Literature DB >> 21735534

Treatment of a degenerative stenosed CoreValve(®) aortic bioprosthesis by transcatheter valve-in-valve insertion.

Christoph Hammerstingl1, Georg Nickenig, Eberhard Grube.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI) is an emerging therapy in patients at high risk for open heart surgery. The long-term durability of the bioprosthesis is unknown. This is the first report of a severely degeneratively stenosed 2nd generation 26 mm CoreValve(®) aortic bioprosthesis which occurred five and a half years after TAVI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A 92-year-old patient presented with decompensated heart failure NYHA class IV, pulmonary edema, and severe pulmonary hypertension. Echocardiography revealed critical AV-stenosis due to heavily calcified bioprosthetic valve leaflets. Due to high surgical risk with an EuroSCORE of 64.97% and a STS-mortality score of 27.0%, we decided to attempt a valve-in-valve insertion of a 3rd generation CoreValve(®) prosthesis of the same size. Following the delicate retrograde passage of the calcified valve with a preformed stiff wire, balloon valvuloplasty of the severely stenosed CoreValve(®) prosthesis under rapid right ventricular pacing was complicated by two balloon catheter ruptures. Insertion of the 3rd generation CoreValve(®) prosthesis of the same size was quite complex but finally it was successfully completed. There was mild periprosthetic regurgitation and significant decrease in transaortic pressure without residual transvalvular gradient immediately after TAVI. Echocardiography and clinical follow-up at 72 hr after TAVI confirmed excellent valve function with a decrease in systolic pulmonary artery pressure from 70 mm Hg to 35 mm Hg, increase in LV-EF from 35% to 45%, and improvement of functional status from NYHA IV to NYHA II. The patient was discharged in good medical conditions at day eight.
CONCLUSION: Degenerative stenosis of a CoreValve(®) bioprothesis may be observed during long-term follow-up after successful TAVI for the treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis. A second valve-in-valve insertion appears feasible but may require particular interventional approaches.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21735534     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

Review 1.  Complementary role of cardiac CT in the assessment of aortic valve replacement dysfunction.

Authors:  Alastair J Moss; Marc R Dweck; John G Dreisbach; Michelle C Williams; Sze Mun Mak; Timothy Cartlidge; Edward D Nicol; Gareth J Morgan-Hughes
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-11-02

2.  The Nordic aortic valve intervention (NOTION) trial comparing transcatheter versus surgical valve implantation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hans Gustav Thyregod; Lars Søndergaard; Nikolaj Ihlemann; Olaf Franzen; Lars Willy Andersen; Peter Bo Hansen; Peter Skov Olsen; Henrik Nissen; Per Winkel; Christian Gluud; Daniel Andreas Steinbrüchel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation of a CoreValve in a JenaValve prosthesis: a case report.

Authors:  Shahram Lotfi; Michael Becker; Ajay Moza; Rüdiger Autschbach; Nikolaus Marx; Jörg Schröder
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.