| Literature DB >> 21735056 |
Naoshi Ishikawa1, Ken-Ichi Nakamura, Naotaka Izumiyama, Junko Aida, Motoji Sawabe, Tomio Arai, Hiroshi Kishimoto, Mutsunori Fujiwara, Akio Ishii, Kaiyo Takubo.
Abstract
Many studies have demonstrated the association between telomere length in mitotic cells and aging, but the relationship between telomere length in post-mitotic cells and aging in human populations has remained largely unclear. In this study, we assessed the dynamics of telomere length (terminal restriction fragment length-TRF) in normal pituitary glands obtained at autopsy from 65 patients aged between 0 and 100 years. The initial length (the value for neonatal pituitary) was 14.2 ± 1.1 kbp (mean of the median TRF value ± SD), being the longest among those for other systemic organs. The annual telomere reduction rates for pituitary (21 bp) were equivalent to or below the lowest values for various cells and tissues. Hence, comparison of TRF lengths among organs revealed that the pituitary gland retained longer telomeres than most other organs throughout life. The median TRF value showed a significant decrease between newborns and the 61-75 age group, but then leveled off or increased slightly in advanced age groups. These data indicate that innate telomere length is highly conserved in the pituitary and suggest that pituitary telomere length provides a good basic indicator for studies of telomere biology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21735056 PMCID: PMC3682069 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-011-9280-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Age (Dordr) ISSN: 0161-9152
Fig. 1Southern blot analysis of terminal restriction fragments (TRF) from pituitary and systemic organs. a Representative TRF signals of the pituitary samples obtained from three neonates (case #8, 38 weeks of gestation—lanes 1 and 2; case#4, 35 weeks of gestation—lanes 3 and 4; case #5, 36 weeks of gestation—lanes 5 and 6). The restriction enzyme employed was either HinfI (lanes 1, 3, 5) or RsaI (lanes 2, 4, 6). The median values (kbp) for the signals were 14.0, 13.3, 13.4, 12.9, 14.4, and 13.7, respectively. b Representative HinfI-digested TRF signals obtained from a premature neonate (case #1, 21 weeks of gestation; 1 heart, 2 skin, 3 scalp, 4 adrenal gland, 5 liver, 6 pituitary gland). The median values (kbp) for the signals were 14.8, 13.2, 13.0, 14.6, 15.1, and 15.4, respectively. c Representative HinfI-digested TRF signals obtained from a centenarian (case #62; 1 cerebral gray matter, 2 cerebral white matter, 3 heart, 4 liver, 5 kidney, 6 adrenal gland, 7 pancreas, 8 thyroid, 9 tongue, 10 skin, 11 scalp, 12 muscle, 13 pituitary gland). The median values (kbp) for the signals were 8.7, 7.9, 9.2, 6.6, 8.0, 8.1, 7.5, 8.5, 7.8, 7.4, 7.8, 8.5, and 9.1, respectively. Size marker (λ/HindIII) positions are indicated on the left. The mean values (the median values calculated using the Telometric software package, and the peak values of signal intensity) of repeated experiments are summarized in the supplementary table (Supplementary material, Table S1)
Fig. 2Telomere dynamics with aging. First scatter plot analysis of representative TRF values obtained from HinfI-digested samples as a function of donor age over the full range yields a decreasing regression line for each representative [median values; filled circles (n = 63), solid line]. Second scatter plot analysis of the TRF values for individuals aged 60 years and older yields an increasing regression line for each representative [median values; filled circles (n = 48), dashed line]
Fig. 3Comparison of TRF lengths for the pituitary gland in the four age groups: 0–1, 61–75, 76–90, and >90 years. Mean values (±SD) of individual median TRF length for HinfI-digested samples from the four age groups were calculated and compared using ANOVA and post hoc tests. The mean value (±SD) for neonates and infants (n = 13) was 14.2 ± 1.1 kbp. The values for the older age groups were 11.6 ± 1.5 kbp for subjects aged 61–75 years (n = 14), 12.4 ± 1.3 kbp for those aged 76–90 years (n = 17), and 12.3 ± 1.3 kbp for those aged >90 years (n = 17, including two centenarians). The p value by ANOVA was <0.0001. Each of the differences between the neonates–infants versus the three older age groups was significant by both Tukey–Kramer test and Bonferroni–Dunn test (significant difference, p < 0.0083, is indicated by asterisks, and p values presented in parentheses were calculated by the latter test): 61–75 (p < 0.0001), 76–90 (p = 0.0007), and >90 (p = 0.0002), respectively. However, there were no significant differences between any of the combinations among the other three age groups
Fig. 4Relationship between the peak values of TRF signal intensity and the median values calculated using the Telometric software package. Scatter plot analysis of TRF lengths for HinfI-digested samples provides a robust correlation between the peak values (y-axis) and the median values (x-axis), yielding a regression line
Fig. 5Comparison between two scatter plot analyses: one regression line was obtained from the median values of TRF as a function of donor age (see Fig. 2), and the other was obtained from the peak values of TRF as a function of donor age. To analyze statistically the relationship between the median values and the peak values of pituitary TRF, we applied a multiple regression model that related Y (TRF length) to X 1 (age) and X 2 (group), given that the value for the median group was 1 and that for the peak group was 0: Y = β 0 + β 1 X 1(age) + β 2 X 2(group). The group coefficient (β 2) of the median versus peak values was −0.043 kbp (p = 0.90)
Fig. 6Cancer death rate in older Japanese age groups. The older patients were divided into three age groups (61–75, 76–90, and >90 years). The cancer death rate was 79% for subjects aged 61–75 years (n = 11/14), 35% for those aged 76–90 years (n = 6/17), and 12% for those aged >90 years (n = 2/17, including two centenarians). Each of the differences between the 61–75-year group versus the two older age groups was significant by Pearson’s chi-squared test (significant difference, p < 0.05, is indicated by asterisks, and p values are presented in parentheses): 76–90 years (p = 0.016) and >90 years (p = 0.0002), respectively