Literature DB >> 21735523

Thrombus aspiration alone during primary percutanous coronary intervention as definitive treatment in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Miranda C Kramer1, Niels C Verouden, Xiaofei Li, Karel T Koch, Allard C van der Wal, Jan G Tijssen, Robbert J de Winter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In some patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutanous coronary intervention (pPCI) with thrombus aspiration, residual stenosis after thrombus aspiration is non-significant and additional balloon dilatation or stent placement may be unnecessary. We investigated the angiographic, procedural, and clinical outcomes of these patients in our single center pPCI-database. In addition, to gain insight in the pathological mechanisms of coronary thrombosis in these patients, we established the histopathological characteristics and age of the aspirated material.
METHODS: This study consists of STEMI patients who underwent pPCI with thrombus aspiration alone in our institution. Thrombus material was collected and processed and the sections were analyzed for the presence of fresh (<1 day) or older thrombus (>1 day) and plaque components. One year clinical follow-up was obtained and vital status was assessed up to March 2010.
RESULTS: We identified 16 STEMI patients who underwent thrombus aspiration alone as the definitive treatment during pPCI. Acceptable flow with minimal non-significant residual stenosis immediately after thrombus aspiration was present in 14 patients (88%). In four patients (25%) repeat angiography was performed after several days and disappearance of the residual thrombus could be confirmed in three patients. During follow-up, repeat target lesion revascularization was performed in one patient at 53 days. No recurrent myocardial infarction was observed. Two patients died 1,166 and 1,228 days after the index-event from non-cardiac causes.
CONCLUSIONS: In selected STEMI patients undergoing pPCI, thrombus aspiration alone is feasible and safe on the short-term and there appears to be no high risk of recurrent ischemic events during follow-up. Our results suggest that additional balloon inflation or stent implantation may be unnecessary in selected patients, when there is no significant residual stenosis after thrombus aspiration.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21735523     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

Review 1.  Thrombus aspiration in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Karim D Mahmoud; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  'Mechanical thrombectomy alone' as a definite therapy for rescue angioplasty.

Authors:  Gohar Jamil; Husam Ouda; Mujgan Jamil; Anwer Qureshi
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-03-18

3.  "Lone aspiration thrombectomy" without stenting in young patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gohar Jamil; Mujgan Jamil; Ahmed Abbas; Swapna Sainudheen; Sadek Mokahal; Anwer Qureshi
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-06-10

4.  A novel treatment using a guide extension catheter and distal protection device for refractory coronary embolism: case report.

Authors:  Hirofumi Kusumoto; Katsuyuki Hasegawa; Kasumi Ishibuchi; Satoru Otsuji
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-01-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.