Literature DB >> 21734474

Evolution in endometrial cancer: evidence from an immunohistochemical study.

Ingrid Vandenput1, Jone Trovik, Karin Leunen, Elisabeth Wik, Ingunn Stefansson, Lars Akslen, Philippe Moerman, Ignace Vergote, Helga Salvesen, Frédéric Amant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is poorly described how endometrial cancer biology changes during tumor evolution. We hypothesize that characterization of molecular targets in recurrent lesions is more relevant for targeting treatment.
METHODS: Paired biopsies from primary and recurrent endometrial cancer tumors (n = 85) were stained immunohistochemically for the following proteins: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), stathmin (correlating with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity), HER-2/neu, WT1 (Wilms tumor gene 1), phospho-mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR), and p53. Each tumor was scored, using a semiquantitative and subjective grading system. Discordance, a change in expression between primary and recurrent tumor, was defined as ≥ 2 step change; concordance was ≤ 1 step change. The frequency of change was correlated with established prognostic markers in endometrial cancer.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (67%) were diagnosed with endometrioid carcinoma, 23 (27%) with serous/clear cell carcinoma. A change in expression between primary and recurrent tumor was noted in 7% to 31% of patients for ER, PR, stathmin, HER-2/neu, WT1, p-mTOR, and p53. Concordant-positive cases for PR were significantly correlated with stage, tumor grade, and histological subtype. Expression of ER, p53, and p-mTOR in cytoplasm in the recurrent tumor correlated significantly with survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial cancer biology changes over time. The decision on targeted treatment should preferably be based on recurrent tumor characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21734474     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31820575f5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current status of molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  H M J Werner; H B Salvesen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  High stathmin expression is a marker for poor clinical outcome in endometrial cancer: An NRG oncology group/gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Henry D Reyes; Jeffrey Miecznikowski; Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet; Eric J Devor; Yuping Zhang; Kristina W Thiel; Megan I Samuelson; Megan McDonald; Jean-Marie Stephan; Parviz Hanjani; Saketh Guntupalli; Krishnansu S Tewari; Floor Backes; Nilsa Ramirez; Gini F Fleming; Virginia Filiaci; Michael J Birrer; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Phase II Trial of Cabozantinib in Recurrent/Metastatic Endometrial Cancer: A Study of the Princess Margaret, Chicago, and California Consortia (NCI9322/PHL86).

Authors:  Neesha C Dhani; Hal W Hirte; Lisa Wang; Julia V Burnier; Angela Jain; Marcus O Butler; Stephen Welch; Gini F Fleming; Jean Hurteau; Koji Matsuo; Daniela Matei; Waldo Jimenez; Carolyn Johnston; Mihaela Cristea; Katia Tonkin; Prafull Ghatage; Stephanie Lheureux; Anjali Mehta; Judy Quintos; Qian Tan; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Olga Ludkovski; Ming-Sound Tsao; John J Wright; Amit M Oza
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 overexpression and amplification in metastatic and recurrent high grade or type 2 endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Rina Kato; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Risa Ishii; Akiko Owaki; Yutaka Torii; Shuko Oe; Hiroshi Hirasawa; Yoichi Kobayashi; Yasuhiro Udagawa
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Cancer of the corpus uteri: 2021 update.

Authors:  Martin Koskas; Frédéric Amant; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Carien L Creutzberg
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

6.  Tumor grade and chemotherapy response in endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Brittany A Davidson; Jonathan Foote; Leslie H Clark; Gloria Broadwater; Jessie Ehrisman; Paola Gehrig; Whitney Graybill; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Laura J Havrilesky
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-04-27

7.  Stathmin protein level, a potential predictive marker for taxane treatment response in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Henrica M J Werner; Jone Trovik; Mari K Halle; Elisabeth Wik; Lars A Akslen; Even Birkeland; Therese Bredholt; Ingvild L Tangen; Camilla Krakstad; Helga B Salvesen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.