| Literature DB >> 21733993 |
Marina Grigorova1, Margus Punab, Birutė Zilaitienė, Juris Erenpreiss, Kristo Ausmees, Valentinas Matuleviĉius, Igor Tsarev, Niels Jørgensen, Maris Laan.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The detailed role of FSH in contributing to male testicular function and fertility has been debated. We have previously identified the association between the T-allele of the FSHB promoter polymorphism (rs10835638; G/T, -211 bp from the mRNA start) and significantly reduced male serum FSH.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21733993 PMCID: PMC3298437 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-0632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 0021-972X Impact factor: 5.958
General characteristics of the study cohort of Baltic young men (n = 1054)
| General characteristics | Median (25th–75th %ile) |
|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 19.8 (18.5–21.4) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.1 (20.7–23.5) |
| Ejaculation abstinence period (h) | 87.0 (63.0–135.0) |
| Total testes volume (ml) | 50.0 (42.0–55.0) |
Male reproductive parameters in the Baltic young men cohort stratified by the FSHB rs10835638 (−211 G/T) genotype
| Parameter | TT-genotype | GT-genotype | GG-genotype | Additive model | Recessive model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-allele effect | T-allele effect | ||||||
| No. of men | 14 | 244 | 796 | ||||
| Sertoli cell function, semen quantity, and quality | |||||||
| FSH (IU/liter) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 2.4 (1.3) | 2.7 (1.5) | 3.2 (1.7) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 2.4 (1.3–3.0) | 2.3 (1.8–3.4) | 2.9 (2.0–3.9) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 1.8 (1.3–2.4) | 2.0 (1.7–2.3) | 2.3 (2.0–2.7) | −0.41 | 7.08 × 10−2 | −0.59 | |
| Inhibin-B (pg/ml) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 185 (161) | 219 (76) | 232 (78) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 161 (124–250) | 209 (165–260) | 224 (177–277) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 142 (115–174) | 172 (155–191) | 180 (163–199) | −14.67 | −44.75 | ||
| Inhibin-B/FSH | |||||||
| Mean ( | 107 (81) | 107 (72) | 99 (80) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 80 (35–165) | 93 (52–144) | 77 (48–127) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 80 (52–123) | 87 (70–108) | 77 (62–85) | 6.87 × 10−2 | 7.14 | 9.64 × 10−1 | 0.69 |
| Total testes volume (ml) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 40 (13) | 49 (10) | 49 (10) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 41 (31–47) | 50 (42–55) | 50 (42–55) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 38 (33–42) | 46 (44–49) | 47 (45–49) | −1.64 | −9.47 | ||
| Total sperm count per ejaculate (million) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 250 (223) | 259 (255) | 278 (283) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 185 (46–459) | 194 (105–324) | 213 (103–363) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 162 (93–282) | 222 (188–261) | 216 (193–242) | 5.41 × 10−1 | −12.54 | 5.46 × 10−1 | −44.86 |
| Sperm concentration (million/ml) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 54 (41) | 79 (80) | 83 (72) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 52 (1178) | 61 (35–97) | 65 (35–109) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 42 (25–69) | 63 (55–73) | 63 (57–70) | 3.14 × 10−1 | −4.11 | 1.27 × 10−1 | −20.90 |
| Semen volume (ml) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 4.2 (1.8) | 3.4 (1.6) | 3.5 (1.6) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 4.3 (2.1–5.7) | 3.3 (2.3–4.4) | 3.2 (2.2–4.5) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 3.9 (3.0–5.0) | 3.5 (3.2–3.7) | 3.4 (3.2–3.6) | 6.35 × 10−1 | 0.05 | 2.60 × 10−1 | 0.52 |
| Morphologically normal (%) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 10.4 (3.9) | 12.2 (4.79) | 11.6 (4.9) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 10.5 (7.0–13.3) | 12.0 (8.3–16.0) | 12.0 (8.0–15.0) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 9.0 (6.8–12.1) | 10.5 (9.4–11.7) | 9.8 (8.9–10.9) | 2.41 × 10−1 | 0.45 | 5.13 × 10−1 | −0.94 |
| AB motile (%) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 59 (9) | 58 (14) | 56 (14) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 59 (53–66) | 59 (50–66) | 58 (49–66) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 55 (46–65) | 54 (49–59) | 51 (47–56) | 4.1 × 10−2 | 2.23 | 5.00 × 10−1 | 3.00 |
