BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Increasing BP during maintenance hemodialysis or intradialytic hypertension is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In hemodialysis patients, ambulatory BP measurements predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes better than in-center measurements. We hypothesized that patients with intradialytic hypertension have higher interdialytic ambulatory systolic BP than those without intradialytic hypertension. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We performed a case-control study in adult hemodialysis patients. Cases consisted of subjects with intradialytic-hypertension (systolic BP increase ≥10 mmHg from pre- to posthemodialysis in at least four of six treatments), and controls were subjects with ≥10 mmHg decreases from pre- to posthemodialysis in at least four of six treatments. The primary outcome was mean interdialytic 44-hour systolic ambulatory BP. RESULTS: Fifty subjects with a mean age of 54.5 years were enrolled (25 per group) among whom 80% were men, 86% diabetic, 62% Hispanic, and 38% African American. The mean prehemodialysis systolic BP for the intradialytic-hypertension and control groups were 144.0 and 155.5 mmHg, respectively. Mean posthemodialysis systolic BP was 159.0 and 128.1 mmHg, for the intradialytic-hypertension and control groups, respectively. The mean systolic ambulatory BP was 155.4 and 142.4 mmHg for the intradialytic-hypertension and control groups, respectively (P = 0.005). Both daytime and nocturnal systolic BP were higher among those with intradialytic hypertension as compared with controls. There was no difference in interdialytic weight gain between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Time-integrated BP burden as measured by 44-hour ambulatory BP is higher in hemodialysis patients with intradialytic hypertension than those without intradialytic hypertension.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Increasing BP during maintenance hemodialysis or intradialytic hypertension is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In hemodialysis patients, ambulatory BP measurements predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes better than in-center measurements. We hypothesized that patients with intradialytic hypertension have higher interdialytic ambulatory systolic BP than those without intradialytic hypertension. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We performed a case-control study in adult hemodialysis patients. Cases consisted of subjects with intradialytic-hypertension (systolic BP increase ≥10 mmHg from pre- to posthemodialysis in at least four of six treatments), and controls were subjects with ≥10 mmHg decreases from pre- to posthemodialysis in at least four of six treatments. The primary outcome was mean interdialytic 44-hour systolic ambulatory BP. RESULTS: Fifty subjects with a mean age of 54.5 years were enrolled (25 per group) among whom 80% were men, 86% diabetic, 62% Hispanic, and 38% African American. The mean prehemodialysis systolic BP for the intradialytic-hypertension and control groups were 144.0 and 155.5 mmHg, respectively. Mean posthemodialysis systolic BP was 159.0 and 128.1 mmHg, for the intradialytic-hypertension and control groups, respectively. The mean systolic ambulatory BP was 155.4 and 142.4 mmHg for the intradialytic-hypertension and control groups, respectively (P = 0.005). Both daytime and nocturnal systolic BP were higher among those with intradialytic hypertension as compared with controls. There was no difference in interdialytic weight gain between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Time-integrated BP burden as measured by 44-hour ambulatory BP is higher in hemodialysis patients with intradialytic hypertension than those without intradialytic hypertension.
Authors: Roger B Mendes; Sergio F F Santos; David Dorigo; George A Mansoor; Susan T Crowley; William B White; Aldo J Peixoto Journal: Blood Press Monit Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 1.444
Authors: Sergio F F Santos; Roger B Mendes; Carlos A Santos; David Dorigo; Aldo J Peixoto Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: M Cirit; F Akçiçek; E Terzioğlu; C Soydaş; E Ok; C F Ozbaşli; A Başçi; E J Mees Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 1995 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: J P Kooman; U Gladziwa; G Böcker; J A Wijnen; L Bortel; A J Luik; P W de Leeuw; J P van Hoff; K M Leunissen Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 1992 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Jula K Inrig; Peter Van Buren; Catherine Kim; Wanpen Vongpatanasin; Thomas J Povsic; Robert Toto Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Tariq Shafi; Stephen M Sozio; Karen J Bandeen-Roche; Patti L Ephraim; Jason R Luly; Wendy L St Peter; Aidan McDermott; Julia J Scialla; Deidra C Crews; Navdeep Tangri; Dana C Miskulin; Wieneke M Michels; Bernard G Jaar; Charles A Herzog; Philip G Zager; Klemens B Meyer; Albert W Wu; L Ebony Boulware Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: O A Gutiérrez-Adrianzén; M E A Moraes; A P Almeida; J W O Lima; M F Marinho; A L Marques; J P V Madeiro; L Nepomuceno; J M S da Silva; G B Silva; E F Daher; C R M Rodrigues Sobrinho Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Amith Roy Shamir; Ameet Karembelkar; Jonathan Yabes; Yi Yao; Dana Miskulin; Jennifer Gassman; David Ploth; Lavinia Negrea; Susan Paine; Mahboob Rahman; Raymond Y Kwong; Philip Zager; Manisha Jhamb Journal: Kidney Blood Press Res Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 2.687