K Klapheck1, S Nordmeyer, H Cronjäger, D Naber, T Bock. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. k.klapheck@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical research on subjective determinants of recovery and health has increased, but no instrument has been developed to assess the subjective experience and meaning of psychoses. We have therefore constructed and validated the Subjective Sense in Psychosis Questionnaire (SUSE) to measure sense making in psychotic disorders. METHOD: SUSE was based on an item pool generated by professionals and patients. For pre-testing, 90 psychosis patients completed the instrument. Psychometric properties were assessed using methods of classical test theory. In the main study, SUSE was administered to a representative sample of 400 patients. Factor structure, reliability and validity were assessed and confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were used for testing subscale coherence and adequacy of the hypothesized factor structure. Response effects due to clinical settings were tested using multilevel analyses. RESULTS: The final version of SUSE comprises 34 items measuring distinct aspects of the experience and meaning of psychoses in a consistent overall model with six coherent subscales representing positive and negative meanings throughout the course of psychotic disorders. Multilevel analyses indicate independence from clinical context effects. Patients relating psychotic experiences to life events assessed their symptoms and prospects more positively. 76% of patients assumed a relationship between their biography and the emergence of psychosis, 42% reported positive experience of symptoms and 74% ascribed positive consequences to their psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: SUSE features good psychometric qualities and offers an empirical acquisition to subjective assessment of psychosis. The results highlight the significance of subjective meaning making in psychoses and support a more biographical and in-depth psychological orientation for treatment.
BACKGROUND: Clinical research on subjective determinants of recovery and health has increased, but no instrument has been developed to assess the subjective experience and meaning of psychoses. We have therefore constructed and validated the Subjective Sense in Psychosis Questionnaire (SUSE) to measure sense making in psychotic disorders. METHOD: SUSE was based on an item pool generated by professionals and patients. For pre-testing, 90 psychosispatients completed the instrument. Psychometric properties were assessed using methods of classical test theory. In the main study, SUSE was administered to a representative sample of 400 patients. Factor structure, reliability and validity were assessed and confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were used for testing subscale coherence and adequacy of the hypothesized factor structure. Response effects due to clinical settings were tested using multilevel analyses. RESULTS: The final version of SUSE comprises 34 items measuring distinct aspects of the experience and meaning of psychoses in a consistent overall model with six coherent subscales representing positive and negative meanings throughout the course of psychotic disorders. Multilevel analyses indicate independence from clinical context effects. Patients relating psychotic experiences to life events assessed their symptoms and prospects more positively. 76% of patients assumed a relationship between their biography and the emergence of psychosis, 42% reported positive experience of symptoms and 74% ascribed positive consequences to their psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: SUSE features good psychometric qualities and offers an empirical acquisition to subjective assessment of psychosis. The results highlight the significance of subjective meaning making in psychoses and support a more biographical and in-depth psychological orientation for treatment.
Authors: Steffen Moritz; Candelaria I Mahlke; Stefan Westermann; Friederike Ruppelt; Paul H Lysaker; Thomas Bock; Christina Andreou Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Bernice C van Aken; Ayuk Bakia; André I Wierdsma; Yolande Voskes; Jaap Van Weeghel; Evelyn M M van Bussel; Carla Hagestein; Andrea M Ruissen; Pien Leendertse; Wishal V Sewbalak; Daphne A van der Draai; Alice Hammink; M E Mandos; Mark van der Gaag; Annette E Bonebakker; Christina M Van Der Feltz-Cornelis; Cornelis L Mulder Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Sou Bouy Lo; Christian G Huber; Andrea Meyer; Stefan Weinmann; Regula Luethi; Frieder Dechent; Stefan Borgwardt; Roselind Lieb; Undine E Lang; Julian Moeller Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 3.240