| ABC motile (%) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 73 (7) | 72 (11) | 71 (12) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 73 (67–79) | 73 (65–81) | 73 (64–80) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 69 (62–78) | 68 (64–72) | 67 (63–71) | 2.19 × 10−1 | 1.14 | 5.36 × 10−1 | 2.32 |
| Leydig cell function | |||||||
| LH (IU/liter) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 5.2 (2.4) | 4.1 (1.6) | 4.0 (1.7) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 4.3 (3.6–6.3) | 3.8 (2.9–5.1) | 3.8 (2.8–4.9) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 5.0 (4.0–6.4) | 4.0 (3.5–4.5) | 4.0 (3.5–4.5) | 1.57 × 10−1 | 0.15 | 1.07 | |
| Total testosterone (nmol/liter) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 25 (8) | 26 (9) | 28 (9) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 27 (18–32) | 25 (20–31) | 27 (21–33) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 23 (19–27) | 24 (21–26) | 25 (23–28) | −1.46 | 3.75 × 10−1 | −2.02 | |
| Testosterone/LH | |||||||
| Mean ( | 5.5 (2.7) | 7.3 (3.3) | 7.9 (3.8) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 5.1 (3.2–6.5) | 6.7 (5.9–8.7) | 7.2 (5.3–9.8) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 4.5 (3.4–5.8) | 6.0 (5.2–6.8) | 6.4 (5.6–7.2) | −0.64 | −1.98 | ||
| Free testosterone (%) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 2.26 (0.53) | 2.30 (0.41) | 2.32 (0.42) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 2.18 (1.86–2.68) | 2.32 (2.03–2.58) | 2.34 (2.02–2.59) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 2.25 (2.02–2.51) | 2.27 (2.15–2.40) | 2.30 (2.18–2.43) | 3.34 × 10−1 | −0.03 | 7.86 × 10−1 | −0.03 |
| Estradiol (pmol/liter) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 102 (33) | 93 (25) | 95 (25) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 105 (70–129) | 90 (77–107) | 91 (78–108) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 84 (72–97) | 76 (71–82) | 78 (73–84) | 8.19 × 10−1 | −0.35 | 2.66 × 10−1 | 7.20 |
| Testosterone/estradiol | |||||||
| Mean ( | 0.25 (0.04) | 0.29 (0.08) | 0.30 (0.09) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 0.25 (0.20–0.28) | 0.28 (0.23–0.34) | 0.29 (0.24–0.35) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 0.27 (0.23–0.32) | 0.31 (0.28–0.34) | 0.32 (0.30–0.35) | −0.01 | 4.63 × 10−2 | −0.04 | |
| SHBG (nmol/liter) | |||||||
| Mean ( | 35 (16) | 35 (16) | 34 (13) | ||||
| Median (25–75%) | 32 (26–49) | 31 (25–41) | 32 (25–42) | ||||
| Adjusted median (95% CI) | 30 (24–37) | 31 (28–35) | 31 (28–34) | 9.55 × 10−1 | −0.05 | 9.13 × 10−1 | −0.36 |
CI, Confidence interval.
Marker-trait association testing was performed using linear regression (additive, recessive models) with the adjustment for age, BMI, smoking status, and recruitment center. Hormone measurements were additionally corrected for blood sampling hour, and semen parameters were corrected for ejaculation abstinence period. Statistically significant associations after correction for two applied models (P < 2.5 × 10−2) are indicated in bold, and P values remaining significant (P < 2.27 × 10−3) after further correction for the number of measurements (n = 11) are underlined. T-allele effect is shown as the estimated linear regression statistic β.
Hormonal parameters were adjusted to represent a 20-yr-old nonsmoker (BMI = 22 kg/m2) from Estonia, whose blood sample was taken at 0800 h.
Semen parameters were adjusted to represent a 20-yr-old nonsmoker from Estonia with ejaculation abstinence period of 96 h; for calculations of progressive motile (AB-motile) and motile (ABC-motile) spermatozoa, additional correction was applied to correspond to the motility assessed 30 min after ejaculation.
Total testes volume and sperm morphology were adjusted to represent a 20-yr-old man from Estonia.
Fig. 1.Box-and-whisker diagrams for the distribution of serum FSH (A), inhibin-B (B), LH (C), total testosterone (D), testis volume (E), and sperm concentration (F) in the Baltic young men cohort subgrouped according to their FSHB promoter SNP rs10835638 genotype (GG, n = 796; GT, n = 244; TT, n = 14). The boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles; the whiskers cover the 5th to 95th percentiles of the raw data. Circles represent the outlier values. The confounder adjusted median value is denoted as the dotted line that bisects the boxes. For each boxplot, P value of multiple linear regression (additive or recessive genetic model) and effect size (β) of the FSHB rs10835638 T-allele or T-allele homozygosity are shown.