Rebecca M Crabb1, Samantha Rafie, Kenneth R Weingardt. 1. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Administration Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, Calif., USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adults aged 65 years and older stand to benefit from the accumulating wealth of Internet-based health resources, including online interventions to assist in the self-management of chronic health conditions. However, concerns have been expressed that lesser Internet use and familiarity among older adults may limit the utility of web-based health interventions in older age groups. As these interventions become more prevalent, it is important to understand older adults' receptivity to using the Internet as a tool in managing healthcare. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to gauge the extent to which older primary care patients are receptive to using web-based health resources, and to explore how health-related Internet use may be related to patient characteristics such as age, income, and health and mental health status. METHODS: We surveyed 50 adults aged 65 years and older in a Veterans Administration primary care clinic regarding: (1) Internet use for any purpose, (2) Internet use to obtain health or mental-related information, and (3) interest in using Internet-based interventions to address various health-related needs. A substantial proportion of respondents were in their 70s, 80s, and 90s, and many had multiple medical conditions. RESULTS: Nearly three-quarters of older primary care patients in our sample were regular Internet users and over half had experience in using the Internet to search for health information. The majority of Internet users endorsed an interest in using web-based resources to manage various aspects of their health and mental healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the conclusion that older primary care patients, including those among the oldest-old and those with multiple medical conditions, are amenable to using the Internet as a means of enhancing healthcare.
BACKGROUND: Adults aged 65 years and older stand to benefit from the accumulating wealth of Internet-based health resources, including online interventions to assist in the self-management of chronic health conditions. However, concerns have been expressed that lesser Internet use and familiarity among older adults may limit the utility of web-based health interventions in older age groups. As these interventions become more prevalent, it is important to understand older adults' receptivity to using the Internet as a tool in managing healthcare. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to gauge the extent to which older primary care patients are receptive to using web-based health resources, and to explore how health-related Internet use may be related to patient characteristics such as age, income, and health and mental health status. METHODS: We surveyed 50 adults aged 65 years and older in a Veterans Administration primary care clinic regarding: (1) Internet use for any purpose, (2) Internet use to obtain health or mental-related information, and (3) interest in using Internet-based interventions to address various health-related needs. A substantial proportion of respondents were in their 70s, 80s, and 90s, and many had multiple medical conditions. RESULTS: Nearly three-quarters of older primary care patients in our sample were regular Internet users and over half had experience in using the Internet to search for health information. The majority of Internet users endorsed an interest in using web-based resources to manage various aspects of their health and mental healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the conclusion that older primary care patients, including those among the oldest-old and those with multiple medical conditions, are amenable to using the Internet as a means of enhancing healthcare.
Authors: Yuri Quintana; Darren Fahy; Bradley Crotty; Ruchira Jain; Eli Kaldany; Maxwel Gorenberg; Lewis Lipsitz; Diane Engorn; Jorge Rodriguez; Alex Orfanos; Adarsha Bajracharya; Juan Henao; May Adra; David Skerry; Warner V Slack; Charles Safran Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-12-05
Authors: Rebecca G Mishuris; Max Stewart; Gemmae M Fix; Thomas Marcello; D Keith McInnes; Timothy P Hogan; Judith B Boardman; Steven R Simon Journal: Health Expect Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Shira H Fischer; Daniel David; Bradley H Crotty; Meghan Dierks; Charles Safran Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Christine Rini; Laura S Porter; Tamara J Somers; Daphne C McKee; Robert F DeVellis; Meredith Smith; Gary Winkel; David K Ahern; Roberta Goldman; Jamie L Stiller; Cara Mariani; Carol Patterson; Joanne M Jordan; David S Caldwell; Francis J Keefe Journal: Pain Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Nicole Je Horevoorts; Pauline Aj Vissers; Floortje Mols; Melissa Sy Thong; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Wouter A Spoelman; Tobias N Bonten; Margot W M de Waal; Ton Drenthen; Ivo J M Smeele; Markus M J Nielen; Niels H Chavannes Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: D Wittmann; A Mehta; L Northouse; R Dunn; T Braun; A Duby; L An; L Arab; R Bangs; S Bober; J Brandon; M Coward; M Dunn; M Galbraith; M Garcia; J Giblin; M Glode; B Koontz; A Lowe; S Mitchell; J Mulhall; C Nelson; K Paich; C Saigal; T Skolarus; J Stanford; T Walsh; C E Pollack Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 4.430