BACKGROUND: We performed a comparative analysis of the genome-wide DNA methylation profiles from three human embryonic stem cell (HESC) lines. It had previously been shown that HESC lines had significantly higher non-CG methylation than differentiated cells, and we therefore asked whether these sites were conserved across cell lines. RESULTS: We find that heavily methylated non-CG sites are strongly conserved, especially when found within the motif TACAG. They are enriched in splice sites and are more methylated than other non-CG sites in genes. We next studied the relationship between allele-specific expression and allele-specific methylation. By combining bisulfite sequencing and whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (RNA-seq) data we identified 1,020 genes that show allele-specific expression, and 14% of CG sites genome-wide have allele-specific methylation. Finally, we asked whether the methylation state of transcription factor binding sites affects the binding of transcription factors. We identified variations in methylation levels at binding sites and found that for several transcription factors the correlation between the methylation at binding sites and gene expression is generally stronger than in the neighboring sequences. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a possible but as yet unknown functional role for the highly methylated conserved non-CG sites in the regulation of HESCs. We also identified a novel set of genes that are likely transcriptionally regulated by methylation in an allele-specific manner. The analysis of transcription factor binding sites suggests that the methylation state of cis-regulatory elements impacts the ability of factors to bind and regulate transcription.
BACKGROUND: We performed a comparative analysis of the genome-wide DNA methylation profiles from three human embryonic stem cell (HESC) lines. It had previously been shown that HESC lines had significantly higher non-CG methylation than differentiated cells, and we therefore asked whether these sites were conserved across cell lines. RESULTS: We find that heavily methylated non-CG sites are strongly conserved, especially when found within the motif TACAG. They are enriched in splice sites and are more methylated than other non-CG sites in genes. We next studied the relationship between allele-specific expression and allele-specific methylation. By combining bisulfite sequencing and whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (RNA-seq) data we identified 1,020 genes that show allele-specific expression, and 14% of CG sites genome-wide have allele-specific methylation. Finally, we asked whether the methylation state of transcription factor binding sites affects the binding of transcription factors. We identified variations in methylation levels at binding sites and found that for several transcription factors the correlation between the methylation at binding sites and gene expression is generally stronger than in the neighboring sequences. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a possible but as yet unknown functional role for the highly methylated conserved non-CG sites in the regulation of HESCs. We also identified a novel set of genes that are likely transcriptionally regulated by methylation in an allele-specific manner. The analysis of transcription factor binding sites suggests that the methylation state of cis-regulatory elements impacts the ability of factors to bind and regulate transcription.
Authors: D Humpherys; K Eggan; H Akutsu; K Hochedlinger; W M Rideout ; D Biniszkiewicz; R Yanagimachi; R Jaenisch Journal: Science Date: 2001-07-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Philippe P Luedi; Fred S Dietrich; Jennifer R Weidman; Jason M Bosko; Randy L Jirtle; Alexander J Hartemink Journal: Genome Res Date: 2007-11-30 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Rafael A Irizarry; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Benilton Carvalho; Hao Wu; Sheri A Brandenburg; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Bo Wen; Andrew P Feinberg Journal: Genome Res Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: B H Ramsahoye; D Biniszkiewicz; F Lyko; V Clark; A P Bird; R Jaenisch Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-05-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hong Ji; Lauren I R Ehrlich; Jun Seita; Peter Murakami; Akiko Doi; Paul Lindau; Hwajin Lee; Martin J Aryee; Rafael A Irizarry; Kitai Kim; Derrick J Rossi; Matthew A Inlay; Thomas Serwold; Holger Karsunky; Lena Ho; George Q Daley; Irving L Weissman; Andrew P Feinberg Journal: Nature Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: M Brandeis; D Frank; I Keshet; Z Siegfried; M Mendelsohn; A Nemes; V Temper; A Razin; H Cedar Journal: Nature Date: 1994-09-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Robin Andersson; Stefan Enroth; Alvaro Rada-Iglesias; Claes Wadelius; Jan Komorowski Journal: Genome Res Date: 2009-08-17 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Sofia Gkountela; Kelvin X Zhang; Tiasha A Shafiq; Wen-Wei Liao; Joseph Hargan-Calvopiña; Pao-Yang Chen; Amander T Clark Journal: Cell Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Ximena Paez-Colasante; Claudia Figueroa-Romero; Stacey A Sakowski; Stephen A Goutman; Eva L Feldman Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Benyam Kinde; Harrison W Gabel; Caitlin S Gilbert; Eric C Griffith; Michael E Greenberg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Noah J Kessler; Timothy E Van Baak; Maria S Baker; Eleonora Laritsky; Cristian Coarfa; Robert A Waterland Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 6.150