending on the population coverage level. Moderate changes in post-vaccination condom use did not substantially affect these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: An HIV vaccine with partial efficacy and declining protection similar to the RV144 vaccine could prevent a substantial proportion of HIV infections if booster vaccinations were effective and available. Our estimates of the population impact of vaccination would be improved by further understanding of the duration of protection, the effectiveness of booster vaccination, and whether the vaccine efficacy varies between subpopulations at higher and lower risk of exposure.
BACKGROUND: The prime-boost HIV vaccine regimen used in the recent RV144 trial resulted in modest efficacy of 31% over 3.5 years, but was substantially higher in the first year post-vaccination. We sought to explore the potential impact of a vaccine with rapidly waning efficacy in a South African population. METHODS: We explored two strategies using a dynamic compartmental epidemic model for heterosexual transmission of HIV: [1] vaccination of a single cohort (30%, 60% or 90% of the initial population), with exponentially waning efficacy, but booster vaccinations at 5- or 2-year intervals, and [2] continuous vaccination of the unvaccinated population at the same coverage levels (30%, 60% or 90%) but with a constant efficacy vaccine of short duration. We also examined potential changes in post-vaccination condom use. RESULTS: The single cohort vaccination strategies did not have a substantial impact on HIV prevalence, although without boosters they still prevented 2-6% of the expected infections at 20 years, depending on the population coverage. The 5-year and 2-year booster strategies prevented 8-24% and 17-45% of the expected infections, respectively. Continuous vaccination to maintain population coverage levels resulted in more substantial reductions in population HIV prevalence and greater numbers of infections prevented: HIV prevalence at 20 years was reduced from 23% to 8-14% and the number of expected infections was decreased by 34-59%, depending on the population coverage level. Moderate changes in post-vaccination condom use did not substantially affect these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: An HIV vaccine with partial efficacy and declining protection similar to the RV144 vaccine could prevent a substantial proportion of HIV infections if booster vaccinations were effective and available. Our estimates of the population impact of vaccination would be improved by further understanding of the duration of protection, the effectiveness of booster vaccination, and whether the vaccine efficacy varies between subpopulations at higher and lower risk of exposure.
Authors: R H Gray; M J Wawer; R Brookmeyer; N K Sewankambo; D Serwadda; F Wabwire-Mangen; T Lutalo; X Li; T vanCott; T C Quinn Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-04-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dilys Morgan; Cedric Mahe; Billy Mayanja; J Martin Okongo; Rosemary Lubega; James A G Whitworth Journal: AIDS Date: 2002-03-08 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Paul G Barnett; Adam Chow; Vilija R Joyce; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Susan C Griffin; Bohdan Nosyk; Mark Holodniy; Sheldon T Brown; Mark Sculpher; Aslam H Anis; Douglas K Owens Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: T C Quinn; M J Wawer; N Sewankambo; D Serwadda; C Li; F Wabwire-Mangen; M O Meehan; T Lutalo; R H Gray Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-03-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Maria J Wawer; Ronald H Gray; Nelson K Sewankambo; David Serwadda; Xianbin Li; Oliver Laeyendecker; Noah Kiwanuka; Godfrey Kigozi; Mohammed Kiddugavu; Thomas Lutalo; Fred Nalugoda; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Mary P Meehan; Thomas C Quinn Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-03-30 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Tongqing Zhou; Ivelin Georgiev; Xueling Wu; Zhi-Yong Yang; Kaifan Dai; Andrés Finzi; Young Do Kwon; Johannes F Scheid; Wei Shi; Ling Xu; Yongping Yang; Jiang Zhu; Michel C Nussenzweig; Joseph Sodroski; Lawrence Shapiro; Gary J Nabel; John R Mascola; Peter D Kwong Journal: Science Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Ronald H Gray; Xianbin Li; Maria J Wawer; Stephen J Gange; David Serwadda; Nelson K Sewankambo; Richard Moore; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Tom Lutalo; Thomas C Quinn Journal: AIDS Date: 2003-09-05 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Supachai Rerks-Ngarm; Punnee Pitisuttithum; Sorachai Nitayaphan; Jaranit Kaewkungwal; Joseph Chiu; Robert Paris; Nakorn Premsri; Chawetsan Namwat; Mark de Souza; Elizabeth Adams; Michael Benenson; Sanjay Gurunathan; Jim Tartaglia; John G McNeil; Donald P Francis; Donald Stablein; Deborah L Birx; Supamit Chunsuttiwat; Chirasak Khamboonruang; Prasert Thongcharoen; Merlin L Robb; Nelson L Michael; Prayura Kunasol; Jerome H Kim Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joshua T Herbeck; Kathryn Peebles; Paul T Edlefsen; Morgane Rolland; James T Murphy; Geoffrey S Gottlieb; Neil Abernethy; James I Mullins; John E Mittler; Steven M Goodreau Journal: Vaccine Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Beverly D Bradley; Tiffany Jung; Ananya Tandon-Verma; Bassem Khoury; Timothy C Y Chan; Yu-Ling Cheng Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2017-04-18
Authors: Blythe Adamson; Louis Garrison; Ruanne V Barnabas; Josh J Carlson; James Kublin; Dobromir Dimitrov Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 5.396