Literature DB >> 21733109

Anesthesia and analgesia-related preferences and outcomes of women who have birth plans.

Angela Pennell, Victoria Salo-Coombs, Amy Herring, Fred Spielman, Karamarie Fecho.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study described anesthesia and analgesia-related preferences and outcomes of women who used a birth plan for labor and birth.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted (N = 63). Data were abstracted from medical records, birth plans, and a follow-up survey. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.
RESULTS: Women who elected birth plans were primarily white, college-educated, primigravida, and under the care of a certified nurse-midwife. One-third of births were induced, 10% required instrumentation, and 29% were cesarean births. Nearly every birth was associated with at least 1 labor and birth complication, although most complications were minor. Analgesic preferences were reported to be the most important birth plan request. Greater than 50% of women requested to avoid epidural analgesia; however, 65% of women received epidural analgesia. On follow-up, greater than 90% of women who received epidural analgesia reported being pleased. The majority of women agreed that the birth plan enhanced their birth experiences, added control, clarified their thoughts, and improved communication with their health care providers. DISCUSSION: Anesthesia and analgesia-related preferences were an important component of the birth plans. The majority of women favorably viewed the use of a birth plan, whether or not preferences were fulfilled or complications occurred.
© 2011 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21733109     DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00032.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  7 in total

1.  Online Birth Plans and Anticipatory Guidance: A Critical Review Using Web Analytics and Crowdsourcing.

Authors:  Christina D Yarrington; Kari Radoff; Chloe A Zera
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2018

2.  Effectiveness of birth plan counselling based on shared decision making: A cluster randomized controlled trial (APLANT).

Authors:  Encarnación López-Gimeno; Gloria Seguranyes; Mercedes Vicente-Hernández; Lucia Burgos Cubero; Griselda Vázquez Garreta; Gemma Falguera-Puig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  The Impact of Choice and Control on Women's Childbirth Experiences.

Authors:  Katie Cook; Colleen Loomis
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2012

4.  Managing the pain of labour: factors associated with the use of labour pain management for pregnant Australian women.

Authors:  Amie Steel; Jon Adams; David Sibbritt; Alex Broom; Cindy Gallois; Jane Frawley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Association between Birth Plan Use and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Southern Spain: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Pedro Hidalgo-Lopezosa; Ana María Cubero-Luna; Andrea Jiménez-Ruz; María Hidalgo-Maestre; María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego; Pablo Jesús López-Soto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Birth plan presentation to hospitals and its relation to obstetric outcomes and selected pain relief methods during childbirth.

Authors:  Encarnación López-Gimeno; Gemma Falguera-Puig; Mª Mercedes Vicente-Hernández; Meritxell Angelet; Griselda Vázquez Garreta; Gloria Seguranyes
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  When choice becomes limited: Women's experiences of delay in labour.

Authors:  Natalie Armstrong; Sara Kenyon
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2016-07-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.