Literature DB >> 21733268

A school-based obesity control programme: Project Energize. Two-year outcomes.

Elaine Rush1, Peter Reed, Stephanie McLennan, Tara Coppinger, David Simmons, David Graham.   

Abstract

Through-school nutrition and physical activity interventions are designed to help reduce excess weight gain and risk of chronic disease. From 2004 to 2006, Project Energize was delivered in the Waikato Region of New Zealand as a longitudinal randomised controlled study of 124 schools (year 1-6), stratified by rurality and social deprivation, and randomly assigned to intervention or control. Children (686 boys and 662 girls) aged 5 (1926) and 10 (1426) years (692 interventions and 660 controls) had height, weight, body fat (by bioimpedance) and resting blood pressure (BP) measured at baseline and 2 years later. Each intervention school was assigned an 'Energizer'; a trained physical activity and nutrition change agent, who worked with the school to achieve goals based on healthier eating and quality physical activity. After adjustment for baseline measures, rurality and social deprivation, the intervention was associated with a reduced accumulation of body fat in younger children and a reduced rate of rise in systolic BP in older children. There was some evidence that the pattern of change within an age group varied with rurality, ethnicity and sex. We conclude that the introduction of an 'Energizer led' through-school programme may be associated with health benefits over 2 years, but the trajectory of this change needs to be measured over a longer period. Attention should also be paid to the differing response by ethnicity, sex, age group and the effect of rurality and social deprivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21733268     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114511003151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  30 in total

1.  Prevention of overweight and obesity in children and youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leslea Peirson; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Katherine Morrison; Donna Ciliska; Meghan Kenny; Muhammad Usman Ali; Parminder Raina
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-01-13

Review 2.  What childhood obesity prevention programmes work? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Wang; L Cai; Y Wu; R F Wilson; C Weston; O Fawole; S N Bleich; L J Cheskin; N N Showell; B D Lau; D T Chiu; A Zhang; J Segal
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  Differences in the effects of school meals on children's cognitive performance according to gender, household education and baseline reading skills.

Authors:  L B Sørensen; C T Damsgaard; R A Petersen; S-M Dalskov; M F Hjorth; C B Dyssegaard; N Egelund; I Tetens; A Astrup; L Lauritzen; K F Michaelsen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  Effect of childhood obesity prevention programs on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Cai; Yang Wu; Renee F Wilson; Jodi B Segal; Miyong T Kim; Youfa Wang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Childhood obesity: prevention and strategies of intervention. A systematic review of school-based interventions in primary schools.

Authors:  A Verrotti; L Penta; L Zenzeri; S Agostinelli; P De Feo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Overweight, air and noise pollution: Universal risk factors for pediatric pre-hypertension.

Authors:  Roya Kelishadi; Parinaz Poursafa; Kasra Keramatian
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Interventions for preventing obesity in children.

Authors:  Tamara Brown; Theresa Hm Moore; Lee Hooper; Yang Gao; Amir Zayegh; Sharea Ijaz; Martha Elwenspoek; Sophie C Foxen; Lucia Magee; Claire O'Malley; Elizabeth Waters; Carolyn D Summerbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-23

Review 8.  Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact.

Authors:  Rory McGill; Elspeth Anwar; Lois Orton; Helen Bromley; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Martin O'Flaherty; David Taylor-Robinson; Maria Guzman-Castillo; Duncan Gillespie; Patricia Moreira; Kirk Allen; Lirije Hyseni; Nicola Calder; Mark Petticrew; Martin White; Margaret Whitehead; Simon Capewell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Socioeconomic gradients in the effects of universal school-based health behaviour interventions: a systematic review of intervention studies.

Authors:  Graham F Moore; Hannah J Littlecott; Ruth Turley; Elizabeth Waters; Simon Murphy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Gender differences on effectiveness of a school-based physical activity intervention for reducing cardiometabolic risk: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno; Mairena Sánchez-López; Blanca Notario-Pacheco; Fernando Salcedo-Aguilar; Montserrat Solera-Martínez; Pablo Franquelo-Morales; Sara López-Martínez; Jorge C García-Prieto; Natalia Arias-Palencia; Coral Torrijos-Niño; Ricardo Mora-Rodríguez; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.