Literature DB >> 21736451

Similarity between brain activity at encoding and retrieval predicts successful realization of delayed intentions.

Sam J Gilbert1, Diana J N Armbruster, Maria Panagiotidi.   

Abstract

Remembering delayed intentions can be highly demanding. Accuracy in laboratory paradigms assessing prospective memory (PM) is typically well below ceiling, and failure to remember intended behaviors after a delay is a common occurrence in everyday life. However, relatively little is known of the potential differences in brain activity that distinguish successful versus unsuccessful PM. In this fMRI study, participants repeatedly encoded, stored, and then had the opportunity to retrieve intended behaviors while engaged in a distracting ongoing task. This yielded a success rate of approximately two thirds. Overall levels of brain activity distinguished successful versus unsuccessful trials at all three stages (encoding, storage, and retrieval), suggesting multiple neural determinants of PM success. In addition, the voxelwise similarity between patterns of brain activity at encoding and retrieval was greater for successful than unsuccessful trials. This was true even in posterior cingulate, which showed opposite patterns of signal change between encoding and retrieval. Thus, successful realization of delayed intentions may be associated with reinstatement of encoding context at the time of retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21736451     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Complementary role of frontoparietal activity and cortical pattern similarity in successful episodic memory encoding.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  How do we process event-based and time-based intentions in the brain? an fMRI study of prospective memory in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Julie Gonneaud; Géraldine Rauchs; Mathilde Groussard; Brigitte Landeau; Florence Mézenge; Vincent de La Sayette; Francis Eustache; Béatrice Desgranges
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Differential functional response in the posteromedial cortices and hippocampus to stimulus repetition during successful memory encoding.

Authors:  Patrizia Vannini; Trey Hedden; Caroline Sullivan; Reisa A Sperling
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural evidence of the strategic choice between working memory and episodic memory in prospective remembering.

Authors:  Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Jonathan D Cohen; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  The encoding/retrieval flip: interactions between memory performance and memory stage and relationship to intrinsic cortical networks.

Authors:  Willem Huijbers; Aaron P Schultz; Patrizia Vannini; Donald G McLaren; Sarah E Wigman; Andrew M Ward; Trey Hedden; Reisa A Sperling
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Parahippocampal cortex activation during context reinstatement predicts item recollection.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-08-12

7.  Lesser Neural Pattern Similarity across Repeated Tests Is Associated with Better Long-Term Memory Retention.

Authors:  Linnea Karlsson Wirebring; Carola Wiklund-Hörnqvist; Johan Eriksson; Micael Andersson; Bert Jonsson; Lars Nyberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Intention concepts and brain-machine interfacing.

Authors:  Franziska Thinnes-Elker; Olga Iljina; John Kyle Apostolides; Felicitas Kraemer; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Ad Aertsen; Tonio Ball
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-09

9.  When planning results in loss of control: intention-based reflexivity and working-memory.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Automaticity and control in prospective memory: a computational model.

Authors:  Sam J Gilbert; Nicola Hadjipavlou; Matthieu Raoelison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.